Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.05UNLIKELY
Fear
0.16UNLIKELY
Joy
0.16UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.67LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.19UNLIKELY
Confident
0.7LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.81LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.25UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.55LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.63LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.66LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
SALVATION in THE OF ACTS
 
 
 
!!!  
Presented to
Dr. James Smith
Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary
__________________
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for BIB2345
__________________
by
Robert D. Bennett
August 14, 2006
 
 
\\ Salvation of Acts
Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.
!!  
 
\\ !! First level subhead
Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Kenneth Gangel, /Coaching Ministry Teams / (Nashville: Word Publishing, 2000) and page 45.
 
!!!  
!! First level subhead
!!  
Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  William W. Klein, /Introduction to Biblical Interpretation/, (Dallas: Word Publishing, 1993) and page 143.
!! First level subhead
!!  
Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A.  Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Sample text A. Henry Kloop, /The Ministry Play Book: Strategic Planning /(Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004) and page 45.
 
!! Conclusion \\ New challenges to faith appear in every age.
A pervasive anti-supernaturalism in the culture was answered by Southern Baptists in 1925, when the Baptist Faith and Message was first adopted by this Convention.
In 1963, Southern Baptists responded to assaults upon the authority and truthfulness of the Bible by adopting revisions to the Baptist Faith and Message.
The Convention added an article on "The Family" in 1998, thus answering cultural confusion with the clear teachings of Scripture.
Now, faced with a culture hostile to the very notion of truth, this generation of Baptists must claim anew the eternal truths of the Christian faith.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9