Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.11UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.22UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.62LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.88LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.77LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.99LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.23UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.14UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.17UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.25UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
From *The Words of Jesus* by Phyllis Tickle, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2008, page 35-38.
\\ \\ Christian Scripture, like the Scripture of Judaism out of which it comes, consistently refers to the "human heart" as a place of knowing and dwelling.
Implicit in thosse teachings is the idea that brain and heart both are organs of perceiving and being, yet they remain patently distinct from one another.
\\ \\ ...The notion that the self can receive consciousness from anything other than the brain is as fey as it is untenable.
Or it is unless there is indeed a consciousness that is more than mind and in whose image we ourselves are constructed.
\\ \\ Being forced to acknowledge in a a working, practical way, that somewhere in me there is a second site or organ or means of knowing that led to my realizing that which it knows and reports is the traffic going in and out of it.
Now I realize, of course, that one has only to listen in order to perceive this principle as central to Jesus' teaching.
See Luke 6:45; Matthew 5:8; Luke 8:10; and Matthew 13:15.
\\ \\ The heart, it would seem, has its own consciousness and knowledge and ways that can be experienced just as the brain's consciousness and knowledge and ways are experienced.
\\ \\ Accepting, even cautiously, the possibility of a receptive and cognitively functional heart probably raises a myriad of questions.
Only one of them seems accessible here.
Accepting the heart as a way of knowing requires a reexamination of what sacred writ is.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9