Matthew 9:14-34
New wine in new wineskins
v14-17
Perhaps Matthew’s point is that the new does not need to be constrained by the old, and that only in this way can that which is of value from the old be preserved.
Once again the image is clearer than the application, but the idea commends itself that what is being asserted is that the new does not need to be constrained by the old, and that only in this way can the new be welcomed and the abiding value of the old be preserved.
v18-26
It is not quite certain what the word I have translated tassel signifies here. It is used for the border or edge of something, and thus could mean the hem of Jesus’ cloak. But among the Jews it was also used of the tassels attached to their outer garment to remind them to follow the commandments of God (Num. 15:37–38; Deut. 22:12; Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for making their tassels long, 23:5). Since this was a normal part of Jewish dress, we should probably understand the word here to mean one of these tassels. The cloak was the outer garment.
37 The LORD said to Moses, 38 “Speak to the people of Israel, and tell them to make tassels on the corners of their garments throughout their generations, and to put a cord of blue on the tassel of each corner. 39 And it shall be a tassel for you to look at and remember all the commandments of the LORD, to do them, not to follow after your own heart and your own eyes, which you are inclined to whore after. 40 So you shall remember and do all my commandments, and be holy to your God. 41 I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt to be your God: I am the LORD your God.”
faith is that state of awareness, receptivity, and readiness for appropriate action which opens one to the working of the powers of the kingdom of God in the ministry of Jesus.
While it is certainly used of salvation from sickness and the like, it is also used with a deeper meaning when connected with faith. It may well be that Matthew is not unmindful of that deeper meaning and that he recalls that Jesus certainly saved people like this woman from physical ailments, but that this was only part of a fuller and more wonderful salvation. It is difficult to think that the blessing received by even a small faith means no more than physical soundness. At any rate, from that moment the sufferer was made well, the specification of that hour making it clear that it was Jesus’ saving power that was responsible and not some spontaneous cure.
The woman is allowed to disappear from sight once the point has been powerfully made that contact with Jesus is transformatory for those who approach him with believing receptiveness.
“Even the poorest in Israel should hire not less than two flutes and one wailing woman” (Ketub. 4:4); for the daughter of a ruler there would be much more than that. Matthew is referring to professional mourners who were on the job very promptly (cf. Jer. 9:17–18). But relatives and friends would join in with their loud wailing (the noisy crowd).
Given the irony, the laughter is in itself innocent enough, but it will be taken to reflect a deeper lack of perception about the newness of the situation which was emerging because of the presence of Jesus and, in reflecting this lack of perception, as a mild form of the hostility to Jesus which is beginning to build
v27-31
The healing of the blind signals dramatically the newness of what God is now doing. Despite all attempts to avoid publicity, there is no containing news of such events. Such things are unmatched in the history of Israel.
The healing of the blind signals dramatically the newness of what God is now doing.
There are no miracles of the giving of sight in the Old Testament, nor in the New after the Gospels (the restoration of sight to Saul of Tarsus, Acts 9:17–18, is not of the same order). But in Jesus’ ministry there are more miracles of the giving of sight than of any other single category. The giving of sight is a divine activity (Exod. 4:11; Ps. 146:8), and it has messianic significance (Isa. 29:18; 35:5; 42:7).
v32-34
But the Pharisees (see on 3:7) had their own explanation. They were sure that they were right and Jesus was wrong, and nothing could be allowed to interfere with that basic conviction. They did not deny that something miraculous had occurred; they had seen this just as “the crowds” had done. If something miraculous had occurred and if Jesus was not on the side of the good, then for them the conclusion was obvious—it was by means of Satan that the dumb man was made to speak.
The Pharisees shut their eyes to the good Jesus does and ascribe it to the working of evil. This calling of good evil is perhaps the greatest blasphemy, the blasphemy that is unforgivable