Commandments, Traditions and what defiles us.

Notes
Transcript
Sermon Tone Analysis
A
D
F
J
S
Emotion
A
C
T
Language
O
C
E
A
E
Social
View more →

Commandments, Traditions and what defiles us.

John 1:12 ESV
But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God,
“Simon says” that most children eventually learn to play. The object the game is to listen clearly and obey quickly but to only do what “Simon says.”
I would suggest to you that as believers we develop something similar that we might call “God says”. The object of this exercise would be to list some things that are clear commands in God’s word, but in the midst of the God says, to slip a supposed command that might be good but God did not command it or Jesus did not say that. But our version of the “God says, we would begin with our Bibles open and leave them open if God, Jesus or the Bible says that in the case of a statement not being true, we would raise our hand with a closed Bible. So in our version, every statement would begin with God says. The question did God, say it, did Jesus says, is this a truth clearly taught in the Word.
The “God says” challenge might go something like this
God says, “You shall have no other Gods before me.” Ex 20:3
God says, “You shall not murder.”
The Bible says that Eve took an apple from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil - - not an apple - unnamed fruit
Jesus says,
Matthew 5:21–22 ESV
“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.
Matt
Jesus says, “Whatever you wish that others would do unto you, do also unto them.
The Bible says that when Jesus was a child, 3 kings from the east visited Joseph, Mary and Jesus at a home in Bethlehem - , - not really kings - wise men, magi, astrologers
The primary meaning of Hebrew 10:25 is that believers should not forsake meeting together as a church
Hebrews 10:25 ESV
not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.
Heb
NOT REALLY - while gathering together as church - Sunday is the by product, the context is stirring up good works and warning each other of sinful behaviour.
Hebrews 10:24 ESV
And let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works,
Heb 10:
Hebrews 10:26 ESV
For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
The church - called out - assemble for a purpose.
One of the main purposes is what does the word says and what do we need to do? The believers in understood that.
Acts 17:11 ESV
Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.
When we do not know what God said, what Jesus said, what the Scriptures says and how to weigh what religious leaders say we should do, there will inevitably be tension and conflict.
In a sense, that is what was happening in the first part of . Except when it came to the Pharisees and scribes, to “What does God say?” and “What does God command?” they added, “What do the Elders say/tradition?” as the trump card for everything. For the Pharisees, scribes and religious leaders of that day, nothing was more important than the tradition of the Elders. While what God commanded was important, it was the Elders’ teaching and tradition that had to be remembered and obeyed.
Mark’s record record of this next section begins with a preamble that ends with question posed by the Pharisees and scribes. This was the second question that Jesus was asked with regard to His disciples. The first was asked people with regard to fasting.
Mark 2:18 ESV
Now John’s disciples and the Pharisees were fasting. And people came and said to him, “Why do John’s disciples and the disciples of the Pharisees fast, but your disciples do not fast?”
Mk 2:
When believers do something that deviates from the accepted norm there will be questions.
Worship on the first day of the week rather than the Sabbath.
When we meet.
Psalms, hymns and spiritual songs
Style of worship - traditional, contemporary, blended - drums/no drums
It is natural for questions to be asked. With the questions need to ask what prompted the questions.
The Pharisees and scribe’s question.
Mark 7:5 ESV
And the Pharisees and the scribes asked him, “Why do your disciples not walk according to the tradition of the elders, but eat with defiled hands?”
Mk
With the increasing impact of Jesus’ministry, He was now approached by 2nd group of Jewish religious leaders that had come from Jerusalem.
Previous group - scribes from Jerusalem -
This might have been in some way the result of the Pharisees in Capernaum - near Gennesaret - consulting with the Herodians how to destroy Jesus -
Their question had nothing to do with hygiene and germs and washing dirty, grimy hands before eating. It not about germs, if they had any sense of germs and infectious disease. It was all about ceremonial cleanness and ritual. It involved ceremonial washing.
For the average person, there was no OT commandment for this. The exception would be for priests before entering the tabernacle.
Exodus 30:19 ESV
with which Aaron and his sons shall wash their hands and their feet.
Ex
Exodus 40:13 ESV
and put on Aaron the holy garments. And you shall anoint him and consecrate him, that he may serve me as priest.
There was further direction for priests who came in contact with something unclean -
Those who were not priests and came in contact with a bodily discharge, were expected to wash themselves and their clothes. - - Having mentioned that, the washing here so as not to be defiled is all about ceremony. There hands were deemed defiled, unclean - according to the tradition of the Elders.
In his study Bible notes, Dr MacArthur explained, “The ceremony involved someone pouring water out of a jar onto anothers’s hands, whose fingers would be pointing up. As long as the water dripped off at the wrist, the person could proceed to the next step. The water was then poured over both hands with the fingers pointed down. Then each hand was to be rubbed with the fist of the other hand.”
In Jesus’ day, the Elders of the Pharisees had compiled a very long list of what made one unclean,
The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel according to Mark Recovering the True Intent of the Law (7:1–23)

Next to the Qumran community, the Pharisees were the most scrupulous sect of Judaism with regard to matters of cleanness. Unclean for Pharisaic rabbis were any form of human excretion (spittle, semen, menstruation, etc.), women after childbirth, corpses, carrion, creeping things, idols, and certain classes of people, such as lepers, Samaritans, and Gentiles. This list implicates both Jesus and the disciples of several earlier violations of ritual uncleanness, since they have been with lepers (1:40), tax collectors (2:13), Gentiles (5:1), menstruating women (5:25), and corpses (5:35). Ritual washings were a means of cleansing and protecting observant Jews from the above defilements. (Further on the Pharisees, see at 2:18.)

Most of this was totally arbitrary and is many cases ridiculous.
The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel according to Mark Recovering the True Intent of the Law (7:1–23)

It is important to understand that “cleanness” was not limited to or even primarily concerned with matters of hygiene, nor are distinctions between clean and unclean entirely understandable on the basis of rational explanation alone. The Mishnah, for instance, declared that the Aramaic sections of Daniel and Ezra rendered the hands of anyone who touched them unclean, as did the Holy Scriptures themselves if they were translated into Assyrian. On the other hand, translating the Aramaic sections of Scripture into Hebrew made them clean (m. Yad. 4:5). This text is one of many instances indicating that “cleanness” was a ritual or cultic distinction as opposed to a practical or hygienic distinction.

The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel according to Mark Recovering the True Intent of the Law (7:1–23)

One way to convey the power of the Jewish distinction between clean and unclean, perhaps, is to draw a parallel with authoritarian societies and organizations, where people avoid all contact with a person who is under suspicion or who has been fired, for example, so as not to endanger their own position.

So precise were there ceremonial washings of the Elders that in verse 4, they washed - immersed - baptiso.
Mark also mentioned that the Elders had other prescribed traditions.
Mark 7:4 ESV
and when they come from the marketplace, they do not eat unless they wash. And there are many other traditions that they observe, such as the washing of cups and pots and copper vessels and dining couches.)
The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel according to Mark Recovering the True Intent of the Law (7:1–23)

To modern readers the cleansing of objects listed in 7:2–5 may appear exaggerated. Some may even suspect Mark of anti-Jewish polemic. Neither appears to be the case, however. A variety of evidence from the first century essentially corroborates the Pharisaic obsession with purity as described by Mark. Jacob Neusner notes that the dominant trait of Pharisaism before A.D. 70, as depicted in both rabbinic traditions and the Gospels, concerns conditions regarding ritual purity. It is worth remembering that fully twenty-five percent of the Mishnah is devoted to questions of purity. Archaeological excavations continue to discover Jewish mikwa’ot or cleansing pools that were a standard feature of Jewish homes and settlements in the first century (see Mishnah, tractate Mikwa’ot). Mikwa’ot have even been uncovered on the summit of Masada, one of the most arid places on earth.

2. Jesus’ statement explaining the problem with their question.
Mark 7:6 ESV
And he said to them, “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written, “ ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me;
Mark 7:8 ESV
You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men.”
Mark 7:8 ESV
You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men.”
Mk
Statement not a question
Scriptural basis -
An example of how they - the Elders - rejected the commandment of God to establish tradition.
Commandment of God - ;
Tradition of man - Corban - give to God
Making void the word of God
Many such things you do.
We should note that Jesus answered their question with the Word of God. Although in their eyes, Jesus was without credentials, the Word of God the prophets were regarded as having almost as much authority as the Pentateuch. Jesus did not the Elders or the Talmud, He referred to the Scriptures, which are our final authority. When Isaiah prophesied about hypocrites like you.
Isaiah 29:13 ESV
And the Lord said: “Because this people draw near with their mouth and honor me with their lips, while their hearts are far from me, and their fear of me is a commandment taught by men,
Some have suggested that there is also an indirect reference to Ezekiel, the prophet
Ezekiel 33:31 ESV
And they come to you as people come, and they sit before you as my people, and they hear what you say but they will not do it; for with lustful talk in their mouths they act; their heart is set on their gain.
E
In referring the Pharisees and scribes, Jesus was borrowing a term from Greek theater that was less offensive than it would today. He was saying that you are wearing a mask to play your part. Your ideals are ideal but your worship is vain and you are not sincere
Jesus point was clear. They left the commandment of God but held the tradition of men.
Mk
Mark 7:8 ESV
You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men.”
Jesus then reminded them of an Elders Tradition that made void the Word of God.
Command of God
Exodus 20:12 ESV
“Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you.
Ex
Exodus 21:17 ESV
“Whoever curses his father or his mother shall be put to death.
Ex21
Tradition of men - not Elders - presbuteros - Corban - devoted to God
Deferred giving
The Pillar New Testament Commentary: The Gospel according to Mark Recovering the True Intent of the Law (7:1–23)

Corban was similar to the concept of deferred giving. Today a person may will property to a charity or institution at his or her death, though retaining possession over the property and the proceeds or interest accruing from it until then. In the case of Corban, a person could dedicate goods to God and withdraw them from ordinary use, although retaining control over them himself. In the example of v. 11, a son declares his property Corban, which at his death would pass into the possession of the temple. In the meantime, however, the son retains control over the property—and his control deprives his parents of the support that otherwise would have been derived from the property in their old age. T. W. Manson’s description of the practice is particularly trenchant: “A man goes through the formality of vowing something to God, not that he may give it to God, but in order to prevent some other person from having it.” This was not the end of the matter, however. Once property had been offered to God, priests discouraged anyone from withdrawing it from Corban in order to return it to human use. According to Josephus, priests required fifty shekels from a man, and thirty from a woman, to cancel Corban (Ant. 4.73). The practice of Corban resulted in egregious casuistry by annulling a moral commandment of the Torah (honor of parents) by a ritual practice of the oral tradition (Corban).

Make void the word of God
Make void the word of God
Many such things you do - are doing - present tense.
3. Jesus’ parable.
Mark 7:14–15 ESV
And he called the people to him again and said to them, “Hear me, all of you, and understand: There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.”
Related Media
See more
Related Sermons
See more