Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.07UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.65LIKELY
Sadness
0.54LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.69LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.2UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.63LIKELY
Extraversion
0.41UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.77LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.55LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction:
Introduction:
Over the last couple of messages, I’ve mentioned how the first chapter of John parallels the first chapter of Genesis and how all of this sets up the comparison between the old creation versus the new creation.
And just as Genesis finishes the seventh day with a story of a wedding so does the Gospel of John.
None of the other gospels actually mention this miracle and it is altogether possible that the Holy Spirit didn’t reveal the full significance of this wedding and the miracle of turning water into wine until John.
And it isn’t hard to see why this event was overlooked.
By itself, as a stand alone event, it is one of the least remarkable miracles of Jesus.
And isn’t because John didn’t have enough material for his new book because he tells us later in chapter 20:
John 20:2
In fact, John was highly selective in the miracles that he chose for his gospelThis begs the question of why did John pick this miracle that was not included in the other gospels.
I’m assuming that out of all those unreported miracles that Jesus performed, there were probably a few that were probably more spectacular or noteworthy.
Reynolds Price, who is an English professor at Duke, in his commentary on the Gospel of John, writes that if you were making up a biography of Jesus, there is absolutely no way that you would begin with what we read here.
As he argues, a miraculous solution to a mere social blunder is not what we would expect as the introduction for the Son of God.
But there is a positive spin, because for some this miracle is proof that John actually tried to give an account for real events that happened in the life of Christ.
Reynolds Price, who is an English professor at Duke, in his commentary on the Gospel of John, writes that if you were making up a biography of Jesus, there is absolutely no way that you would begin with what we read here.
As he states, a miraculous solution to a mere social blunder is not what we would expect as the introduction for the Son of God.
Now, the key to understanding the significance of this miracle is found in the conclusion that John draws out at the end of the passage.
In verse 11, we see that John describes this event as a sign.
Of the four gospels, only John is consistent in describing the miracles that Christ performs as signs.
A good working definition for the word sign is “a perceptible indication of something that is not readily apparent” or “a lesser reality instructing us of a greater reality”.
I want you to remembers that definition because unfortunately, it seems that the most common use of this passage by many Christians is simply as a proof text to justify their freedom to drink.
I can’t tell you how many times I have heard someone justify their excessive drinking with the argument that Jesus turned water into wine.
And what we’ve essentially done is we have reduced this glorious sign that points to something incredibly beautiful and turned it into a very weak excuse to drink far too liberally as believers.
In fact, we have done exactly the opposite of what a sign was meant for, we have taken a greater reality and turned into a lesser one.
This particular miracle signifies that there is a transforming power associated with Jesus.
He changes the water of Judaism into the wine of Christianity, the water of Christlessness into the wine of the richness and the fullness of eternal life in Christ, the water of the law into the wine of the gospel.
This morning, I want us to look at the greater reality that this miracle points to by breaking down this passage into 2 main thoughts:
Religion is the old wine that runs dry.
2. Union with Christ is the new wine that brings eternal love and joy.
To set up this story, we read that Jesus and his disciples are invited to a wedding.
Jewish weddings could last for several days and it was the host’s responsibility to provide food and drink for the entire celebration.
To not do so, was not only a major social blunder but it was possibly grounds for legal action.
So Mary, like many of our mothers, decides she needs to get involved and meddle in the situation.
Turning to Jesus, she tells him that he needs to do something about this.
To which, Jesus gives what seems like a very human response.
“Woman, what does this have to do with me.” (Meaning, this is none of my business and it shouldn’t be yours.)
We are going to come back to Jesus’ response later on but Mary must have known that Jesus would come around because she tells the waiters, “Do whatever he tells you?”
It would seem that Mary has seen Jesus do some things that were maybe out of the ordinary.
At any rate, Jesus tells the waiters to get the stone waterpots, fill them with water, and to give it to the master of the feast.
There is no coincidence that Jesus takes these large containers that were used for ritual purification and commands that they be filled with water that he would turn into wine.
It’s fair to assume that everyone at the wedding was Jewish and therefore, all of the water that was in these pots were used so that each of the guests could be ritually pure in order to come into the wedding.
And this religious purity for the bride and groom and even the purity of the guests was important for the observance of any Jewish ceremony including their weddings.
Today among certain circles, there is this on-going debate whether or not marriage is a civil, social, or religious construct.
The answer it seems is yes to all three but in varying degrees.
In some cultures especially in the past, it was largely a social construct that ensured two families would share all their resources.
In some cultures, it is largely a means to be recognized by the government to gain certain benefits.
But in our so-called modern western culture, marriage is deeply rooted in its religious origins.
Why does the bride where all white?
It is a symbol of her purity.
She is pure as an angel, untainted and unstained by the world.
But who are we kidding, most people who get married are not virgins on their wedding day and they are certainly not this unblemished moral beauty.
(Men don’t even pretend.)
However, it is a symbol of all that we desire spiritually.
When we talk about marriage, why do we talk about an eternal love, a love that will last forever?
Again knowing full well that 50% of marriages end in divorce and 100% marriages end in death.
Love in our marriages does not last forever, it has a definitive end.
But again it is a sign of our deepest desires for a love that well never end.
I can go one and one.
Let me give one more.
Why do we want to find a soulmate, someone who will know you to the bottom and completely fulfill you?
I’ve been married for over 20 years and as far as I can tell, our marriage is pretty good, top one percentile.
My wife fulfills me completely but I don’t know if I do the same for her.
One of Mira’s favorite questions is “Do you understand?” and more often than not, I’m left shaking my head, “I don’t think I really understand but I’ll pretend I do.”
All joking aside, we are very different people and we’ve moved past this soulmate thing because we know there is only One person who knows us and can satisfy completely.
And without our individual relationships with Jesus, all of these unrealistic expectations would come crashing down on our marriages.
And when it does, it often times leaves us feeling empty.
In all religious constructs, the old wine eventually runs dry.
(Ask any couple that has been married 5 years, if they still have that festival joy in their marriage that they had on their wedding day.)
Marriage as a religious institution cannot hold within itself the new wine that God promises.
It’s old wineskin that is good for it’s intended purpose but it cannot hold the love that we were meant to receive solely from Christ.
Marriage as a religious construct points to much greater reality.
The Western ideals of love and marriage are now widespread and generally accepted as universal because there is a universal longing in the human heart to be part of the greatest love story that was ever told.
I think, most people across various cultures like Disney films because some of the themes resonate in all people.
In my opinion, one of the most underrated Disney films is Tangled and my favorite scene from the movie is when Rapunzel and Flynn are in a boat and the lanterns for Rapunzel’s birthday go up and they sing, “I see the light”.
And at last I see the light
And it's like the fog has lifted
And at last I see the light
And it's like the sky is new
And it's warm and real and bright
And the world has somehow shifted
All at once everything looks different
Now that I see you
Ask my wife, I am one of the most romantically challenged people but that scene always gets me right here in my heart.
It’s not like I’m some love starved single guy.
I’m very content in my relationship but it stirs a part of my heart that longs for a love that changes everything and one day will not only make the sky new but everything underneath the sun as well.
And either I can dismiss this as romantic nonsense or accept it as a longing that exists because God in Christ loves me in this way.
What I cannot do and should not do is believe that another person can fulfil this deep longing in me because they can’t.
In modern Christianity, we have lost some essential truths of the Gospel and possibly none more damaging than the fact that union with Christ is the new wine that fulfills our deepest desires for eternal love and joy.
In this miracle, Jesus is ushering in a different way to relate to God, a new way to worship God, not based on ritual and religion but based on our union with Him. it is appropriate that Jesus begins to reveal his glory at a wedding.
As we all know, weddings often have a dual effect on people.
I remember the first wedding I went to after the birth of Carissa, I found myself eating my cake with tears in my eyes.
Seeing the traditional first dance of the bride and her father was too much.
It didn’t help that Mira reminded me that this was going to happen quicker than we will realize, that one day I will have to give her away.
Weddings are strange like that because they are a mixture of joy and sadness.
If you are a parent, you know that this will be your son or daughter.
If you are a single friend of the bride and groom, you are happy for them but often sad for yourself.
In this passage, this is the phenomena that we see being played out in Jesus’ reaction because this wedding points to the sacrifice that Christ will have to make in order to redeem his bride.
When the wine runs out, his mother comes to tell Jesus that there is nothing left to drink and we find that his response is abrupt and seems rather harsh.
He tells her, what does this have to do with us, why are you concerning yourself with, this is not any of our business.
There is no indication in this statement that Jesus is going to help fix this situation but just two verses later, we see the first of his miracles.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9