Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.18UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.24UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.25UNLIKELY
Confident
0.11UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.8LIKELY
Extraversion
0.25UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.47UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.73LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
*Sermon Worksheet & Manuscript*
*Robert L. Hutcherson, Jr.*
*Quinn** Chapel A.M.E.
Church*
*                                        Sermon Preparation~/Delivery*
                                                      *Acts 1:1-11*
*/“Staring Upwards”/*
*The Rev. Karla J. Cooper, **Pastor*
*May 20, 2007*
\\                                              *Seventh Sunday of Easter*
\\ Sermon Worksheet & Manuscript
*TEXT*
*Acts 1:1-11*
* *
 
*BODY*
* *
*Anyone who has attended a management seminar in the past several years or so has heard about a thing called a paradigm.
A paradigm is simply your and my accustomed way of looking at the world.
A paradigm is a perspective that causes us to focus on certain things and interpret those things we focus on in a certain way.
A paradigm is the way we interact with reality -- which means that a faulty paradigm can cause us to miss what is really going on.*
* *
*Let me share with you a true story that may be familiar to you.
It illustrates the power of a paradigm.
*
* *
*The nation of Switzerland dominated the world of watchmaking for over sixty years.
The Swiss made the best watches in the world.
Anyone who wanted a good watch, an accurate watch, bought a Swiss watch.
The Swiss didn't just rest on their laurels either.
They continually worked at making better watches.
They were constant innovators.*
* *
*By 1968 they had done so well that they had more than 65 percent of the unit sales in the world watch market and more than 80 percent of the profits.
They were the world leaders in watchmaking by an enormous stretch.
No one was even a close second.*
* *
*But by 1980 their market share had collapsed from 65 percent to less than 10 percent.
Their profit domination had dropped to less than 20 percent.
They had been dethroned as the world market leader because they had run into a change in the fundamental rules.
The mechanical watch mechanism was about to give way to quartz electronics.
And everything the Swiss were good at -- making gears and bearings and mainsprings -- was irrelevant to the new rules.*
* *
*In less than ten years, the Swiss watchmaking future, which had seemed so secure, so profitable, so dominant, was destroyed.
Between 1979 and 1981, fifty thousand of the sixty-two thousand Swiss watchmakers lost their jobs.
The Japanese took over first place.
Today the Japanese have about 33 percent of the market.
*
* *
*Now the irony of this story is that the collapse was totally avoidable.
It was totally avoidable -- because it was the Swiss themselves who invented the electronic quartz movement for watches at their research institute in Neuchatel.
They invented it.
But when the Swiss researchers presented this revolutionary new idea to the Swiss manufacturers in 1967, it was rejected.
It was rejected because it did not fit their watch making paradigm.
*
* *
*After all, it didn't have a mainspring, it didn't need bearings, it required almost no gears, it was battery-powered, it was electronic.
It couldn't possibly be the watch of the future.
The manufacturers let their researchers showcase their useless invention at the World Watch Congress that year.
Seiko took one look, and the rest is history.*
* *
*If you read the ascension story carefully, it isn't about continuity, but discontinuity.
It's not so much about Jesus' universal presence as his absence.
What Luke tells us is that Jesus physically left this world and the disciples stood gaping into heaven.
What does this mean for us?
*
*In our New Testament passage from Acts 1, we see Jesus disciples as they are about to enter a very profound paradigm shift -- a movement in the way they see the world.
Their old way of looking at things is about to be shattered.
*
* *
*As we open the Book of Acts, the Disciples have gone through the experience of the Last Supper, the crucifixion, and the resurrection.
They have spent forty days with the resurrected Christ.
Now they are on their way to the top of the Mount of Olives where Jesus will ascend back into heaven.
*
* *
*They have seen it all.
They have done it all.
They have heard it all.
But they still see things upside down.
We know this by the question they ask Jesus in verse 6: "Lord, at this time are you going to restore the kingdom to Israel?"*
* *
*What does this question mean?*
* *
*It means that in spite of everything that has happened to them -- in spite of the crucifixion and in spite of the resurrection -- they are still being shaped by their old paradigm that told them what the Messiah was going to be.
It is not amazing that the Disciples asked this question.
But it is amazing when they asked this question -- after the resurrection.
But that is the power of a paradigm to shape how we read reality -- to shape our interpretation of events.
*
* *
*As we open Acts 1, what is the disciple’s Messiah paradigm?*
* *
*Like the rest of Israel, the Disciples are still looking for the Messiah to be the political and military leader of their one small nation -- to restore the glory that Israel had known in world affairs a thousand years before during the time of King David.
With their Acts 1:6 question, it is almost like they are saying that what has just happened doesn’t matter.
"This crucifixion and this resurrection were interesting -- but now its time for You to get about the important stuff.
It’s time for you to get the Romans out of our land."*
* *
*In asking their question, the Disciples show that they are still mentally stuck at Palm Sunday.
They haven’t yet moved on to Good Friday and Easter.
For their concept of the Messiah was the theme of what happened on Palm Sunday.
*
* *
*As Jesus entered the City of Jerusalem it became a political demonstration.
The gospels tell us that the people stripped palm branches off of the trees to wave at Jesus.
They cried "Hosanna to the Son of David."*
* *
*Why "Hosanna?"
Hosanna means "Lord save!" -- not save us from our sins but save us from our corrupt earthly rulers -- from our position of political and military weakness.
"Lord, at this time will you restore the kingdom the Israel?"
That’s a good Palm Sunday question.
But the fact that the Disciples are still asking this same question in Acts 1 shows that even after the resurrection the Disciples are living in the paradigm of Palm Sunday.
They still believe that all that has happened is for the fulfillment of their own narrow, national agenda.
Even as that walk with the risen Christ, this is what they believe.*
* *
*That is what they will continue to believe until God opens their eyes at Pentecost.
The Disciples will only understand what really happened on Good Friday and at Easter when God opens their minds to a new way of seeing by sending them the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost as recorded in Acts 2.*
* *
*And I believe that God will use his Holy Spirit in us the same way -- to give us a new way of looking at reality, learning to embrace the wider Kingdom of Jesus Christ - which means that we are going to learn to celebrate what God is doing in our world, our nation, and our local community.
That’s a great theme, Because God is up to a lot more in this area than what we see only through our one local church -- just as God was up to much more in Jesus than ‘restoring the kingdom to Israel."*
* *
*The ultimate gift of the ascension was that through him our human body entered the throne room of God.
When his wounded, risen body ascended to be seated at God's right hand, Jesus imported human flesh and blood into the very heavenly presence of God.
By ascending bodily into God's presence he affirms what the Creation story told us-- that flesh and blood are good, not bad, that they are good enough for Jesus, good enough for heaven, good enough for God.
By clothing himself with our humanity and keeping it on, Jesus not only brought God to us; he brought us to God.
As the great ascension hymn sings: "You have raised our human nature on the clouds to God's right hand; there we sit in heavenly places, there with you in glory stand."
This is the culmination of Jesus journey of salvation, and it's the culmination of ours too.
*
* *
*The victorious Lamb who arrives in heaven to shouts of acclamation is our human brother.
And with his place before God our mission in the world takes on new meaning.
Nothing that happens in this world is so bleak, so tragic, that it can thwart the joy and hope that proceeds from the heart of God, now touched by our humanity.
All the worlds' tears and pain are borne to God's very heart by the presence of our ascended brother and friend.
*
* *
*That's all wonderful, but still, when it comes right down to it, we're the ones left behind gazing up into the sky.
We're not left behind in the sense of those fabulously popular, but to my mind, unbiblical novels.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9