Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.06UNLIKELY
Joy
0.49UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.2UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.66LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.44UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.26UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.59LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.64LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
CHRISTOLOGY: DOCTRINE OF CHRIST
PREEXISTENCE AND ETERNALITY OF CHRIST
The eternality and deity of Christ are inseparably linked together.
Those who deny His eternality also deny His deity.
If the deity of Christ is established, there is no problem in accepting His eternality.
Direct Proof
New Testament.
Numerous passages in the New Testament explicitly affirm the eternality of Jesus Christ.
(1) John 1:1.
The word “was” in the phrase “In the beginning was the Word” is the Greek hen, the imperfect tense that stresses continual existence in past time.
The phrase could thus be translated, “In the beginning the Word was continually existing.”
John’s beginning probably goes back to the origin of the universe; John indicates that however far back one goes, the Word was continuously existing.1
(2) John 8:58.
Although Abraham lived two thousand years before Christ, He could say, “before Abraham was born, I am.”
Although Jesus was born in Bethlehem, He claimed to have existed before Abraham.
The tense is again important to notice.
Before Abraham was born, Christ was continuously existing.
The statement “I am,” of course, is also a reference to His deity and a claim of equality with Yahweh.
“I am” is a reference to Exodus 3:14, in which God identifies Himself as “I AM WHO I AM.”2
(3) Hebrews 1:8.
The writer of Hebrews begins a series of Old Testament quotations.
The preface to those statements is, “But of the Son He says”; hence, the statements that follow refer to Christ.
Therefore, the statement, “Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever,” is a reference to the eternality of Christ.
(4) Colossians 1:17.
Paul states, “He is before all things,” stressing once more eternality and preexistence of Christ through the use of the present tense.
Old Testament.
(1) Micah 5:2.
This statement emphasizes that “His goings forth are from long ago, from the days of eternity.”
Although Jesus was born in Bethlehem (prophesied in this verse), that was not His beginning; He has existed “from the days of eternity.”
(2) Isaiah 9:6.
Christ is called the “Eternal Father.”
This does not mean Christ is the Father, because they are two distinct persons within the Trinity.
It does mean that Christ also possesses the title of Father.
The designation suggests both His preexistence and eternality.
Indirect Proof
(1) Christ’s heavenly origin proves His eternal existence.
John 3:13 stresses that Christ “descended from heaven.”
If Christ came down from heaven then Bethlehem cannot have been His beginning.
This verse indicates He dwelt in heaven before coming to earth; therefore, He is eternal (cf.
John 6:38).
(2) Christ’s preincarnate work proves His eternal existence.
John 1:3 says that Christ created all things (“all” is emphatic).
If He created all things then He must be eternal (cf. 1 Cor.
8:6).
(3) Christ’s titles prove His eternal existence.
(a) Yahweh.
In John 12:41 the apostle says that Isaiah saw “His glory,” a reference to Christ in the context.
John, however, quoted from Isaiah 6:10 where He is clearly referring to Yahweh (cf.
Isa.
6:3, 5).
John thus equates Jesus with Yahweh, the Lord of the Old Testament; because Yahweh is eternal then Jesus is eternal.
(b) Adonai.
In Matthew 22:44 Christ quotes Psalm 110:1, “The Lord says to my Lord,” and applies it to Himself.
The term “Lord” is Adonai, one of the Old Testament names of God.
If Christ is designated Adonai, then He is eternal, for God is eternal.
(4) The theophanies prove His eternal existence.
A theophany may be defined thus: “It is the Second Person of the Trinity who appears thus in human form.…
The One of the three who is called LORD, or Jahweh, in the incident recorded in Genesis 18, is to be taken to be the Second Person of the Trinity.”3
The identification of Christ with the appearances of the Angel of the Lord (the theophany) can be demonstrated in the following manner.
The Angel of the Lord is recognized as deity.
He is referred to as God (Judg.
6:11, 14; note in verse 11 He is called “angel of the Lord,” while in v. 14 He is called “Lord”).
The Angel of the Lord in other instances is distinct from Yahweh because He talks to Yahweh (Zech.
1:11; 3:1–2; cf.
Gen. 24:7).
The Angel of the Lord could not have been the Spirit or the Father, because neither the Spirit nor the Father are ever revealed in physical form (cf. John 1:18).
The Angel of the Lord no longer appears after the incarnation of Christ.
There is no mention of the Angel of the Lord in the New Testament; He ceases to appear after the birth of Christ.
OLD TESTAMENT PROPHECIES OF CHRIST
Prophecies Concerning Christ’s Lineage4
Virgin birth.
Genesis 3:15 is known as the protevangelium because it is the first prophecy (good news) about Christ.
There will be enmity between Satan and Messiah, here identified by the phrase, “her seed.”
The phrase “her seed” concerns Mary alone and points to the virgin birth; Messiah is born of Mary alone.
Matthew 1:16 also emphasizes this in the phrase “by whom” (Gk.
hes), a feminine relative pronoun, emphasizing Jesus was born without Joseph’s participation.
Line of Shem.
In mentioning the specific name “Lord, The God of Shem” Genesis 9:26 “intimates the preservation of the true religion among the descendants of Shem.”5
The line of Shem will ultimately bring blessing to the lineage of the other two sons of Noah.
Moreover, the more specific name “LORD” (Yahweh) is used, “which refers to his revelation and to his institutions for man’s redemption.”6
The designation “God of Shem” also suggests “that God would sustain to the posterity of Shem a relation entirely peculiar, favoring them with revelations of His will.”
Line of Abraham.
In Genesis 12:2 God promised Abraham, “I will … make your name great,” suggesting Messiah would come from the posterity of Abraham and that “in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”
Matthew 1:1 and Galatians 3:16 interpret this promise (cf.
Gen. 13:15) as being fulfilled in Christ.
Line of Isaac.
It was through the descendants of Isaac that God would establish His covenant and institute His blessings (Gen.
17:19).
Line of Jacob.
The line of messianic blessing narrows further in that the blessing will not flow through Ishmael, but rather through Jacob (Gen.
25:23; 28:13).
Numbers 24:17 stresses a ruler (“scepter”) will come through the descent of Jacob who will crush the enemy and “have dominion” (v.
19; cf.
Rom.
9:10–13).
Line of Judah.
Genesis 49:10 affirms Messiah (as King) will come from the tribe of Judah.
Messiah, of the tribe of Judah, will possess the “scepter.”
“The king held (the scepter) in his hand when speaking in public assemblies; and when he sat upon his throne he rested it between his feet, inclining towards himself.”7
This verse also explains that Judah will sustain a lineage “Until Shiloh comes.”
Shiloh is variously interpreted: as a title of Messiah meaning “Man of rest;”8 of Messiah as “pacifier, peacemaker.”9
Messiah will be a man of peace (cf.
Ps. 72:7; 122:7; Jer.
23:6; Zech.
9:10); the phrase “Until Shiloh comes” may be translated “Until He comes to whom it belongs.”
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9