Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.15UNLIKELY
Joy
0.53LIKELY
Sadness
0.48UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.57LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.51LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.82LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.58LIKELY
Extraversion
0.13UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.82LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.58LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Imagine for a moment that you are in prison, falsely accused of treason.
You have seen three fellow prisoners executed on the same charge.
You know that your prospects of release are remote.
.........................
Paul experienced human needs
The opening paragraph present the deeply human side of the apostle Paul.
Although he was one of the most remarkable human beings in history, here we see a distinctly human Paul.
He longed to see Timothy
Paul addressed the letter affectionate to Timothy, whom he considered his true son in the Lord.
He was writing from a Roman prison and knew that his time might be short.
In fact, he did not expect to be released.
In the mould of a real father, he longed to see Timothy.
As Paul concludes his letter to his dear and true son, his longing to see Timothy one last time is overwhelming.
In verse 9 he tells Timothy to come to him quickly.
At the end of the passage, after passing greetings to various friends and colleagues in Ephesus, he repeats the instruction.
Now, if you are in Johannesburg and you hear that your father is near death in Cape Town, you buy a ticket and in a few hours you touch down in CT—a journey of about 1500 km, two hours flying time.
It’s no biggie.
As the crow flies, the distance from Rome to Ephesus is about 1350 km; if you drive, since cars don’t travel easily over water, it would take you about 30 hours driving time.
Timothy wasn’t a crow and he didn’t own a car, so getting there in Paul’s day was a serious biggie.
It was a journey of some 2000 km by foot.
a journey of about 1500 km,
What would it take for Timothy to get from Ephesus to Rome?
Contextualise the magnitude of the request by presenting the arduous realities of the journey using maps and explanations of the travel options.
This will need some research on my part.
At this point, you might be thinking: But wait a minute!
This whole time we have been learning that Paul is writing to tell Timothy how to sort out problems in Ephesus, especially those caused by false teachers.
Suddenly, you telling me that Paul really wants Timothy to leave Ephesus and come quickly to see him in Rome.
How can this be?
Isn’t Paul contradicting himself?
The sceptics and scoffers, unbelieving theologians who distrust the Scriptures, would make exactly this argument.
The same sceptics and scoffers argue that the scores of names we read in is evidence that the letter is a forgery; the author is citing known companions of Paul’s to give the letter a sense of authenticity.
Same sceptics argue that Ephesians cannot be genuine because it lacks references to Paul’s known companions.
So let’s get this straight: If the letter mentions lots of Paul’s friends by name, he could not have written it, but if it mentions none of them, he could not have written it.
I am reminded of the Pharisees who rejected John the Baptist because he refused to drink alcohol but then rejected Jesus because he did.
In both cases, their minds were made up beforehand.
This is not the way we should treat Jesus, Paul, or anyone else.
Instead of assuming the letter is guilty until proven innocent, let’s give it the benefit of the doubt.
Let’s assume Paul wrote it and ask if it is possible that he wanted Timothy to both sort things out in Ephesus and come to see him before winter.
Is it plausible that Paul was hoping for the both/and scenario?
It sure is possible.
In fact, it is more than possible; it is the plain meaning of the letter and the normal inclination of a man who is both an apostle of Christ Jesus and a spiritual father to Timothy.
The apostle wants the church secure; the father longs to see his son.
Paul had a plan.
Let’s see how he worked it out.
Firstly, in verse 12, he says:
Clearly, Tychicus had been with Paul in Rome, but now Paul had sent him to Ephesus.
Tychicus features prominently in Paul’s letters.
He was from Ephesus and travelled with Paul (see ).
He was also the man who previously delivered Paul’s letters to the the Ephesians and to the Colossians.
Paul spoke fondly and favourably about him.
Eph
We might ask, “Why had Paul sent Tychicus to Ephesus?”
The reasons seem obvious.
Firstly, Tychicus was carrying this letter to Timothy.
Secondly, Tychicus was to relieve Timothy in Ephesus so that Timothy could come to Paul.
A couple of years earlier, Paul said exactly the same thing to Titus.
The picture is fairly clear.
Tychicus would deliver the letter containing Paul’s counsel to Timothy.
Timothy would implement it and transition the task to Tychicus.
The letter served the needs of both men in carrying out Paul’s counsel, since time was tight for Timothy to get to Rome before winter.
He feared the approaching winter
On the assumption that … the cloak
..............
He needed the Word of God
Describe the scrolls and the parchments, including the uncertainty around them, concluding that they were most likely Paul’s Bible.
In 1535, immured by the persecutor at Vilvorde in Belgium, he wrote, not long before his fiery martyrdom, a Latin letter to the Marquis of Bergen, Governor of the Castle: “I entreat your lordship, and that by the Lord Jesus, that if I must remain here for the winter you would beg the Commissary to be so kind as to send me, from the things of mine which he has, a warmer cap; I feel the cold painfully in my head.
Also a warmer cloak, for the cloak I have is very thin.
He has a woollen shirt of mine, if he will send it.
But most of all, my Hebrew Bible, Grammar and Vocabulary, that I may spend my time in that pursuit.”
(John Stott, The Message of 2 Timothy, quoting Handley Moule)
There is a brand of Christian that despises reading and learning.
They tend to be super-spiritual, pretending that the Holy Spirit’s illumination is all they need.
This is not a new trend.
Listen to John Calvin responding to this in his comments on our passage:
Still more does this passage refute the madness of the fanatics who despise books and condemn all reading and boast only of their enthusiasmous, their private inspirations by God.
But we should note that this passage commends continual reading to all godly men as a thing from which they can profit.
(Quoted in Stott, The Message of 2 Timothy)
Just as Paul could not bear to die without seeing Timothy again, so too he could not bear to live without the Word of God.
He felt a gaping hole in his life when he was not “in the Word.”
Matt
Quote by Jefferson from CR materials about being “in the Word.”
Quote by Jefferson from CR materials about being “in the Word.”
What a challenge for us?
We have ready access to dozens of Bibles and tools on our phones and computers, yet we are too lazy or too indifferent to read them.
William Tyndale was burned alive for translating the first of those English Bibles.
Paul was beheaded for preaching its message.
Are we too busy watching TV or wasting the day away on FB to spend time reading and studying God’s Word?
Paul endured painful opposition
Paul preached powerful messages
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9