Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.08UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.48UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.46UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.67LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.36UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.88LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.8LIKELY
Extraversion
0.26UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.5UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.62LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Reward for Godly Servanthood, 19-20
Peter previously dealt with submission to those over us in civil government.
In today’s passage he now deals with the relationship between slave and master.
This is far removed from our experience, and it might be helpful to look at this peculiar institution.
Slavery in Peter’s day
Slavery in the Roman empire was not race-based in that day.
People became slaves in several ways: by being captured in wars, kidnapped, or born of a a slave.
It is estimated that Julius Caesar in his conquests sent back to Italy close to a million slaves from what is now France and parts of Germany.
People facing economic hardships might choose to sell themselves or their children into slavery in order to survive.
Many slaves lived miserably, particularly those who served in the mines.
Other slaves, however, served as doctors, teachers, managers, musicians, artisans, and could even own other slaves.
It would not be unusual for a slave to be better educated than the master.
It is estimated that in Peter’s time, close to 15% of the overall population of the Empire were slaves.
Out in the provinces where Peter’s audience lived it may have been closer to 1 in four people were slaves.
Slaves worked everywhere – in private households, in mines and factories, and on farms.
They also worked for city governments on engineering projects such as roads, aqueducts and buildings.
As a result, they merged easily into the population.
In fact, slaves looked so similar to the general populace in Rome that the Senate once considered a plan to make them wear special clothing so that they could be identified at a glance.
The idea was rejected because the Senate feared that, if slaves saw how many of them were working in Rome itself, they might be tempted to join forces and rebel.
Still, slaves in the Roman world were under the control of their masters and had no independent existence.
One writer of the day said servus non habet personam ('a slave has no persona').
He has no personhood.
He does not own his body; he has no ancestors, no name, no family, no goods of his own.
He or she was as if they were a living thing or a talking tool.
Just property, as if they were a piece of furniture or cattle.
Slaves had no legal rights, and masters could beat them, brand them, and abuse them physically and sexually without penalty.
So, we could definitely say that slaves of that era were in hostile work environments!
Some did advocate for decent treatment for their slaves, but that was the exception rather than the rule.
Slaves could purchase their freedom in the Greco-Roman world with the help of their masters, a procedure called manumission.
In the Roman world they could even become citizens and vote.
The Apostle Paul urged those Christian slaves who could purchase their freedom to do so.
This, though, was available mainly for urban slaves, and most slaves had no hope of being able to purchase their freedom.
Slaves and the Church
What did this mean in practice?
It did not mean that Christians automatically freed all their slaves.
It meant that the concept of a slave as a “living thing” (res mortales) or “talking tool” (instrumentum vocalis) was replaced by one where the slave was a human being, a servant created in the image of God.
They to be treated with dignity.
If they were believers, they were as a member of the extended family, a brother or sister in Christ.
The fact that Peter issued instructions to household servants/slaves would have been startling to the ancient world.
But the Gospel turns things upside down.
Peter, like Paul, gives the servants status, and puts them in the position of being those who could make a choice.
They could live responsibly.
By so living they could thus increase their own self-respect.
They could recognise that they did have control over their own lives, even if they were slaves or menial servants.
They are free in Christ to do as they ought.
Slaves Living for Christ in Difficult Circumstances
But how are slaves to behave as Christians in relation to their masters?How do they live for Christ in their circumstances?
His advice : They are to be obedient to their masters and treat them with due respect because they themselves (the servants) walk in the fear of God.
And this is not only towards those masters who were good and gentle but towards all, even those who are harsh, unfair or difficult to please.
By this means they would be taking charge of their own lives and demonstrating that, although they were ‘God’s freedmen’, they still fulfilled their own duties and responsibilities as servants because they were obedient to Jesus Christ.
This would then also bring Christianity into favour.
And who knew whether by so doing they might win their masters for Christ?
(Compare 1 Peter 3:1).
As we saw last week, we all live in the spheres of the Family, the Church, Our Neighbours, and the State, and have relationships to everyone else as either a superior, inferior, or equal.
The point of teaching we saw is that...
Everyone of us is to fill-up the place and station in life that the Lord has assigned us, and we must glorify Him in it, regardless.
So, slaves, in relation to their masters, are to glorify God by filling -up the place and station in life that the Lord has assigned to them.
They must glorify God in it, regardless of the circumstances.
The manner of their suffering
So, what of the negative circumstances a slave faces?
Peter is careful to distinguish between just and unjust suffering.
The suffering to which slaves, and by extension all Christians, are called is not suffering caused by the human condition, such as illness, aging, and death.
Nor is it suffering that is the consequence of one’s own sin and poor judgment.
Peter’s call is to patient endurance if we suffer unjustly, to suffer patiently even though one has done nothing to provoke or deserve it, simply because one is a Christian.
Peter calls it “commendable.”
The challenge of the call does not stop there; Peter further exhorts the Christian to keep on doing good even when unjust suffering continues to be the result.
“with all respect” “with all fear”
The Greek “in all fear” probably means out of reverence to God whose control extends to every circumstance of life—even to their slavery.
In every instance in 1 Peter fear is directed toward God, not human beings (1 Pet 1:17; 3:2, 6, 14, 16).
In fact, Peter spoke against fearing human beings in 3:6 and 3:14.
The phrase “conscious of God” in 2:19 also constitutes evidence for this view.
Peter writes, “For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly” (2:19).
Mindful of God
Christians persevere in the face of opposition by actively remembering God and actively relying upon him.
The very Spirit who raised Jesus Christ from the dead is near us when we call and supplies us with strength and grace.
And he is pleased with us when we endure injustice: “for this is a gracious thing in the sight of God” (2:20).
We have seen before that our obedience to God is absolute; we obey man only insofar as their commands do not violate God’s Word.
If a master commanded slaves to violate God’s will, then slaves are obligated to disobey, even if they suffer because of their disobedience — unjust suffering.
Believers cannot opt out of obeying masters who are wicked and disreputable.
Peter was scarcely saying that Christian slaves should participate in evil or follow a corrupt master in an evil course of action.
His point was that slaves cannot exempt themselves from doing what a master says, even if the master is wicked.
How this would relate today?
A secretary cannot refuse to type a letter for a manager simply because the manager is an evil person.
Refusal to type the letter would be defensible only if the contents of the letter are evil.
But what to do if you are in such a circumstance?
To encourage us, Peter presents the suffering of our Saviour Jesus to be our model, our example.
Don’t be afraid of the unjust suffering you are experiencing.
It is not evidence that God has forsaken you; to the contrary, it is evidence that God has chosen you.
Suffering because we have chosen to honour God in our circumstances is an affirmation that we’re on the right track!
Are you facing such suffering?
Are you “catching it” because you are being faithful to Christ?
Do you have those times when you are tempted to ditch it all because the going has been tough and you feel you are going to break?
Do not be tempted to wander off from Christ, for God will strengthen you to face life as a Christian.
Peter will tell us to remember Jesus!
God has made you secure because Jesus has suffered the ultimate injustice and yet he lives.
You have been born again into that living hope.
Let’s look at what Peter tells us:
Christ’s Suffering Presents Our Model for Behaviour, 21-25
The word “example” (hypogrammon) is used of children who trace over the letters of the alphabet in order to learn to write the letters correctly.
Christ’s suffering functions as an example for this purpose (hina), so that believers would “follow in his steps.”
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9