Why Drive Jesus Out?
Introduction
Major Ideas
Part #1: The Savior Reveals Himself (vv. 16-21).
Part #2: The People’s Doubt and the Savior’s Response (vv. 22-27).
Part #3: The People Drive Him Out and He Walks Away (vv. 28-30).
Conclusion
A synagogue service had various elements (m. Meg. 3–4; m. Ber. 2): recitation of the Shema˓ (Deut. 6:4–9), prayers (including some set prayers like the Tephillah and the Shemoneh Esreh [Eighteen Benedictions]), a reading from the Law, a reading from the Prophets, instruction on the passages, and a benediction.
The Hebrew Scripture would be read in a standing position in one- to three-verse units.
After the reading came an invitation for someone to instruct the audience. Based on texts already read or on new texts, this instruction could be done by any qualified male in the audience, provided ten males were present.
4:17 Jesus takes the scroll and unrolls it to the place from which he will give instruction. It seems that Jesus chose the reading from the Prophets and “found” (εὗρεν, heuren) the place in Isaiah from which he wanted to teach (Luce 1933: 120; Fitzmyer 1981: 531; Schürmann 1969: 228–29). If the text was part of a fixed reading schedule, then the scroll would have been opened at the appropriate place. This detail suggests that a reading schedule was not used, but that Jesus chose his text.
He cites a low point in Israel’s history: the time of Elijah and Elisha. In this historical comparison, the threat is that those closest to Jesus may miss God’s blessing, while others, who are far away, will receive it. Luke 4:25–27, which alludes to the period of the evil king Ahab, is unique to Luke’s portrayal of the synagogue account. The OT text alluded to here is 1 Kings 17–18, which refers to a specific famine and judgment for covenant unfaithfulness. Such unfaithfulness brought Israel under judgment at this time, so God’s provision and prophetic signs were absent from the land.
Like Paul’s message about going to the Gentiles, this warning also left its audience displeased (Acts 13:46, 50; 22:21–22; Plummer 1896: 129). Outsiders might end up being blessed, while insiders are left out.
Luke is summarizing textual material used by Jesus in his synagogue address, since a normal synagogue reading would not mix passages quite like this, and the description of Jesus’ remarks here is decidedly brief and dramatic (see the exegesis of 4:21). Jesus likely used both passages in the actual setting.
The figure of Isa. 61 brings a message of God’s deliverance to exiles. The deliverance imagery parallels the description of the Jubilee year (Lev. 25: 8–17), when debts were canceled and slaves were freed every fiftieth year. It is a picture of forgiveness and spiritual liberation, which is at the center of Jesus’ message
When Jesus applies the passage to himself, he is saying that the present time is like the message of comfort that Isaiah brought to the nation. In fact, the totality of the deliverance that Isaiah described is now put into motion with Jesus’ coming. He is the Servant par excellence.
While a prophet could proclaim the message of liberty for the oppressed, he could not bring it to pass. It is a deliverer who brings deliverance to reality.
Jesus will do what Israel was rebuked in Isaiah 58 for not doing: Jesus will meet in love the needs of those who need God.
Because of the comprehensive character of the deliverance that Isaiah described, Jubilee was interpreted in Judaism as a reference to the dawn of God’s new age.
Jubilee, by analogy, becomes a picture of total forgiveness and salvation, just as it was in its prophetic usage in Isa. 61.
The remaining issue in Luke 4:19 is the omission of a reference to judgment. One of two explanations is possible. First, the omission may have been made to delay the allusion to judgment until Jesus’ warnings in 4:24–27. As mentioned earlier with John the Baptist, the time of salvation is also a time of division (3:7–9, 16–17; 2:34–35). But another reason is more likely: the ultimate time of God’s vengeance is not yet arrived in this coming of Jesus (9:51–56; 17:22–37; 21:5–37). The division of deliverance and judgment in God’s plan, alluded to by the omission, is sorted out later in Luke. This omission represents part of the “already–not yet” tension of NT eschatology, and a Gospel writer can discuss an issue from either side of the temporal perspective. Jesus’ mission is placed initially in terms of hope, but it also brings an implication of judgment about which he will warn in 4:24–27.
Of course, the era of fulfillment is very much tied to Jesus’ person. He brings a special time.
Jesus is saying to his hometown audience, “The time that all people faithful to God have been waiting for is now here and it is found in me.”
Marveling at his words is a positive response to rhetorical skill, not to his claims.
The skepticism argues that Jesus’ claims are excessive for a Galilean Jew.
In all likelihood, Jesus is the object of the “lynch law,” where a person who is seen as flagrantly violating the law is executed on sight and without a trial (John 8:59; 10:31; Acts 7:54–58; 21:31–32; Plummer 1896: 129). If Jesus is viewed by the crowd as a false prophet, he could be subject to such a slaying according to Deut. 13:5 [13:6 MT] (also Jer. 11:21; Danker 1988: 110; Schürmann 1969: 239). Such a situation might presuppose a stoning (Blinzler 1970).
In all likelihood, Jesus is the object of the “lynch law,” where a person who is seen as flagrantly violating the law is executed on sight and without a trial (John 8:59; 10:31; Acts 7:54–58; 21:31–32; Plummer 1896: 129). If Jesus is viewed by the crowd as a false prophet, he could be subject to such a slaying according to Deut. 13:5 [13:6 MT] (also Jer. 11:21; Danker 1988: 110; Schürmann 1969: 239). Such a situation might presuppose a stoning (Blinzler 1970).