Genesis 1:24-25 Creeping Things and Beasts Day 6

Sermon  •  Submitted
0 ratings
· 8 views
Notes
Transcript
Sermon Tone Analysis
A
D
F
J
S
Emotion
A
C
T
Language
O
C
E
A
E
Social
View more →

24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. 28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. 31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

Verses 24–25

We have here the first part of the sixth day’s work. The sea was, the day before, replenished with its fish, and the air with its fowl; and this day were made the beasts of the earth, the cattle, and the creeping things that pertain to the earth.

Here, as before, 1. The Lord gave the word; he said, Let the earth bring forth, not as if the earth had any such prolific virtue as to produce these animals, or as if God resigned his creating power to it; but,

He also did the work; he made them all after their kind, not only of divers shapes, but of divers natures, manners, food, and fashions—some to be tame about the house, others to be wild in the fields—some living upon grass and herbs, others upon flesh—some harmless, and others ravenous—some bold, and others timorous—some for man’s service, and not his sustenance, as the horse—others for his sustenance, and not his service, as the sheep—others for both, as the ox—and some for neither, as the wild beasts

In all this appears the manifold wisdom of the Creator.

The New American Commentary: Genesis 1–11:26 (6) Sixth Day of Creation (1:24–31)

1:24–25 The dry ground and vegetation were created on the third day (v. 9), and this sixth day corresponds to it by the creation of animal and man to populate the land and feed on its herbage (vv. 11, 30)

The New American Commentary: Genesis 1–11:26 (6) Sixth Day of Creation (1:24–31)

As with the creation of vegetation, the land mediates the command of God to produce land creatures (“Let the land produce living creatures”).

The New American Commentary: Genesis 1–11:26 (6) Sixth Day of Creation (1:24–31)

Like the sea creatures in v. 20, these are identified as “living creatures” (nepeš ḥayyâ). The animals are not explicitly said to be blessed, but we may assume that they too receive God’s blessing

The New American Commentary: Genesis 1–11:26 (6) Sixth Day of Creation (1:24–31)

As with the fish and fowl (vv. 20–22), God set reproductive parameters (“according to their kinds”) for these creatures.

Evangelical Commentary on the Bible A. The Creation of the World (1:1–2:3)

Day 3 brought about the environment (land and vegetation); day 6 brings about those beings (animals/humankind) who inhabit that environment (1:24–31)

Evangelical Commentary on the Bible A. The Creation of the World (1:1–2:3)

Unlike the other days the sixth day is alone designated by the article: “the sixth day.” And when it is completed God evaluates only this day’s work as very good.

Evangelical Commentary on the Bible A. The Creation of the World (1:1–2:3)

These two facts indicate the climactic nature of the sixth day.

A farther advance was made by the creation of terrestrial animals, all the various species of which are included in three classes

(1) cattle, the herbivorous kind capable of labor or domestication.

24. beasts of the earth—(2) wild animals, whose ravenous natures were then kept in check, and (3) all the various forms of

creeping things—from the huge reptiles to the insignificant caterpillars

Commentary on the Old Testament The Creation of the World

“After its kind:” this refers to all three classes of living creatures, each of which had its peculiar species

Commentary on the Old Testament The Creation of the World

consequently in v. 25, where the word of God is fulfilled, it is repeated with every class

25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

Commentary on the Old Testament The Creation of the World

This act of creation, too, like all that precede it, is shown by the divine word “good” to be in accordance with the will of God.

the microscopic world of creatures are not mentioned, but the categories are broad enough to include them.

Holman Concise Bible Commentary God’s Creation Goal (1:1–2:25)

Though the creation stories are fundamentally theological and not scientific, nothing in them is contradicted by modern scientific understanding.

Holman Concise Bible Commentary God’s Creation Goal (1:1–2:25)

Genesis insists that all the forms of life were created “after their kind” (1:11–12, 21, 24–25); that is, they did not evolve across species lines

The conclusion was: and God saw that it was good. Higher animals and man were both created on the same day. This accounts for the fact that man, in his physical makeup, is very similar to the physical makeup of the higher animals as far as the basic internal organs are concerned.

The differences lie in the spiritual nature of God-likeness and man’s conscious ability to know God not given to the higher animals.

Holman Concise Bible Commentary God’s Creation Goal (1:1–2:25)

Though the creation stories are fundamentally theological and not scientific, nothing in them is contradicted by modern scientific understanding.

Tyndale Concise Bible Commentary 1:2–25 Seven Days of Creation

THE DAY-AGE THEORY

Many argue that the six creative days of Genesis 1 involved millions of years, not literal twenty-four-hour days. This view is essential to the evolutionary hypothesis that requires long time periods for mutation and natural selection. However, the terms “evening” and “morning” suggest days of a normal length. Throughout the Old Testament the word “day” is never used figuratively when accompanied by a number. But whether they are interpreted as literal or figurative days, God fashioned the literary portrayal of his creation of the universe around six literal days. If something other than literal days is in view, then the text uses the term “day” as a figure of speech. Although normal word usage upholds the argument for literal days, the creation narrative’s literary form of elevated and poetic prose and the desire to correlate the days of creation with the long geological ages posited by science leave room for a figurative use of the word “day.”

don’t know unknown ambiguity stop

Paradox of the plankton

The paradox of the plankton results from the clash between the observed diversity of plankton and the competitive exclusion principle,[1] also known as Gause's law,[2] which states that, when two species compete for the same resource, ultimately only one will persist and the other will be driven to extinction. Phytoplankton life is diverse at all phylogenetic levels despite the limited range of resources (e.g. light, nitrate, phosphate, silicic acid, iron) for which they compete amongst themselves.

Cambrian explosion

The seemingly rapid appearance of fossils in the "Primordial Strata" was noted by William Buckland in the 1840s,[14] and in his 1859 book On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwindiscussed the then inexplicable lack of earlier fossils as one of the main difficulties for his theory of descent with slow modification through natural selection.[15] The long-running puzzlement about the appearance of the Cambrian fauna, seemingly abruptly, without precursor, centers on three key points: whether there really was a mass diversification of complex organisms over a relatively short period of time during the early Cambrian; what might have caused such rapid change; and what it would imply about the origin of animal life. Interpretation is difficult due to a limited supply of evidence, based mainly on an incomplete fossil record and chemical signatures remaining in Cambrian rocks.

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity

Species richness, or biodiversity, increases from the poles to the tropics for a wide variety of terrestrial and marine organisms, often referred to as the latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG)[1]. The LDG is one of the most widely recognized patterns in ecology[1]. The LDG has been observed to varying degrees in Earth's past.[2] A parallel trend has been found with elevation (elevational diversity gradient)[3], though this is less well-studied[4]
Explaining the latitudinal diversity gradient has been called one of the great contemporary challenges of biogeography and macroecology (Willig et al. 2003, Pimm and Brown 2004, Cardillo et al. 2005).[5] The question "What determines patterns of species diversity?" was among the 25 key research themes for the future identified in 125th Anniversary issue of Science (July 2005). There is a lack of consensus among ecologists about the mechanisms underlying the pattern, and many hypotheses have been proposed and debated. A recent review [6] noted that among the many conundrums associated with the LDG (or LBG, Latitudinal Biodiversity Gradient) the causal relationship between rates of molecular evolution and speciation has yet to be demonstrated.

Darwin's abominable mystery of Botany/plants. What is the exact evolutionary history of flowers and what is the cause of the apparently sudden appearance of nearly modern flowers in the fossil record?

Absence of Loricifera fossils. There are at least 100 species of this phylum of marine dwelling animals (many undescribed), but none of them is known to be present in the fossil record.

The Bible Guide What a Difference a ‘Day’ Makes!

It’s good to have the Bible’s unique perspective on the universe—that it is God-made and God-given. Genesis deals with the mighty process in a single chapter—and gets on to the main business of God’s purpose for humankind.

John MacArthur Sermon Archive Creation Day 6, Part 1

Satan is the archenemy of God. Satan is an incurable liar and a deceiver and the Bible says he’s the father of lies. Satan hates the truth of God. And he dominates the world that he rules with falsehood. In fact, Romans 1 says that civilization in general has exchanged the truth of God for the lie. In other words, the world lives under pervasive deception and falsehood. And Satan’s lies literally pervade all human thought, governing all intellectual work, all science, all philosophy, all sociology, all psychology and everything else.

John MacArthur Sermon Archive Creation Day 6, Part 1

Two great ideologies rule. No creator and no moral law. And that dispossesses man of any accountability.

John MacArthur Sermon Archive Creation Day 6, Part 1

there are two lies in particular that provide the basic paradigm for modern culture, two lies. Lie number one is that life is random.

John MacArthur Sermon Archive Creation Day 6, Part 1

second lie, truth is relative

what’s missing at this point? your help! are you letting God set the stage or you
patreon paypal t shirts
social media
pray for meeting
Related Media
See more
Related Sermons
See more