Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.06UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.63LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.57LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.22UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.83LIKELY
Extraversion
0.11UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.73LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.77LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
We have just heard the Christmas story told through the words of Scripture through the readings we have heard as well as the Hymns that were sung by our Choir as well as our congregational singing as well as through the nativity scene as it was laid out by the kids.
What we have heard is the true meaning of Christmas, the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ as it is written in Scripture.
And the participants did a wonderful job of presenting this.
Now I want to take the time we have left to flesh out the very last passage that was read.
It was , though I am expanding that to verse 7. Now Paul wrote to the Galatians, a group of churches in the province of Galatia which is located in what is now Turkey.
Paul had visited there and preached the gospel of Jesus Christ to them and they received it and believed in Jesus (4:13,14) IN fact, they received the message he gave as if he were Christ Himself.
However, some years had passed since he had been among them and there were false teachers who had been passing bad theology off as good teaching.
They were saying you needed something more than just belief in Jesus in order to be a true believer.
They were adding to the gospel which teaches that salvation is by faith alone in Christ alone by grace alone, ,.
Thus, Paul is writing this letter to them to call them back to the true gospel.
And that my friend is what he is reminding them of in our text.
This text is really easy to follow as far as an outline, because it flows right out of the verses rather than my mind.
In these verse we see the real meaning of Christmas and its purpose.
So I am going to lay it out like this, and we could spend a couple sermons on each of these but we won’t.
I have to get through this in today.
So it is an abbreviation.
God Sent His Son, v.4,5 God became Flesh and came Himself
God Sent the Spirit of His son, v.6
Those who believe by faith become His sons, v.6, 7
This is why we celebrate Christmas - that we might believe that God sent His Son so that we might become Sons.
[You ladies might say why doesn’t Paul say Sons and Daughters?
Well he answered that in 3:27, 28 READ THIS.
because there is no distinction between male and female.
In other words, he means both in our text.
]
So this is a very simple outline that flows from the text so if you get lost you can find your way back.
I. God sent His Son, v.4,5
A. At the right time,
but when the fullness of time came
What is this ‘fullness of time’ stuff.
What is he referring to?
When you go back and read the verses before this, even into the previous chapter you will see that Paul had been comparing the Judaic law to a prison warden a pedagogue/tutor.
Now he changes to a guardian or steward.
What he is doing is using the analogy of a son becoming a man to help us understand what Christ was doing when He came in the fullness of time.
In that culture, there was a time in which a young boy became a man, when he would no longer be treated as a boy but as an adult.
Even though the child owned the whole estate, he was still kept like a slave.
He had no freedom and could make no decisions.
He was under a guardian who protected him and under a steward who watched over him financially.
He was under this system until a time appointed by his father when he would be acknowledged as a son and heir.
There was usually a ceremony marking this occasion.
i) In the Jewish world, on the first Sabbath after a boy had passed his twelfth birthday, his father took him to the Synagogue, where he became A Son of the Law.
The father thereupon uttered a benediction, “Blessed be thou, O God, who has taken from me the responsibility for this boy.”
The boy prayed a prayer in which he said, “O my God and God of my fathers!
On this solemn and sacred day, which marks my passage from boyhood to manhood, I humbly raise my eyes unto thee, and declare with sincerity and truth, that henceforth I will keep thy commandments, and undertake and bear the responsibility of mine actions towards thee.”
There was a clear dividing line in the boy’s life; almost overnight he became a man.
(ii) In Greece a boy was under his father’s care from seven until he was eighteen.
He then became what was called an ephebos, which may be translated cadet, and for two years he was under the direction of the state.
The Athenians were divided into ten phratriai, or clans.
Before a lad became an ephebos, at a festival called the Apatouria, he was received into the clan; and at a ceremonial act his long hair was cut off and offered to the gods.
Once again, growing up was quite a definite process.
(iii) Under Roman law the year at which a boy grew up was not definitely fixed, but it was always between the ages of fourteen and seventeen.
At a sacred festival in the family called the Liberalia he took off the toga prætexta, which was a toga with a narrow purple band at the foot of it and put on the toga virilis, which was a plain toga which adults wore.
He was then conducted by his friends and relations down to the forum and formally introduced to public life.
It was essentially a religious ceremony.
And once again there was a quite definite day on which the lad attained manhood.
There was a Roman custom that on the day a boy or girl grew up, the boy offered his ball, and the girl her doll, to Apollo to show that they had put away childish things.
When a boy was an infant in the eyes of the law, he might be the owner of a vast property but he could take no legal decision; he was not in control of his own life; everything was done and directed for him; and, therefore, for all practical purposes he had no more freedom than if he were a slave; but when he became a man he entered into his full inheritance.
The letters to the Galatians and Ephesians.
2000, c1976 (W.
Barclay, lecturer in the University of Glasgow, Ed.).
The Daily study Bible series, Rev. ed.
(33).
Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.
This initial statement but when the fullness of time came speaks to purposeful timing.
It was not arbitrary.
It was right on time, at the right time.
When everything that needed to happen before this did happen.
Christ’s incarnation was not just a stab in the dark as to timing.
It was exactly as God had planned it.
This initial statement but when the fullness of time came speaks to purposeful timing.
It was not arbitrary.
It was right on time, at the right time.
When everything that needed to happen before this did happen.
Christ’s incarnation was not just a stab in the dark as to timing.
It was exactly as God had planned it.
when you think about it practically, the pax romana set the world stage as a perfect time for him to come: common language, favorable travel making the communication and spread of the gospel much easier.
But more importantly, in the providence of God this was the best time for the Son of God to be revealed.
This is the culmination of and fulfillment of many OT prophecies.
He is putting it this way to contrast what we were formerly, the analogy is that we were like heirs that were too young to rule, and were no better than slaves under a steward.
But at the appointed time of the father we entered a new authority, Not a new relationship, because we were always sons, chosen before the foundation of the world.
But signifies a new relationship to the world around us.
Now we are free, not treated as slaves to the world in need of stewards.
That change is facilitated by
B. God Sent forth His Son
God sent forth His Son -(cf.
v.6) the word sent forth shows that the Son comes out of the Father it is the GK εξαπεστειλεν a compound word whose root is apostello which we get apostle from and the preposition ek which means out of.
So we could easily translate this sent out from, meaning that He came from God.
It emphasizes His deity, God didn’t just send His Son from Heaven to earth, He came Himself, ,.
He is sent with a purpose, He is commissioned with a message and purpose.
And that was to redeem us as we see in v.5.
We also see in this passage the Trinity: God the Father, who sends out from Himself the Son (incarnation) and the Spirit (v.6) at Pentecost and then when a person believes the Sprit indwells them.
Thus, affirming the believer as sons or daughters and affirming they are heirs of the promise.
He elaborates on this incarnation in two ways:
1. Virgin Birth,
--born of a woman- speaking of the virgin birth, the Prophecy of Moses in ; as to the promise to Abraham a son, a descendant that is Christ ; Then we have the prophecy of ; which was a promise to Israel during the rebellious days of King Ahaz of Judah as he faced the armies of the Alliance between Syria and the Northern tribes of Israel.
God promised King Ahaz that this enemy would not stand and as proof God told him a virgin would conceive and bear a son, that Son would be Immanuel.
Jesus is teh fulfillment of that promise, , establishing He is God and then affirmed in the announcement to the shepherds in .
2. Under the law,
Satisfying/fulfilling of the law’s requirements --Born under the law - totally submissive to the demands of the Law.
He kept the law and fulfilled it, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”
He satisfied the law, by suffering the penalty for sin.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9