A Christ-Centered Life
Intro
When Paul says that Christ Jesus was in the form of God, that is, in full possession of the divine nature, he underlines the fact by using, not the simple verb ‘to be’, but a stronger verb which in its characteristic usage has the force ‘to be really and truly’, ‘to be characteristically’, even ‘to be by nature’. In a passage like the present one, where it is plain that every word has been weighed and measured, the full meaning of the verb can be assumed: he was really and truly, in his own personal and essential nature, God.
But, being so, he emptied himself. The very notion of ‘emptying’ inevitably suggests deprivation or lessening, the loss of something that was possessed before. When Jesus emptied himself, did he diminish himself, and if so, in what way? Here is a thought which must obviously be handled with great care.
It is helpful to note, in the first place, the fact that the verb ‘to empty’ in every other New Testament instance means ‘to deprive something of its proper place and use’. ‘Christ, indeed,’ says Calvin, ‘could not divest himself of Godhead; but he kept it concealed for a time … he laid aside his glory in the view of men, not by lessening it, but by concealing it.’ Or again, ‘Kenosis’, according to D. G. Dawe, ‘says that God is of such a nature that acceptance of the limitations of a human life does not make him unlike himself … he is free to be our God without ceasing to be God the Lord.’ Or, more specifically, if we follow through the interpretation of Collange mentioned above, ‘the kenosis was a voluntary deprivation of the exercise of Lordship’.15
Secondly, we ought to notice that in asking the perfectly natural question, ‘Of what did Christ Jesus empty himself?’, we are, in fact, departing from the direct line of thought in this passage. For the verb emptied is at once followed by an explanatory clause, taking the form of a servant (slave). Our eye, in other words, is removed from the realm of mystery (the relation between the new incarnate life and the eternal divine life) and focused on the realm of historical factuality, the reality of the eternal God becoming truly man. It is not ‘Of what did he empty himself?’ but ‘Into what did he empty himself?’ While it must be pointed out that this way of putting it arises from the flexibility of the English verb ‘to empty’ and does not reflect the Greek use of kenoō in the New Testament, it nevertheless catches perfectly the movement of Paul’s thought: Christ Jesus brought the whole of his divine nature, undiminished, into a new and—had it not been revealed to us in Scripture—unimaginable state.
Yet it may be that ‘Into what did he empty himself?’ is not all that far, if far at all, from Paul’s thought. The parallel between he emptied himself and Isaiah’s word concerning the Servant of the Lord, that ‘he poured out his soul to death’, is too plain to be resisted. The fundamental thought is that of a deliberate, conscious consigning of oneself to a foreseen situation: the Servant of the Lord brought himself voluntarily and totally into death; Jesus, in order to die, first brought his total being down to the condition of the Lord’s Servant.17
Concerning the state to which the Lord Jesus consigned himself, Paul makes three points. First, the intention of the great change was obedient service; he took the form of a slave. Secondly, the sphere in which the service would be discharged was that of a true humanity; he was born in the likeness of men. Thirdly, his true humanity ‘left room’ for that other reality which he brought with him. It was a true humanity: Paul uses again the word form, already discussed; but this time of the slave-state. The Son became the reality of a bondservant. None of this reality is taken away by the careful phrase in the likeness of men: ‘this leaves room for the other side of his nature, the divine, in the likeness of which he did not appear. His likeness to men was real, but it did not express his whole self.’
Throughout all this there is the same revelation of the ‘mind of Christ’. His are the eternal glories, both by nature and by right, but they are not a platform for self-display, nor a launching-pad for self-advancement; they are all for self-denial. Self is something to ‘pour out’.
2. The incarnate God becomes a curse
The story continues in the same vein. By the end of verse 7 a true incarnation has taken place, and at this point Paul picks up the narrative. Christ Jesus was found in human form (verse 8), that is to say, those meeting him felt themselves to be in the presence of a man. They could say, ‘Is not this the carpenter?’20 How exactly true their observation was, but, equally, how much they missed! Well might Isaiah say, ‘To whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?’ (53:1)—or, as we might paraphrase, ‘Who would have believed, were it not revealed by God, that this is the Lord himself come down to save?’ Notice how Paul says (verses 5–6) that it was Jesus who existed before the incarnation and possessed the very nature of God—but Jesus is the name of ‘the carpenter’! The pre-existing and the incarnate Son of God were one and the same person:
Lo, within a manger lies
He who built the starry skies.
He seems the same as other men but in fact is vastly different. The question therefore is, what will he do with this ‘difference’? Will he use it as an occasion for self? Will it, in turn, become ‘a thing to be grasped’? Maybe this is the reason why the Lord spoke to Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration of ‘his departure, which he was to accomplish at Jerusalem’.23 For, having received the plaudits of these two great prophets and the accolade from the Father himself, he could surely have chosen to step back into the personal glory of heaven.
What he did was, however, very different. He chose rather to take upon himself that one thing which, without his consent, had no power against him, death. He was distinct from all others because of his divine nature. In particular, he possessed immortality, proper to God alone.25 But he subjected his immortality to death and thus humbled himself; nothing has now been held back; all has been given up:
Even his garments they parted
When he hung on the cross of shame.
Paul tells us that this was done as an act of obedience to God. The English obedient unto death suggests ‘obeying death’, but the Greek cannot bear this meaning. It requires rather ‘obedient as far as or right up to the point of death’.
Death was the mode, not the master, in his obedience; the obedience was yielded to his Father: this was ‘the cup which the Father has given me’.
Furthermore, the obedience which he rendered to God also achieved a purpose for man: it was death on a cross. Just as it was necessary to appeal to other scriptural evidence to establish that the obedience was a service offered to the Father, so here also Paul is using the succinct, allusive forms of poetry, not writing an itemized doctrinal thesis. When we ask why he proceeds from the fact of death (obedient unto death) to the mode of death (death on a cross), we must look elsewhere to discover what he intended. But the explanation is not hard to find. From one angle, the reference to the cross enhances the thought of his obedience, for ‘cursed be everyone who hangs on a tree’. Our Lord’s cry of dereliction28 shows how truly he entered into the place of rejection and with what horror he was enfolded in so doing: he who was in the form of God came down to earth, down to the cross, down to the curse—and he did it for us, for me! ‘Christ redeemed us from the curse … having become a curse for us.’
Though he was rich, so rich,
Yet for our sakes how poor he became!
Even his garments they parted
When he hung on the cross of shame.
All that he had he gave for me,
That I might be rich through eternity.
Finally, this Godward-manward act was undertaken by the will and consent of the Lord Jesus himself. No-one else did it: he humbled himself. This feature, so central to Philippians 2:6–8, must find its root in Isaiah 53, especially verses 7–9, where for the first time in the Old Testament we meet with a consenting sacrifice. All through the long years of animal sacrifice the Lord had driven home the lesson that in the divine purposes there could be a transference of sin and guilt from the head of the guilty to the head of the innocent. Whenever a sinner brought his animal to the altar and laid his hand on the beast’s head31 the lesson was plain: this stands in my place; this bears my sin. Yet the substitution was incomplete, for the central citadel of sin, the will, was left unrepresented in the uncomprehending, unconsenting animal. Isaiah foresaw that only a perfect Man could be the perfect substitute and that at the heart of this perfection lay a will delighting to do the will of God.
This was the ‘mind of Christ’. He looked at himself, at his Father and at us, and for obedience’ sake and for sinners’ sake he held nothing back.
Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6 who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9 Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, 10 so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6 who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9 Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, 10 so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Who is Jesus?
Jesus in the form of God
Preexistence of Jesus
Jesus’ Divine Nature
Importance of Jesus being God
Did not grasp at this equality
But he emptied himself.
He humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of Death
Application
Prayer
5 Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6 who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9 Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, 10 so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.