Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.16UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.57LIKELY
Sadness
0.18UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.55LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.34UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.86LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.92LIKELY
Extraversion
0.16UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.72LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.75LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
What About My Rights?
Last week we ended with the last verse of chapter 8 which Paul says that he would never eat meat again as long as he lives if he felt it would cause another believer to stumble.
Then he changes pace a little in chapter 9 in which he starts defending himself again.
Let’s read it together:
Verse 1
Paul asks three questions
Am I not free?
Am I not an Apostle?
Haven’t I seen Jesus?
Wasn’t it because of my ministry that you are saved?
Verse 2
It doesn’t matter what others think about Paul’s Apostleship because the Corinthian Christians were proof of it.
Verses 3-5
Paul’s answer to those questioning his authority
Apostles have the right to eat and drink.
They have the right to be married as other apostles at that time were.
Verse 6
Is it only Paul and Barnabas that had to work to support themselves?
Verse 7
Paul uses three analogies here to appeal to there humanity.
Soldier
Doesn’t pay to fight, rather he gets paid to fight a war.
Farmer
Gets to share in some of the harvest
Shepherd
Reaps the benefit of the milk
Verses 8-10
Paul appeals to their religious side and brings up the Law of Moses.
The ox would be used to separate the wheat from the chaff by walking on or pulling a grinding stone over the wheat.
The muzzle was meant to keep the ox from eating the grain which was their livelihood.
The muzzle wouldn’t have been beneficial for the owner because it didn’t promote the health of the ox, and the health of the ox was worth much more than the amount of grain it would’ve eaten while treading.
Was the Mosaic law about animal right or Human rights?
He who plows should do so in hope
He who treads should partake in hope also
Human Rights:
Right to life;
Equality;
Equality; x Security of person; x Freedom from slavery; x Freedom from arbitrary arrest/detention; x Freedom of movement and residence; x Due process of law; x Freedom of opinion and expression; x Freedom of association and assembly; x Right to safe and healthy working conditions; x Right to form trade unions and to strike; x Right to adequate food, clothing, and housing; x Right to education; and x Right to health.
Security of person;
Freedom from slavery;
Freedom from arbitrary arrest/detention;
Freedom of movement and residence;
Due process of law;
Freedom of opinion and expression;
Freedom of association and assembly;
Right to safe and healthy working conditions;
Right to form trade unions and to strike;
Right to adequate food, clothing, and housing;
Right to education; and
Right to health.
Verses 11-14
It’s a great thing for apostles to reap material things where they’ve sown spiritual things.
The priest ate of the holy things
Those who preach the gospel should live from the gospel.
Verse 15-18
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9