Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.56LIKELY
Sadness
0.14UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.72LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.38UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.88LIKELY
Extraversion
0.11UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.43UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.63LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Let Us Press On
Let Us Press On
(in 5:13) that there are baby Christians and mature Christians.
What's plain from the book of Hebrews is that this writer wants us to press on to be mature Christians, says, "Let us press on to maturity."
He even puts himself in the number: "Let us go on” . . .
" Not just, "You press on . . .
" but, "You and me —let us press on to perfection." his life goal and this is his goal for them.
He is writing and working for this goal.
And so it comes like a bucket of ice water in our faces when we read in verse 3, "This we shall do, if God permits."
What?! If God permits!
What is this if?
Does it mean God possibly may not permit our pressing on to maturity?
verse 3!
Last time dull in their hearing So maybe this bombshell will wake them up.
I hope they (us) woke up at these words—and trembled.
There is a vision of God here —a great, sovereign, all-governing God whom we need very much to see and believe and rest in.
what it is that he may permit or may not permit?
"This" in verse 3: What is he referring to? in verse 1.
Leave the elementary teaching about the Christ.
Press on to maturity.
Don't lay foundations again.
Look back at .
The question is: how does this fit together with where it says, "Leave the elementary teachings and don't lay a foundation again."
One seems to say you need to be taught the basics again (5:12), and the other seems to say you should not lay that foundation again (6:1).
5:12 they need teaching about the basics; 6:1 they should not lay the foundation of the basics again.
So evidently there is a difference between the teaching that they need in 5:12 and the laying again of a foundation in 6:1.
One they need and one they don't.
What's the difference?
the teaching they need about the basics (5:12) is how to use these basics for Christ's sake to press on to maturity.
In this writer's mind, laying a foundation for the understanding of Christ is different from teaching about how to live in Christ on the basis of that foundation.
The foundation he has in mind is described in 6:1d–2.
The striking thing about this list is that it is not distinctively Christian.
It is made up of foundational OT and Jewish truths and practices that the readers probably built on when they were converted.
All these are common Old Testament beliefs or current practices among the Jews.
When these readers were evangelized/converted, these things, it seems, had been made foundational as a way of helping them understand the work of Christ.
Christ is the goal and fulfillment of all these things.
verse 1 "elementary principles of Christ (or literally: "the word of the beginning of Christ"),
- they should not occupy themselves so much with the pre-Christian foundational preparations for Christ that they neglect the glory of the gospel and how to use it to grow into maturity and holiness.
they do need in 5:12 is how to use the basics about Christ to press on to maturity.
In other words, it's what we saw last time from 5:14—they need to learn how to take the milk—the basic truths of the gospel—and practice how to grow with them.
The need is not to rebuild foundational facts, but to stand on them and live by them.
They need to learn how you take basic gospel truth about Christ and use it to become discerning people about good and evil, so that they attain the holiness without which they will not see the Lord (12:14).
Their problem is not lack of foundational knowledge, but lack of fruitfulness in life.
Look at 6:7–8. a word picture:
Here's the issue: has the rain (that is, the milk of the Word) produced thorns and thistles, or has it produced useful vegetation?
In other words have the readers learned how to use the Word of Christ (the milk) to become discerning between good and evil?
The writer is hopeful.
Verse 9: "Beloved, we are convinced of better things concerning you."
They've been dull of hearing and careless in part.
But it's not too late.
There's hope.
But he is not cavalier or absolutely sure what the outcome will be for them.
He wants them to be diligent to have the full assurance of hope (6:11) and the faith and patience and holiness that inherits the promises (6:12; 12:14).
But he does not say it's automatic.
He urges them on.
Verse 1: "Let us press on to maturity!"
And he adds the great qualifier in verse 3: "This we will do, if God permits."
Now let's focus on the implications of those few powerful words: "This we will do, if God permits."
We will press on to maturity if God permits.
Here are five implications of these words.
And this is what it means for God to be God and that we are not God.
1. God governs the progress of sanctification (or maturity).
He has final say in whether we overcome our bent to sinning and make progress toward maturity.
We will press on to maturity if God permits it.
That is, we will make progress in our sanctification and holiness if God permits it.
He decides ultimately if and how fast we advance in holiness.
For example, look at ,
Either God works in us what is pleasing in his sight or he doesn't.
That is, either he permits our progress toward maturity or it doesn't happen.
He governs the progress of sanctification.
Another example is from where the writer tells about Esau who squandered his birthright and his blessing and then tried to repent and couldn't.
Esau was rejected.
He had so profaned the grace of God that he was no longer able to repent even though he wept and looked like he was sincere.
God had forsaken him utterly and there was no more patience This is the precious and terrible warning behind the words,"We will press on to maturity, if God permits."
God governs the progress of sanctification, and he is not obliged to grant repentance to anyone..
2. Permitting us to advance to maturity is all grace, and not permitting it is righteous judgment.
We are by nature rebellious against God and guilty for it.
God does not owe any of us the grace to conquer our rebellion.
If God leaves us in our rebellion, he is righteous and just to do so.
He owes us nothing.
We are rebels by nature, and deserve only punishment, not rescue.
If you are saved this morning, it is all of grace.
And if you persevere and make
progress toward maturity, it is all of grace.
"This we will do, if God permits."
And if he chooses not to permit it, he is not hindering our good will, he is leaving us in our bad will.
If we have a good will toward God, this is the work of grace and we will make progress.
And we should tremble with gratitude.
3. God sometimes wills that something come to pass which he forbids us to bring to pass.
GOD sometimes decrees what he forbids.
The clearest illustration of this in biblical history is God's plan for the death of Jesus.
God forbids murder: "Thou shalt not murder" ().
And he decrees that his Son be murdered.
:
What Herod and Pilate and the Roman soldiers and the crowds shouting,
"Crucify him," did was all predestined to occur by God, and it was all sin.
Thus God sometimes forbids what
he decrees: he forbids murder, and he decrees the murder of his Son
for the salvation of his people.
The cross of Christ is the clearest place for seeing this mystery.
There are infinitely wise and holy reasons for willing that
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9