Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.19UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.65LIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.49UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.76LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.87LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.56LIKELY
Extraversion
0.29UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.75LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.7LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Context
This entire scene is a setup for Jesus trying to turn people against him
Jesus could have called people to depart from the law of Moses- labeling him as an extreme heretic and most likely causing people to turn against him.
While the law of Moses called for the death of those caught in adultery, it does not state stoning as the method- Jesus could be in trouble for this
The woman was the only one brought- Jesus could be in trouble for this
No firsthand witness stepped forward- Jesus could be in trouble for this
Jesus had no authority to call for the death penalty- Jesus could be put to death for treason.
The text says that Jesus was in the Temple
This was most likely the outer court- a common place for teachers to be with their students and followers, and a common place for Jesus to be.
There would be a large group of people there and plenty of activity.
The Sin involved
Today’s passage is another well known story about Jesus- as he interacts with a woman caught in adultery.
A familiar story, today we will hear from this story again.
Jesus finds himself teaching in the outer courts of the temple- a common practice, not just for Jesus, but for many religious teachers in that day.
Filled with people and full of activity, the outer courts of the temple were a known hot spot for people in everyday life.
As Jesus is teaching there comes a group scribes and Pharisees who bring a woman caught in adultery to Jesus- clearly, this is a trap.
The men that day are looking to discount, disprove, or incriminate Jesus.
There are so many things that can go wrong in this situation for Jesus, so he must be wise and discerning with his response.
Consider some of the possible outcomes-
Jesus could have called people to depart from the law of Moses- labeling him as an extreme heretic and most likely causing people to turn against him.
The woman was the only one brought- Jesus could be in trouble for this
No firsthand witness stepped forward- Jesus could be in trouble for this
Jesus had no authority to call for the death penalty- Jesus could be put to death for treason.
Fortunately, Jesus knows that they were not interested in justice, but only trapping him.
So, the woman finds herself in quite the situation.
Can you imagine how she feels?
In the most embarrassing moment of her life, throw into the public square, caught in one of the most ridiculed and promiscuous sins, stuck between the religious institution of the scribes and Pharisees, and Jesus....sounds horrible to me.
Can we be confessional today, church?
Many times the church is not the safest place for those who are the most broken.
Many times when broken people come to the church, we can treat them the same, if not worse, than the world ever does.
In the 1820's, a young woman named Emma gave birth to her first child.
The child was born deformed and died in a matter of hours.
For two weeks, it was uncertain if Emma would live or die.During that time, her husband tried to join a local church.
Local people, knowing his reputation, did not want him.
Some demanded that he specifically repent for his corrupt dealings and occult practices, and it was proper for him to do that, but I am aware of no indication that anyone tried to minister to him or his family.If someone had shared God’s grace with him when he was a broken man, history might have been different.
He might have become a great revival preacher or missionary.
Instead, Joseph Smith went on to found the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Mormons.
He went on to spread a false gospel which has reached around the world, to engage in bloody conflicts, and to wreck lives by claiming women as polygamous wives (including women who already had husbands).
He went from being a local scoundrel to a world class deceiver.If someone had shared God’s grace with Joseph Smith when he was a broken man, history might have been different.
Many times when the ones who need Jesus’ grace the most are placed in front of us, we are the ones with stones in our hands....and across from us stands Jesus…and Jesus does something completely different than the Pharisees...
During that time, her husband tried to join a local church.
Local people, knowing his reputation, did not want him.
Some demanded that he specifically repent for his corrupt dealings and occult practices, and it was proper for him to do that, but I am aware of no indication that anyone tried to minister to him or his family.
Jesus does not do exactly what they were expecting.
First, he stoops down and writes in the dirt.
Now, what he wrote is of little consequence- at least not important enough for John to include it in his account, but can we wonder for a moment?
Just for an exercise in compassion....
Maybe he wrote:
LORD, you are the hope of Israel; all who forsake you will be put to shame.
Those who turn away from you will be written in the dust because they have forsaken the LORD, the spring of living water”
all who forsake you will be put to shame.
Those who turn away from you will be written in the dust
because they have forsaken the LORD,
the spring of living water
Do not spread false reports.
Do not help a guilty person by being a malicious witness.
Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong.
When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd
2 “Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong.
When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd
Have nothing to do with a false charge and do not put an innocent or honest person to death, for I will not acquit the guilty
The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), .
The New International Version (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2011), .
If someone had shared God’s grace with him when he was a broken man, history might have been different.
He might have become a great revival preacher or missionary.
Instead, Joseph Smith went on to found the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Mormons.
He went on to spread a false gospel which has reached around the world, to engage in bloody conflicts, and to wreck lives by claiming women as polygamous wives (including women who already had husbands).
He went from being a local scoundrel to a world class deceiver.
Have nothing to do with a false charge and do not put an innocent or honest person to death, for I will not acquit the guilty
You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.
If someone had shared God’s grace with Joseph Smith when he was a broken man, history might have been different
You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.
Like I said, it is of little consequence, but I do wonder....
While Jesus is writing on the ground the people are still arguing and demanding an answer; they want an indictment!
They want vengeance!
Let’s face it....they want BLOOD.
Jesus wants something else thought; his only words to the crowd that day tell the story “Let you who is without sin cast the first stone.”
Without sin- ἀναμάρτητος (ana-mar-ta-teous) literally means without guilt or having no fault.
You see, we like to categorize sin, right?
When we are confronted with our sinfulness it is easy to start justifying our sin by placing it on a continuum of sins ranging from not-so-bad to grotesque.
For example, if we get caught lying we make ourselves feel better by saying “well at least I am not a murderer” or if we are caught cheating on a work project we justify ourselves by saying “at least I didn’t cheat on my spouse.”
But Jesus takes the stair steps of sin that men create and levels the field- anyone who is FAULTLESS.
Jesus creates two categories- with sin and without sin- PERIOD.
And spoiler alert there is only one person standing in the sinless category and it isn’t you.
And the stones fall....and the only person standing there that has a right to cast a stone stands empty handed and open hearted…this man named Jesus.
Here’s the things church it is okay to name sin.
Jesus’ himself said in that if your brother or sister sins against you go to them and name their sin.
In Paul writes: Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness.
Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted.
2 Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.”
In James’ letter in 5:19-20 he wrote My brothers, if anyone among you wanders from the truth and someone brings him back, 20 let him know that whoever brings back a sinner from his wandering will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.”
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), .
The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton, IL: Crossway Bibles, 2016), .
As people of God we have a responsibility to call out sin, but we do not have a responsibility to punish sin- because we too are sinful people.
In 1960, Israeli undercover agents orchestrated the daring kidnapping of one of the worst of the Holocaust’s masterminds, Adolf Eichmann.
After capturing him in his South American hideout, they transported him to Israel to stand trial.
There, prosecutors called a string of former concentration camp prisoners as witnesses.
One was a small haggard man named Yehiel Dinur, who had miraculously escaped death in Auschwitz.
On his day to testify, Dinur entered the courtroom and stared at the man in the bulletproof glass booth – the man who had murdered Dinur’s friends, personally executed a number of Jews, and presided over the slaughter of millions more.
As the eyes of the two men met – victim and murderous tyrant – the courtroom fell silent, filled with the tension of the confrontation.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9