Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.61LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.73LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.1UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.88LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.94LIKELY
Extraversion
0.55LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.86LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.76LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
2 weeks ago, as some of you know, I went to a preaching workshop in Des Moines with pastor John Mochel. the focus of this workshop was on sermon preparation, not delivery and as such we were expected to bring in home work on two passages.
the homework consisted of 6 questions
How does the context inform the meaning of this passage?
How has the author organized this passage?
State the authors Aim for his audience (in one short sentence)
What parts of this passage connect to the gospel?
What conclusion will you argue to your audience?
and what applications will you make?
What is your sermon title and your preaching outline?
those are hard questions! but they are necessary if you want to, as 2 Timothy 2:15 says “Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth.”
and I don't want to be ashamed!
New American Standard Bible: 1995 update.
(1995).
().
La Habra, CA: The Lockman Foundation.
well my 2 passages were and .
I made my worksheets and presented them and let me tell you I learned a lot!!
I learned in that I need to work on finding the structure of the passage, but in I learned a whole lot more.
I came in feeling pretty good with my work, but wow was I wrong!!
they nailed me to the wall!!! which is why I am using this passage today, I learned so much by being wrong and I want to pass those lessons on to you.
so then Lets look at our passage.
Let’s pray.
I would like to start with where I went wrong so that we can end with the good.
Definations
But first, in order to know what I did wrong I need to explain some terms that they used in the workshop and that I now use.
Firstly we have the Line the Line is the text or the scripture it can mean everything from one verse up to and including the whole of scripture and everything in between.
we can go either above the line or below the line this means that we are either adding to the scripture and what it says or we are taking away from it, either way we are not accepting the authority of scripture, This is bad.
take Eve and the serpent in Genesis.
Eve went above the line in saying that God said we can neither touch nor eat from the tree.
God did indeed say not to eat the fruit, but He never said anything about touching it.
so she added to Gods word and when we do we stray into legalism.
the Serpent on the other hand went below the line when he said “did God really say you cant eat from any tree in the garden?” he is not quite getting to the point the God makes, he isn’t believing the word of God
All of the mistakes that I made were missing the line I missed above and below, but each mistake also falls into a more specific category.
next we have context.
this describes where our text is sitting.
one quote that stuck with me is “Words mean nothing!… outside of context, words mean nothing!”
the context of the passage is not just the verses before and after although that is a very important context.
a very important verse that I missed in my study is eph 5:1-2 lets read that now
the context of the passage is not just the verses before and after although that is a very important context.
a very important verse that I missed in my study is eph 5:1-2 lets read that now
these verses are extremely important to our passage they give us the example of love and submission that our passage talks about!
this fits into every verse from 21-33. it actually fits into ch 6:1-9 as well.
but this is not the only context that we have.
we also have the historical context of our passage in the history of this passage we have that Paul was a prisoner on his way to execution, we have the temple to Artemis, we have the culture.... these help to inform us about what Paul was saying to his audience.
one last context is biblical context this is finding what the book and the bible say about this passage “scripture interprets scripture” if we look at verse 31
one last context is biblical context this is finding what the book and the bible say about this passage “scripture interprets scripture” if we look at verse 31
FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND SHALL BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH.
this is a direct quote from Jesus also quotes this verse in
within this biblical context we have the melodic line.
which is the melody or theme of the book. in Ephesians we have constant themes of unity (specifically in the church) and Jesus’s supremacy, Him ascended and at the right hand of God.
these themes inform our passage.
unity in the church vs 30 and 32
because we are members of His body.
This mystery is great; but I am speaking with reference to Christ and the church.
Jesus’s supremacy in vs 1,2,21,22,23,24,27,29,
this really focus’s the passage on the unity in our relationships, and in the church.
it also shows us who we should live in submission to, namely Christ.
we also have structure, my weakest area.
here we are looking for how God through Paul built this passage.
things that we look for are repetition like submission, love, sacrifice, husband, wife, christ these are all repeated.
also we have connection words like; for, so, but, therefore.... these help us see where he is going and what he is arguing for.
also the Gospel is in every passage in the bible.
and if we just look we can see that scarlet thread of the gospel which is laced through the bible as CH Spurgeon once said
““but do you not know that from every little town and village and tiny hamlet in England there is a road leading to London?
Whenever I get hold of a text, I say to myself, ‘There is a road from here to Jesus Christ, and I mean to keep on His track till I get to Him.'” “Well,” said the young man, “but suppose you are preaching from a text that says nothing about Christ?” “Then I will go over hedge and ditch but what I will get at Him.”
So must we do, brethren; we must have Christ in all our discourses,”
the last one we have is framework.
this can be thought of as a bias, our beliefs, fears and assumptions are all framework.
we take these to the word of God and impose them on the scripture.
these are not always bad.
one framework that we saw in my group was that someone forced the structure into three points, to emphasize the trinity.
the text talked about the trinity, but that was not the main point of the text.
what we need to do is to let the text tell us what our framework should be not the other way.
My Errors
so then what did I do?
I looked at this passage and said “God has setup leadership in our lives and to respect that leadership is to respect Him, leaders must lead in love and humility as Christ leads and those not leading need to follow the leadership as if Christ were the leader, this is a picture of how Christ is leading the church”
that is what I said Paul’s aim was and my sermon title was “Godly leadership at home and abroad”
there are many problems with this.
first I went under the line by missing what the aim was.
if we look at verse 21 we can see Paul’s aim.
21aand be subject to one another in the bfear of Christ.
that, I feel, is what God through Paul is trying to tell us. it changes my whole aim, Godly leadership is great and needed, but there are other passages for that.
THIS passage is about submission and unity!
that I feel is what God through Paul is trying to tell us
and then we have where I went over the line, “Godly leadership at home and abroad” this is not a missions passage!!
so I let my framework and my fear of saying “Submit” take this passage where it was not intended to go.
The Message
let us read this passage again, this time lets look for the structure.
keeping in mind the melodic lines of unity, Christ ascended and supreme.
also remember the aim to “be subject to one another in the fear of Christ.”
we are going to read 5:1-2,then 21-33
that is awesome and humbling!
isnt it?
as we look at this passage we can see a structure the first three verses are about submission the next 5 about love and the last three are a conclusion
Submit v 22
I spent the first few years of my marriage running from God and His call on my life.
this was very hard on Daisy, as she was on fire for God for one of the first times in her life, but I was acting like a boat anchor in our marriage.
it was a rough time!
daisy tried and tried to change me, but if someone is trying to change me it makes me resist all the more I am sure that none of you know about this.
this tug of war went on for a while until daisy was told something.
she was told that submission is not letting someone walk all over you! its ducking, so that God can slap sense into your husband.
so she ducked!
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9