Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.08UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.1UNLIKELY
Fear
0.1UNLIKELY
Joy
0.65LIKELY
Sadness
0.49UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.83LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.16UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.68LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.42UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.02UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.65LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.33UNLIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Illustration of poor palate; Tim’s summary of my eating is eating to survive.
He doesn’t mean, I eat small portions.
He means that I lack fine taste.
Example of him smiling at my basic sandwich at Subway.
Josslyn has been patient in refining my palate as well.
Many times I will run home and eat cold leftovers.
I tell her that I am fine with eating cold food, but she reminds me that I don’t want to take the time to warm something up.
In a similar way, this passage addresses a sin that we often face.
Perceived fullness and cost keep us from partaking of God’s saving work.
God’s saving work is enjoyed by invitation only
God’s invitation is free and satisfying
Illustration of Honking horn invitation vs invitation to Southland cove
God’s no cost and rich food show that he is eager and able to satisfy
The proposed alternative
Partaking involves listening and committing
The promise is eternal life
We don’t partake because we have higher needs, think we are wise,
God’s invitation requires a response
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9