Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.06UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.23UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.1UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.24UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.83LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.69LIKELY
Extraversion
0.6LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.93LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.78LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Caesarea Philippi
Caesarea Philippi
Caesarea Philippi
On The Way
Jesus and the disciples leave Bethsaida and head toward Caesarea Philippi a journey of approximately 25 miles.
There seems to be a significants to this private teaching style of Jesus.
The influence of Peter
The early church believed that Mark got many of his facts from Peter, for they knew that Mark himself had not been a disciple of Jesus during his lifetime.
We cannot prove this point, but we do know that both Mark and Peter were together in Rome in later years (1 Pet.
5:13).
We also know that Peter was intending before his death to make a permanent record of his memories of Christ (2 Pet.
1:15).
Most of the early church fathers believed that Mark’s gospel was this record.
Certainly there are many details in the gospel that are best explained as personal memories of Peter, e.g.
descriptions of incidents at which only Peter, James and John were present.
Another possible clue is that the gospel is very uncomplimentary to Peter, pointing out all his faults and failings.
As Peter later became such an important man at Rome, it is hard to see how these could have got into the gospel unless Peter himself had insisted on it.
The influence of Peter
The early church believed that Mark got many of his facts from Peter, for they knew that Mark himself had not been a disciple of Jesus during his lifetime.
We cannot prove this point, but we do know that both Mark and Peter were together in Rome in later years (1 Pet.
5:13).
We also know that Peter was intending before his death to make a permanent record of his memories of Christ (2 Pet.
1:15).
Most of the early church fathers believed that Mark’s gospel was this record.
Certainly there are many details in the gospel that are best explained as personal memories of Peter, e.g.
descriptions of incidents at which only Peter, James and John were present.
Another possible clue is that the gospel is very uncomplimentary to Peter, pointing out all his faults and failings.
As Peter later became such an important man at Rome, it is hard to see how these could have got into the gospel unless Peter himself had insisted on it.
Peter’s influence
The early church believed that Mark got many of his facts from Peter, for they knew that Mark himself had not been a disciple of Jesus during his lifetime.
We cannot prove this point, but we do know that both Mark and Peter were together in Rome in later years ().
We also know that Peter was intending before his death to make a permanent record of his memories of Christ ().
Most of the early church fathers believed that Mark’s gospel was this record.
Certainly there are many details in the gospel that are best explained as personal memories of Peter, e.g.
descriptions of incidents at which only Peter, James and John were present.
Another possible clue is that the gospel is very uncomplimentary to Peter, pointing out all his faults and failings.
As Peter later became such an important man at Rome, it is hard to see how these could have got into the gospel unless Peter himself had insisted on it.
The influence of Peter
The early church believed that Mark got many of his facts from Peter, for they knew that Mark himself had not been a disciple of Jesus during his lifetime.
We cannot prove this point, but we do know that both Mark and Peter were together in Rome in later years (1 Pet.
5:13).
We also know that Peter was intending before his death to make a permanent record of his memories of Christ (2 Pet.
1:15).
Most of the early church fathers believed that Mark’s gospel was this record.
Certainly there are many details in the gospel that are best explained as personal memories of Peter, e.g.
descriptions of incidents at which only Peter, James and John were present.
Another possible clue is that the gospel is very uncomplimentary to Peter, pointing out all his faults and failings.
As Peter later became such an important man at Rome, it is hard to see how these could have got into the gospel unless Peter himself had insisted on it.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9