Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.07UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.03UNLIKELY
Fear
0.03UNLIKELY
Joy
0.66LIKELY
Sadness
0.06UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.62LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.49UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.82LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.43UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.33UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.54LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.26UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Intro
Sometimes the Problem is Not the Truth You’re Telling But the Priority You Assign It
cf.
Ch 12
The Significance of a More Excellent Way
love more important than gufts (reember, tongues preeminent in their minds, but least in list—one with ordered language)
way of life more important than capabilities (spiritual or otherwise
I think this is big problem w/ “hypocrites”—fail to appreciate impact of way of living and what it communicates even thought sometimes misunderstood
Not how explained--
like siri’s explanation of 0 div by 0
maybe, though, here it’s re multiplied by 0
Love is like an activating agent
hand warmers—o2
PVC cement, Ca & Vit D
The Important Question That Flows From Loveless Religion is Simple- What Have You Accomplished
Two Main Reasons That Explain Love’s Central Place in The “More Excellent Way”
No Gift Operates Outside the Context of the Character of the Person Using It
Cf. “Guns don’t kill people...”
CF.
POlice scrutiny lately
CF Kavanaugh Confirmation—concern re: him; concern re: motivations of both parties on commottee—all about how using their tools
Love is Essential to Human Existence ; The Gifts Are Only Remedial
ONly one lasts—b/c the others only help in the mean time
How Can Paul Be So Certain that Love Never Fails?
understand the location of results—not in the effect on the other person but on the lover
If love were gaiged by teh response of the beloved, humans could argue that God loves imperfectly—He failed to make me feel loved
Love is neither driven by feelings nor measured by them—plenty of people have felt loved while they were being used; and plenty of people have felt betrayed while they were being loved
Paul Can Say That Love Never Fails Because Love’s success is in Its expressions
Two notes:
Cessationism
now vs then
Application Plan
vv 4-7—predicate nominative structure
“Love is Patient” is the same as Patient is love”, grammatically speaking..
When all put together
Love can be practiced!
love is patient can also be patient is love...
vv.
4-7—predicate nominative structure
love is patient can also be patient is love...
** rid of sentimental approach to love
Huge statement--”Love never fails.
HOW?
Because love is success in itself!
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9