Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.15UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.5LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.51LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.42UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.62LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.83LIKELY
Extraversion
0.14UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.58LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.85LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
This was how business was done.
Business was often done at the city gate.
There was no "stock exchange" back then.
The elders were the leaders of the city, and were there to witness the transaction.
As Naomi said in , Boaz is getting this thing done.
By the law, the closest relative had first "dibs" on Elimilech's land.
This is the law of the kinsman redeemer.
This is the law of the kinsman redeemer.
(NKJV)
(NKJV)
This is the law of the kinsman redeemer.
(NKJV)
‘The land shall not be sold permanently, for the land is Mine; for you are strangers and sojourners with Me.
And in all the land of your possession you shall grant redemption of the land.
‘If one of your brethren becomes poor, and has sold some of his possession, and if his redeeming relative comes to redeem it, then he may redeem what his brother sold.
There is land that Elimelech sold when he took his family to Moab.
b.
There is land that Elimelech sold when he took his family to Moab.
As Naomi said in , Boaz is getting this thing done.
Now Boaz wants to redeem the land, and by law Ruth as a wife.
However, this closer relative has first claim to redeem the land.
Boaz is following the law, by bringing this to the close relative's attention and asking if he will redeem Elimelech's land or let Boaz do it.
Boaz is taking a risk.
If he wants Naomi’s land, and Ruth, this closer relative may take her.
Boaz would have no legal recourse.
Boaz does what is right, even at the risk of not getting what he wants.
The close relative wants the land.
What is Boaz to do?
The close relative wants the land.
Boaz mentions that if the relative redeems the land he also has to marry Ruth.
This not only means marrying Ruth, but raising a son for Ruth's husband Mahlon.
(NKJV)
(NKJV)
“If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside the family; her husband’s brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her.
And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel.
That means, when Mahlon’s son comes of age the land would become his at the next Jubilee.
a.i.1.
That means, when Mahlon’s son comes of age the land would become his at the next Jubilee.
Notice, Boaz doesn't rail against the rules, nor does try to trick the close relative.
He just points out the facts.
In fact, as we will find out, Boaz does this man a favor by reminding him of the responsibility he would be taking on.
The close redeemer wants the land, but the "cost" is too high.
He does not want to impact his own inheritance.
He is not shown to be evil or greedy, but he does put his inheritance ahead of the welfare of his relatives.
I guess this is one way to sign a contract.
(NKJV)
(NKJV)
But if the man does not want to take his brother’s wife, then let his brother’s wife go up to the gate to the elders, and say, ‘My husband’s brother refuses to raise up a name to his brother in Israel; he will not perform the duty of my husband’s brother.’
Then the elders of his city shall call him and speak to him.
But if he stands firm and says, ‘I do not want to take her,’ then his brother’s wife shall come to him in the presence of the elders, remove his sandal from his foot, spit in his face, and answer and say, ‘So shall it be done to the man who will not build up his brother’s house.’
And his name shall be called in Israel, ‘The house of him who had his sandal removed.’
then his brother’s wife shall come to him in the presence of the elders, remove his sandal from his foot, spit in his face, and answer and say, ‘So shall it be done to the man who will not build up his brother’s house.’
And his name shall be called in Israel, ‘The house of him who had his sandal removed.’
The family line in Israel is very important to God.
If a person would not assist a family member in need, they were to be shamed.
Boaz redeems Elimelech's land.
Boaz redeems Ruth as his wife.
Boaz will raise a son to perpetuate Mahlon's name.
The elders confirm they are witness to the transaction.
They also call for a blessing on this family.
That they may be like Rachel and Leah, the mothers of the twelve tribes of Israel.
Remember when Naomi told people to call her Mara?
(NKJV)
(NKJV)
But she said to them, “Do not call me Naomi; call me Mara, for the Almighty has dealt very bitterly with me.
I went out full, and the Lord has brought me home again empty.
Why do you call me Naomi, since the Lord has testified against me, and the Almighty has afflicted me?”
Her husband’s land is redeemed.
Her daughter-in-law has a new husband and will be provided for.
Now Naomi gets to hold her grandson.
a.
Now Naomi gets to hold her grandson.
As a closing note, the genealogy of this child, born out of this incredible story is told.
This child came through Perez, the son of Judah.
This child's grandson became the greatest, king of Israel.
As believers, do we trust in the ways of God?
Do we do things God’s way, even when we think another way would be better?
Do we turn the other cheek or do we strike back?
Do we give to the needy or do we expect others to do it for us?
Do we hold to what Scripture says even if it means a personal or professional loss?
Do we believe that the ends justify the means?
Do we justify our actions by cherry-picking words from Scripture?
Are we willing to compromise our ethics in order to obtain some greater good?
Do we compromise our witness in order to introduce others to God?
And when we do so, are we introducing them to God or our caricature of Him?
Do we trust that God wants what is best for us?
Do we look at the Ten Commandments as things God doesn’t want us to have or as rules to keep us safe and healthy?
Will we wait for the person God has chosen for us or marry based on what we want?
Will we take the job or go to the school God calls us to, or the one that makes more sense to us?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9