Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.66LIKELY
Sadness
0.19UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.53LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.29UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.95LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.6LIKELY
Extraversion
0.09UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.26UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.56LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
We’re working our way through the Creation narrative all the way to the Fall for Lent.
Thus far we’ve been through the 6 days of Creation and last week we spent some time recognizing that the first full day experience that our ancestors had of God was the day in which God rested.
We also talked about the fact that the day did not end, there was no “there was evening, and there was morning, the seventh day” description that we have come to expect as we’ve journeyed through this narrative.
As we began our journey we recognized that Chapter 1 of Genesis and Chapter 2 seem to contradict one another.
Yet, it is one an the same God and it is the same Creation.
Considering the differences Bonhoeffer wrote:
The first is about the Creator and Lord, the second about the fatherly God who is near at hand.[5]
The first is about humankind as the final work of God, with the whole world created before humankind, the second just the other way around: in the beginning humanity is created, and around humankind, for the sake of humankind, God fashions animals and birds and lets the trees grow.
The second account tells the story of humankind—the first is about what God does; but the second is about the history of humanity with God—the first is about the work of God with humanity; the second is about the God who is near at hand—the first is about the strange God; the second about God in human form, the God of childlike anthropomorphism—whereas the first is about the deity of God.
Yet both are only human words, childlike but humble words, about the same God and the same humankind.
And so we read these words from Genesis:
May God bless to our understanding this reading from His Word.
As I said it seems that this is not the same Creation in that the order seems backwards.
But as Bonhoeffer points out this is the story of humankind.
And one thing that stands out immediately - though not so much in the English is there in vs. 5
God is no longer the generic name of God - elohim, but is give a very specific name which here is translated LORD, so now we have LORD God.
The word that is there for Lord, is Yahweh - for which there is no agreement as to it’s meaning other than it is the name of God.
At this point God goes from being a deity out there to one that is personable, called by name, relatable.
That changes things…it’s not some ethereal God out there, it is the LORD God it is Yahweh Himself.
This having a personal name is true for us as well as Christians.
Jesus Christ is the name of God.
Speaking of Jesus, the apostle Paul wrote to the Colossian church:
Going on in our text we see that this account of the creation is Human centric
Let’s focus on the creation of the man...
In everything else in Creation there is no explanation of HOW it was created.
Even in the Creation narrative that we explored in Chapter 1, we saw on Day 1:
Then on Day 2:
Then on Day 3:
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
And then we got to the Creation of Humankind, and it was decidedly different.
God begins with “Let us MAKE man in OUR IMAGE.”
That’s different than, “Let there be...” Or “Let the earth bring forth...”
Now in Chapter 2 we have it spoken of similarly:
God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.
God formed - that’s personal, that’s different.
Of dust - there is the sense here of intentional molding shaping, and forming that we don’t get with any other part of Creation.
I don’t recall who said it, but God gets his hands dirty with the creation of Humankind.
It’s important also to note that humankind is not formed of the cursed earth that we experience today, this is pre-Fall.
This is the blessed earth, that God saw was good.
The earth is truly the mother of humankind.
This is much clearer in the Hebrew where we see that the word earth or ground is adama אֲדָמָה, and the word for man is adam אָדָם
אֲדָמָה
אָדָם
If we look at the Hebrew forms (reading right to left) you can see the top adama, and the bottom adam are very similar.
Okay, that was your Hebrew Lesson for the day.
But what we see is that in the Beginning God is intimately involved with humankind.
We’re not far away from God, but God is very present, intimately involved.
You and I as humans are intimately tied to the earth as well.
We exist from the earth.
God forms us of the earth and breathes the breath of life into us.
As a pastor I’ve had the amazing privilege to be with families at the time of the passing of a loved one.
One of the things that has always struck me in that moment of transition is that where there was life only a few moments ago, there is now only a body.
But the human body differs from all non-human bodies in that it is the form in which the Spirit of God exists on earth.
We live only by God’s Spirit that God breathed into us.
In our sinful state we know that this body as it was originally created has been destroyed, but God enters it anew in Jesus Christ.
Paul wrote to the Corinthians,
We are about to celebrate the Lord’s Supper.
The body and blood of the Lord’s supper are the new realities of creation promised to fallen Humankind.
Because Adam was created as body, Adam is also redeemed as body in Jesus Christ.
Bonhoeffer wrote:
Because Adam is created as body, Adam is also redeemed as body [and God comes to Adam as body],[20] in Jesus Christ and in the sacrament.
Humankind created in this way is humankind as the image of God.
It is the image of God not in spite of but precisely in its bodily nature.
For in their bodily nature human beings are related to the earth and to other bodies; they are there for others and are dependent upon others.
In their bodily existence human beings find their brothers and sisters and find the earth.
As such creatures human beings of earth and spirit are ‘like’ God, their Creator.[21]
Let’s pray.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9