False Prophets and Teaches notes
Then Jesus warns against false prophets (vv. 15–23). The false prophets popularize the broad road by advocating a lawless way of life. They are easily recognized, for what they do reveals what they are (vv. 15–20), and what they do contradicts what they say (vv. 21–23). In verse 23b “evildoers” (lit. workers of lawlessness) shows that the antinomian does not really live without law; he chooses his own law instead of God’s.
ALMOST every phrase and word in this section would ring an answering bell in the minds of the Jews who heard it for the first time.
The Jews knew all about false prophets. Jeremiah, for instance, had his conflict with the prophets who said: ‘ “Peace, peace”, when there is no peace’ (Jeremiah 6:14, 8:11). Wolves was the very name by which false rulers and false prophets were called. In the bad days, Ezekiel had said: ‘Its officials within it are like wolves tearing the prey, shedding blood, destroying lives to get dishonest gain’ (Ezekiel 22:27). Zephaniah drew a grim picture of the state of things in Israel, when ‘The officials within it are roaring lions; its judges are evening wolves that leave nothing until the morning. Its prophets are reckless, faithless persons’ (Zephaniah 3:3–4). When Paul was warning the elders of Ephesus of dangers to come, as he took a last farewell of them, he said: ‘Savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock’ (Acts 20:29). Jesus said that he was sending out his disciples as sheep in the midst of wolves (Matthew 10:16); and he told of the good shepherd who protected the flock from the wolves with his life (John 10:12). Here indeed was a picture which everyone could recognize and understand.
He said that the false prophets were like wolves in sheep’s clothing. When the shepherd watched his flocks upon the hillside, his garment was a sheepskin, worn with the skin outside and the fleece inside. But a man might wear a shepherd’s dress and still not be a shepherd. The prophets had acquired a conventional dress. Elijah had a mantle (1 Kings 19:13, 19), and that mantle had been a hairy cloak (2 Kings 1:8). That sheepskin mantle had become the uniform of the prophets, just as the Greek philosophers had worn the philosopher’s robe. It was by that mantle that the prophet could be distinguished from other men. But sometimes that form of dress was worn by those who had no right to it, for Zechariah in his picture of the great days to come says: ‘They will not put on a hairy mantle in order to deceive’ (Zechariah 13:4). There were those who wore a prophet’s cloak but who lived anything but a prophet’s life.
There were false prophets in the ancient days, but there were also false prophets in New Testament times. Matthew was written about AD 85, and at that time prophets were still an institution in the Church. They had no fixed abode, and had given up everything to wander throughout the country, bringing to the churches a message which they believed to come directly from God.
At their best, the prophets were the inspiration of the Church, for they had abandoned everything to serve God and the Church of God. But the office of prophet was singularly liable to abuse. There were some who used it to gain prestige and to impose on the generosity of local congregations, and so live a life of comfortable and even pampered idleness. The Didachē is the first order book of the Christian Church; it dates to about AD 100; and its regulations concerning these wandering prophets are very illuminating. A true prophet was to be held in the highest honour; he was to be welcomed; his word must never be disregarded, and his freedom must never be curtailed; but ‘He shall remain one day, and, if necessary, another day also; but if he remain three days, he is a false prophet.’ He must never ask for anything but bread. ‘If he asks for money, he is a false prophet.’ Prophets all claim to speak in the Spirit, but there is one acid test: ‘By their characters a true and a false prophet shall be known.’ ‘Every prophet that teacheth the truth, if he do not what he teacheth, is a false prophet.’ If a prophet, claiming to speak in the Spirit, orders a table and a meal to be set before him, he is a false prophet. ‘Whosoever shall say in the Spirit: Give me money or any other things, ye shall not hear him; but if he tell you to give in the matter of others who have need, let no one judge him.’ If a wanderer comes to a congregation, and wishes to settle there, if he has a trade, ‘let him work and eat’. If he has no trade, ‘consider in your wisdom how he may not live with you as a Christian in idleness … But if he will not do this, he is a trafficker in Christ. Beware of such’ (Didachē, chapters 11–12).
Past history and present events made the words of Jesus meaningful to those who heard them for the first time, and to those to whom Matthew transmitted them.
KNOWN BY THEIR FRUITS
Matthew 7:15–20 (contd)
THE Jews, the Greeks and the Romans all used the idea that a tree is to be judged by its fruits. ‘Like root, like fruit,’ ran the proverb. Epictetus was later to say: ‘How can a vine grow not like a vine but like an olive, or, how can an olive grow not like an olive but like a vine?’ (Epictetus, Discourses, 2:20). Seneca declared that good cannot grow from evil any more than a fig tree can from an olive.
But there is more in this than meets the eye. ‘Are grapes gathered from thorns?’ asked Jesus. There was a certain thorn, the buckthorn, which had little black berries which closely resembled little grapes. ‘Or figs from thistles?’ There was a certain thistle which had a flower which, at least at a distance, might well be taken for a fig.
The point is real, and relevant, and salutary. There may be a superficial resemblance between the true and the false prophet. The false prophet may wear the right clothes and use the right language; but you cannot sustain life with the berries of a buckthorn or the flowers of a thistle; and the life of the soul can never be sustained with the food which a false prophet offers. The real test of any teaching is: does it strengthen people to bear the burdens of life, and to walk in the way wherein they ought to go?
Let us then look at the false prophets and see their characteristics. If the way is difficult and the gate is so narrow that it is hard to find, then we must be very careful to get ourselves teachers who will help us to find it, and not teachers who will lure us away from it.
The basic fault of false prophets is self-interest. True shepherds care for the flock more than they care for their own lives; wolves care for nothing but to satisfy their own gluttony and their own greed. False prophets are in the business of teaching not for what they can give to others, but for what they can get out of it for themselves.
The Jews were alive to this danger. The Rabbis were the Jewish teachers, but it was one of the most important principles of Jewish law that a Rabbi must have a trade by which he earned his living, and must on no account accept any payment for teaching. Rabbi Zadok said: ‘Make the knowledge of the law neither a crown wherewith to make a show, nor a spade wherewith to dig.’ Rabbi Hillel said: ‘He who uses the crown of the law for external aims fades away.’ The Jews knew all about teachers who used their teaching self-interestedly for no other reason than to make a profit for themselves. There are three ways in which teachers can be dominated by self-interest.
(1) They may teach solely for gain. It is told that there was trouble in the Church in the Scottish town of Ecclefechan, where Thomas Carlyle’s father was an elder. It was a dispute between the congregation and the minister on a matter of money and of salary. When much had been said on both sides, Carlyle’s father rose and uttered one devastating sentence: ‘Give the hireling his wages, and let him go.’ No one can live on nothing, and few can do their best work when the pressure of material things is too fiercely on them; but the great privilege of teaching is not the pay it offers but the thrill of opening the minds of children, and young people, and men and women to the truth.
(2) They may teach solely for prestige. They may teach in order to help others, or they may teach to show how clever they are. The theologian James Denney once said a savage thing: ‘No man can at one and the same time prove that he is clever and that Christ is wonderful.’ Prestige is the last thing that the great teachers desire. J. P. Struthers was a saint of God. He spent all his life in the service of the little Reformed Presbyterian Church when he could have occupied any pulpit in Britain. People loved him, and the better they knew him the more they loved him. Two men were talking of him. One man knew all that Struthers had done, but did not know Struthers personally. Remembering Struthers’ saintly ministry, he said: ‘Struthers will have a front seat in the kingdom of heaven.’ The other had known Struthers personally, and his answer was: ‘Struthers would be miserable in a front seat anywhere.’ There are some teachers and preachers who use their message as a setting for themselves. False prophets are interested in self-display; true prophets desire self-obliteration.
(3) They may teach solely to transmit their own ideas. False prophets are out to disseminate their own versions of the truth; true prophets are out to proclaim God’s truth. It is quite true that we must think all things out for ourselves; but it was said of John Brown, the eighteenth-century minister of the Scottish town of Haddington, that when he preached, repeatedly he used to pause ‘as if listening for a voice’. True prophets listen to God before they speak. They never forget that they are nothing more than voices to speak for God and channels through which God’s grace can come to men and women. It is the duty of every teacher and preacher to bring to men and women not their private ideas of the truth, but the truth as it is in Jesus Christ.
THE FRUITS OF FALSENESS
Matthew 7:15–20 (contd)
THIS passage has much to say about the evil fruits of the false prophets. What are the false effects, the evil fruits, which a false prophet may produce?
(1) Teaching is false if it produces a religion which consists solely or mainly in the observance of externals. That is what was wrong with the scribes and Pharisees. To them, religion consisted in the observance of the ceremonial law. If people went through the correct procedure of handwashing, if on the Sabbath they never carried anything weighing more than two figs, if they never walked on the Sabbath further than the prescribed distance, if they were meticulous in giving tithes of everything down to the herbs of the kitchen garden, then they were considered to be good.
It is easy to confuse religion with religious practices. It is possible—and indeed not uncommon—to teach that religion consists in going to church, observing the Lord’s Day, fulfilling one’s financial obligations to the church and reading one’s Bible. A person might do all these things and be far from being a Christian, for Christianity is an attitude of the heart to God and to one another.
(2) Teaching is false if it produces a religion which consists in prohibitions. Any religion which is based on a series of ‘you shall nots’ is a false religion. There have been some teachers who have said to those who have set out on the Christian way: ‘From now on you will no longer go to the cinema; from now on you will no longer dance; from now on you will no longer smoke or use make-up; from now on you will no longer read a novel or a Sunday newspaper; from now on you will never enter a theatre.’
If we could become Christians simply by abstaining from doing things, Christianity would be a much easier religion than it is. But the whole essence of Christianity is that it does not consist in not doing things; it consists in doing things. A negative Christianity on our part can never answer the positive love of God.
(3) Teaching is false if it produces an easy religion. There were false teachers in the days of Paul, an echo of whose teaching we can hear in Romans 6. They said to Paul: ‘You believe that God’s grace is the biggest thing in the universe?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘You believe that God’s grace is wide enough to cover every sin?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Well then, if that is so, let us go on sinning to our hearts’ content. God will forgive. And, after all, our sin is simply giving God’s wonderful grace an opportunity to operate.’ A religion like that is a travesty of religion because it is an insult to the love of God.
Any teaching which takes the iron out of religion, any teaching which takes the cross out of Christianity, any teaching which eliminates the threat from the voice of Christ, any teaching which pushes judgment into the background and makes people think lightly of sin, is false teaching.
(4) Teaching is false if it divorces religion and life. Any teaching which removes the Christian from the life and activity of the world is false. That was the mistake the monks and the hermits made. It was their belief that to live the Christian life they must retire to a desert or to a monastery, that they must cut themselves off from the engrossing and tempting life of the world, that they could only be truly Christian by ceasing to live in the world. Jesus said, as he prayed for his disciples: ‘I am not asking you to take them out of the world, but I ask you to protect them from the evil one’ (John 17:15). There was one particular instance of a journalist who found it hard to maintain her Christian principles in the life of a daily newspaper, and who left it to take up work on a purely religious journal.
No one can be a good soldier by running away, and the Christian is the soldier of Christ. How shall the leaven ever work if the leaven refuses to be inserted into the mass? What is witness worth unless it is witness to those who do not believe? Any teaching which encourages people to take what the President of Princeton Theological Seminary, John Mackay, called ‘the balcony view of life’ is wrong. Christians are not spectators from the balcony; they are involved in the warfare of life.
(5) Teaching is false if it produces a religion which is arrogant and separatist. Any teaching which encourages people to withdraw into a narrow sect, and to regard the rest of the world as sinners, is false teaching. The function of religion is not to erect middle walls of partition but to tear them down. It is the dream of Jesus Christ that there shall be one flock and one shepherd (John 10:16). Exclusiveness is not a religious quality; it is an irreligious quality. Harry Emerson Fosdick, the American Baptist minister, quotes four lines of doggerel:
We are God’s chosen few,
All others will be damned;
There is no room in heaven for you;
We can’t have heaven crammed.
Religion is meant to bring people closer together, not to drive them apart. Religion is meant to gather people into one family, not to split them up into hostile groups. The teaching which declares that any church or any sect has a monopoly of the grace of God is false teaching, for Christ is not the Christ who divides, he is the Christ who unites.
ON FALSE PRETENCES
Matthew 7:21–3
‘Not everyone that says to me: “Lord, Lord” will enter into the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day: “Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name did we not cast out devils, and in your name did we not do many deeds of power?” Then will I publicly announce to them: “I never knew you. Depart from me you doers of iniquity.” ’
THERE is an apparently surprising feature about this passage. Jesus is quite ready to concede that many of the false prophets will do and say wonderful and impressive things.
We must remember what the ancient world was like. Miracles were common events. The frequency of miracles came from the ancient idea of illness. In the ancient world, all illness was held to be the work of demons. People became ill because a demon had succeeded in exercising some malign influence over them or in winning a way into some part of their bodies. Cures were therefore brought about by exorcism. The result of all this was that a great deal of illness was what we would call psychological, as were a great many cures. If people succeeded in convincing—or deluding—themselves into a belief that demons were in them or had them in their power, they would undoubtedly be ill. And if someone could convince them that the hold of the demons was broken, then quite certainly they would be cured.
The leaders of the Church never denied pagan miracles. In answer to the miracles of Christ, the Roman philosopher Celsus quoted the miracles attributed to Aesculapius and Apollo. Writing in the third century, the biblical scholar Origen, who met his arguments, did not for a moment deny these miracles. He simply answered: ‘Such curative power is of itself neither good nor bad, but within the reach of godless as well as of honest people’ (Origen, Against Celsus, 3:22). Even in the New Testament, we read of Jewish exorcists who added the name of Jesus to their repertoire and who banished devils by its aid (Acts 19:13). There was many an impostor who rendered lip-service to Jesus Christ and who used his name to produce wonderful effects on demon-possessed people. What Jesus is saying is that if anyone uses his name under false pretences, the day of reckoning will come. The real motives will be exposed, and that person will be banished from the presence of God.
There are two great permanent truths within this passage. There is only one way in which people’s sincerity can be proved, and that is by their practice. Fine words can never be a substitute for fine deeds. There is only one proof of love, and that proof is obedience. There is no point in saying that we love a person and then doing things which break that person’s heart. When we were young, maybe we used sometimes to say to our mothers: ‘Mother, I love you.’ And maybe our mothers sometimes smiled a little wistfully and said: ‘I wish you would show it a little more in the way you behave.’ So often we confess God with our lips and deny him with our lives. It is not difficult to recite a creed, but it is difficult to live the Christian life. Faith without practice is a contradiction in terms, and love without obedience is an impossibility.
At the back of this passage is the idea of judgment. All through it there runs the certainty that the day of reckoning comes. Some people may succeed over a period in maintaining the pretences and the disguises, but there comes a day when the pretences are shown for what they are, and the disguises are stripped away. We may deceive others with our words, but we cannot deceive God. ‘You discern my thoughts from far away,’ said the psalmist (Psalm 139:2). No one can ultimately deceive the God who sees the heart.
THE ONLY TRUE FOUND
Then Jesus warns against false prophets (vv. 15–23). The false prophets popularize the broad road by advocating a lawless way of life. They are easily recognized, for what they do reveals