Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.12UNLIKELY
Joy
0.62LIKELY
Sadness
0.54LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.37UNLIKELY
Confident
0.48UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.85LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.48UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.7LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.97LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.38UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Some of you are far more faithful than I am; and you could legitimately say to me, “Who are you to tell me about faithfulness?”
I’m not telling you, God’s Word is.
God has brought me back to Ruth again and again.
The writings are meant to be a joy to read.
The writings are filled with positive examples of righteousness.
Even at a time as difficult as the Judges, something good was going on.
Faithfulness is an enduring commitment to love another person or group (not the lovy dovy kind).
Covenant faithfulness.
Steadfast love.
Loving kindness.
Covenant love.
Covenant faithfulness.
The story: My God is King marries Pleasant.
They have two children named Sickness and Destruction.
Hebrew names were not arbitrary, and the original reader were not surprised when they died.
They may have felt a sense of dread when they read that they had married, yet died before having any children.
Theme verse:
Emendation: last act of faithfulness
Young men: choice men
The first faithfulness:
The Test of Faithfulness
Note: kindly: hesed
Naomi makes a proclamation of two daughter-in-laws’ faithfulness.
Saying that they have shown faithfulness both to the dead and Naomi herself.
Both Ruth and Orpah are faithful to Naomi, why?
They were married to her sons.
They were faithful to their new family.
In a sense, a covenant was formed, not just between husband and wife, Ruth and Mahlon, but the families were now united.
She was being faithful to her dead husband.
Naomi makes a proclamation of two daughter-in-laws’ faithfulness.
Saying that they have shown faithfulness both to the dead and Naomi herself (1:8).
Will they stay faithful to their new family, in spite of the death of their husbands and their father-in-law?
This is the test.
Naomi makes a proclamation of two daughter-in-laws’ faithfulness.
Saying that they have shown faithfulness to both the dead and Naomi herself.
Naomi, I’m sure in great grief from having lost her husband and two sons, does not encourage the family to stay together.
At first they are with her all the way:
Naomi is not satisfied with that answer, so she exacerbates the hopelessness of the situation:
Naomi likely is not trying necessarily to hurt her daughters-in-law; she is more likely just trying to get them to do what will allow them to survive.
Orpah comes to simply agree:
I am emphasizing Ruth’s extraordinary faithfulness.
I am not saying that Orpah was evil for her decision, she likely was doing what she thought she had to do to survive.
Ruth put her faithfulness to Naomi above her own needs.
Ruth’s faithfulness endures.
So Naomi tries again:
But Ruth gives hard words to accompany her actions:
Here we see that Ruth’s faithfulness to Naomi is completely self-sacrificing.
Ruth’s religion, people, choices; she put them all behind her so that she could serve her mother-in-law (serve, don’t get the impression that this meant that she just always wanted to hang out with her).
Naomi acts the foil to Ruth in many ways.
In her great mourning, she is very negative when she tells her daughter-in-laws to leave and when she first enters Bethlehem.
She says that she left “full” and came back “empty” with Ruth awkwardly standing in the room.
But Ruth, who has also just lost her husband, is diligent and faithful.
She seeks to provide for her mother in law when they return.
You might think, “I’m not in any kind of situation like this.”
But you are.
Those of you who are married; have you set aside your religion, people, choices for your spouse?
Your God, my God.
Remember that Ruth had a idol-worship background.
Her mother-in-law even asked her to go with her sister and to her gods.
Ruth had to change everything about what she did with her time.
She had to change her fears.
Her joys.
Her moral compass.
She had to change the way she spoke.
Your religion (latin for “yoke,” the thing that attaches the ox to the plow), you have religion outside of worship.
for a lot of husbands these days, it’s video games.
For some, it’s that way they talk.
It’s the tendency to be easily angered or frustrated.
Your ideologies.
The “and that’s that” mentality.
Your people, anyone who get in the way of your relationship.
The relationship is more important that your identity.
Your choices, do you like to get your way?
Is your way better?
Maybe you say: “where you go, I will go, and where you lodge, I will lodge.”
Often, we must give up things that are good.
Note that Ruth does not have an attitude of submission, in fact, she is doing the exact opposite of what Naomi told her to do.
It’s an attitude of wanting to good for another, no matter the cost.
Faithfulness is self-sacrifice.
As we knew from this narrative, and from Leviticus, a widow can still be faithful to her late husband by raising up a child for him through a redeemer.
God isn’t solely interested in our being faithful Him to the neglect of our being faithful to others.
Trying to do so, will end up in not being faithful to Him at all.
Going to church when your sick spouse or child needs you at home.
(Man with the most marriages: Glynn Wolfe, 29, no wives and one of his 40 children attended his funeral and no body claimed his body) (All of my Chinese students (up to 14 and 15 years old) still live with both of their parents).
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9