Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.08UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.01UNLIKELY
Joy
0.66LIKELY
Sadness
0.16UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.26UNLIKELY
Confident
0.78LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.81LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.19UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.46UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.96LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.21UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Sharing in the fellowship of God’s love
See also ; ; ;
Sharing in the fellowship of a common devotional life
Worshipping together
See also ; ; ;
Praying together
See also ; ;
Breaking bread together
; ; Love feasts accompanied the Lord’s Supper though these were open to abuse.
True fellowship means sharing with those in need
See also ;
Showing hospitality
See also ; ; ;
Sharing money and possessions
;
See also God’s people are to reflect his concern for the needy in society; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Examples of sharing with the needy
Job’s compassion for the needy; the daily distribution to widows; Tabitha’s concern for the poor
The collection for believers in Judea:
; ;
Strengthening one another in fellowship together
Bearing with the weak
See also ; ; ;
Strengthening the weak
See also
Encouraging one another
See also ; ; ;
Putting the needs of others first
See also ;
True fellowship means living in harmony
See also ; ; ;
Showing equal concern for all
; ;
Examples of fellowship
Moses and Hobab; David and Jonathan; Jehu and Jehonadab
Failure to exhibit true fellowship
Troublemakers in David’s army are unwilling to share the spoils; factions within the church at Corinth; Selfishness at love feasts humiliates the poor.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9