The Sabbath Controversy
Legalism robs people of joy, while Jesus has come to bring joy and gladness.
I. Legalism is Restrictive, while Jesus brings Refreshment (vv. 23-26)
The observance of the sabbath was one of the principal distinguishing marks of the Jews as the people of God (sabbath and circumcision were the two most obvious such ‘badges’), and as such was promoted and defended with more than merely pietistic zeal.
At its heart lies the list of thirty-nine prohibited acts in m. Šab. 7:2 (which include ‘reaping’, hence the objection in 2:24), but these in turn are then worked out in terms of specific situations and eventualities.
I. Restrictions vs. Refreshment (vv. 23-26)
Pulling ears of corn was ‘reaping’, and that was one of the thirty-nine activities specifically forbidden on the sabbath (Anderson). Schweizer also points out that even ‘walking’ was a breach of sabbath law, unless the distance was strictly limited.
Pulling ears of corn was ‘reaping’, and that was one of the thirty-nine activities specifically forbidden on the sabbath (Anderson). Schweizer also points out that even ‘walking’ was a breach of sabbath law, unless the distance was strictly limited.
Amplifying Exod 35:1–3, the Mishnah lists thirty-nine classes of work that profane the Sabbath, including those we might expect, such as plowing, hunting, and butchering, and those we would not, such as tying or loosening knots, sewing more than one stitch, or writing more than one letter (m. Shab. 7:2).
In Essentials Unity, In Non-Essentials Liberty, In All Things Charity
II. Legalism is a Burden, while Jesus brings Blessing (vv. 27-28)
III. Legalism is Harmful, while Jesus brings Healing (vv. 1-6)
Jesus’ anger is a description of righteous indignation. The greatest enemy of divine love and justice is not opposition, not even malice, but hardness of heart and indifference to divine grace, to which not even disciples of Jesus are immune.