Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.65LIKELY
Sadness
0.19UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.45UNLIKELY
Confident
0.31UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.88LIKELY
Extraversion
0.16UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.63LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.67LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
+ In Nomine Jesu +
Grace to you and peace, from God our Father and from our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
Amen.
The Pharisees and Scribes had developed a code of holiness.
The tradition of the elders, as it was called, was handed down from generation to generation.
As we heard in last week’s Gospel reading, that code included the washing of their hands after going to the market and before eating.
If they did the things the code commanded they considered themselves in good standing with God.
In fact, they considered themselves to be holy.
If they didn’t do the things the code commanded they were defiled, which meant, they were out of fellowship, or, communion with God.
Ultimately, the code gave them a sense of control over their relationship with God.
It also gave them plenty of opportunity to meet out a healthy dose of righteous indignation on those who failed to keep it.
Last Sunday’s reading was a perfect example, as they called out Jesus’ disciples for not washing before they ate bread.
The Pharisees and Scribes had developed an oral code of holiness.
As we heard in last week’s Gospel reading, they were to wash their hands before meals and after going to the market.
If they did the things the code commanded they were right, they were good with God.
If they didn’t do the things the code commanded...well, let’s just say, they followed the code religiously.
The system gave them a sense of control over their relationship with God.
It also gave them plenty of opportunity to meet out a healthy dose of righteous indignation over those who failed to keep the code.
Jesus condemned the Pharisees and Scribes for their hypocrisy.
Not, mind you, because they didn’t keep the code, but, in a sense, because they did keep it.
At the same time, they judged and held in contempt those who didn’t.
Quoting the prophet Isaiah, Jesus said, “this people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.”
In other words, they looked really good on the outside but inside, as Jesus said elsewhere, “(they) cleansed the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside (they were) full of greed and wickedness.”
cleanse the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside you are full of kgreed and wickedness.
This people honors me with their lips,
but their heart is far from me;
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version.
(2016).
().
Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
In this morning’s Gospel reading, Jesus attacked another aspect of the oral code of the Pharisees and Scribes, namely, the dietary laws that they had taken to extremes.
At the same time, He directed them away from outward appearances to the condition of the heart.
Of course, what He says here to the Pharisees and Scribes applies to all of us.
“Do you not see (He says) that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?”
(Thus he declared all foods clean.)
And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him.”
For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness.
All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”
For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, mmurder, adultery, 22 coveting, wickedness, deceit, nsensuality, oenvy, pslander, qpride, rfoolishness.
23 sAll these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”
Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, 19 since it enters not his heart jbut his stomach, and is expelled?”6
(kThus he declared all foods clean.)
20 And he said, l“What comes out of a person is what defiles him.
n ; ; ; ;
o See (Gk.)
p ; ;
j []
q See
r []
6 Greek goes out into the latrine
s ,
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version.
(2016).
().
Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
k [; ; ]
Broadly speaking, today’s Gospel reading is a call to repentance.
It is a call for us to confess our sin to God and to throw ourselves before Him for His forgiveness and grace.
As Christians, we are, of course, well versed in the practice of repentance.
As Lutheran Christians, perhaps even more so.
After all, the very first of Luther’s 95 thesis, which sparked the Lutheran Reformation, was about repentance.
He wrote, “when our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, said, repent, He intended that everyday of the life of a Christian be one of repentance.”
Luther could speak so unequivocally about repentance because it is the proper response of the baptized, who recognize that the old nature must daily drown and be put to death that the new nature in Christ might come forth.
l ;
So, as Lutheran Christians, we’re pretty well versed in the piety, the practice of repentance.
There is way though, in our repentance, that we can fall prey to the sin that plagued the Pharisees and Scribes.
Oh, I don’t mean that we would so grossly and blatantly put all of our confidence before God in our works, although, that too is possible, even for the baptized.
What I mean is that, even in our repentance, we can fail to be mindful of the sin that truly plagues us, the sin that binds us and moves us to less than honorable words and deeds.
C.S. Lewis, in an article he wrote in 1940, titled, ‘The Dangers of National Repentance,’ said, “The first and fatal charm of national repentance is…the encouragement it gives us to turn from the bitter task of repenting our own sins to the congenial one of bewailing—but, first, of denouncing—the conduct of others.”
His point was that there is a way in which sin can be denounced, repented of, if you will, without actually owning it.
“The first and fatal charm of national repentance is…the encouragement it gives us to turn from the bitter task of repenting our own sins to the congenial one of bewailing—but, first, of denouncing—the conduct of others.”
“The first and fatal charm of national repentance is…the encouragement it gives us to turn from the bitter task of repenting our own sins to the congenial one of bewailing—but, first, of denouncing—the conduct of others.”
“The first and fatal charm of national repentance is…the encouragement it gives us to turn from the bitter task of repenting our own sins to the congenial one of bewailing—but, first, of denouncing—the conduct of others.”
“The first and fatal charm of national repentance is…the encouragement it gives us to turn from the bitter task of repenting our own sins to the congenial one of bewailing—but, first, of denouncing—the conduct of others.”
Another writer recently set out to explain Lewis’ point by way of an example.
He said, “It would be easy for me to go around apologizing for the curse of African slavery in America.
A lot of people do.
Not only is this easy in the sense that obviously slavery is wrong and so it’s simple to identify as sin and evil, but it’s easy for me because it doesn’t hit home.
I wasn’t alive during that time, and I can’t even feel “genetically guilty” on behalf of ancestors, since most of them didn’t immigrate (to the United States) until after the Civil War.
It’s easy, because it’s far removed from the real sin that exists in my heart.
He continues, “It would be much harder for me to go around apologizing for every wicked thought, cruelty and sarcasm and rudeness in words, laziness at work, covetousness of others’ belongings, elitism and being judgmental according to outward appearances.
These are things I know are integrated into my heart, soul, mind and personality.
They are the things that I really have to repent about.
They are the things that God has saved me from.
And they are things that I still struggle against every day, along with every other person on this planet ever.”
“What comes out of a person is what defiles him (Jesus says).”
On the other hand, righteousness, goodness, the very qualities that God calls us to exhibit come, not from inside us, but from outside of us.
This is really the essence of the Gospel.
The hope of your salvation doesn’t come from within you, but from outside of you.
Thus, your confidence, your hope before God, doesn’t come from the condition of your heart.
Rather, it is the condition of your heart, and the promise of His grace and mercy, that drive you to Him, that you might be and remain a new creation, born anew by the mercy of God in Christ Jesus.
love, joy, peace, patience, gkindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23 hgentleness, iself-control; jagainst such things there is no law.
24 And those who belong to Christ Jesus khave crucified the flesh with its lpassions and desires.
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version.
(2016).
().
Wheaton: Standard Bible Society.
Indeed, in holy baptism, you are a new creation in Christ.
Any goodness in your heart today is a goodness put there by God’s Spirit.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9