Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.54LIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.51LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.65LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.3UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.93LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.39UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.08UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.35UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.68LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Radical Christianity
Scripture
“Then a demon-possessed man who was blind and mute was brought to Jesus, and He healed him, so that the mute man spoke and saw” ().
Message
Much of this chapter deals with Jesus confronting the Pharisees about their use of the “truth.”
When they declared that the disciples’ picking of grain on the Sabbath was unlawful, Jesus replied: “But if you had known what this means, ‘I desire compassion, and not a sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent” ().
You see, the Pharisees were using their knowledge of the Law to ascertain others’ measure of righteousness.
In doing so, they fell into condemning the righteous.
Then, when Jesus healed the man with the withered hand, verse 10 tells us they asked questions about it in order “to accuse him.”
When He did heal, verse 14 gives us their response:
“But the Pharisees went out and conspired against Him, as to how they might destroy Him.”
Why?
Because He healed on the Sabbath?
Partly — but the bottom line was they loved their ability to keep the Law more than the hurting.
They reveled in their own righteousness and prided themselves in not messing up.
Now, they never accomplished anything either, but they’d rather be barren and clean, useless and right, than to be fruitful though messy.
· Births are messy.
· Growth is expensive.
· Life requires maintenance.
· Success includes failures.
The Bible says in , “Where no oxen are, the manger is clean, but much increase comes with the strength of an ox.”
But Jesus exemplifies a radical Christianity.
I noticed how He knew that the end of the Law was to love God and it would end us up in loving people.
The end of the Law is not keeping it.
That’s not the end of my reach; it’s the beginning.
Church planting is not the end of our reach; it’s the beginning.
Getting a ministry assignment, a church, a position, isn’t the end of your reach.
It’s the beginning!
I noticed something that disturbed everything about my traditional theology – “There was brought to Him a demon-possessed man, who was blind and mute, and He healed him.”
Now, at first pass, that sounds nice, but why were the religious people so outraged to the point where they said that “Jesus was a cult?” (v.
24).
It would be like praying for healing for a demon-possessed man in our Wednesday service and not even leading him to faith in Christ.
It would be helping people before preaching to them – unlike the old “mission” at the train stations where they’d preach first and feed later.
Jesus just fed!
And the Pharisees got “fed up.”
Jesus wasn’t on a “recruitment” kick.
He loved, He healed, He fed … because His Father loves lost people.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9