Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.17UNLIKELY
Fear
0.13UNLIKELY
Joy
0.15UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.63LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.73LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.14UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.99LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.38UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.52LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.4UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.56LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
1 Corinthians 15:1-
No other story has ever reached across so many national, ethnic, religious, linguistic, cultural, political, and geographical borders.
how did such a small band of dis-empowered Jews accomplish such an unequaled act?
Radiometric analysis of material from centuries before Christ was born contained Prophesies of His Birth, Death and Resurrection.
These prophecies include specific details that Jesus and His followers could not control
For example, before the Romans invented crucifixion, described the piercing of Jesus’ hands and feet.
For example, before the Romans invented crucifixion, described the piercing of Jesus’ hands and feet.
Jesus was a real person in history who died.
Several manuscripts from multiple sources, including Jewish historians, describe a man named Jesus who lived and was executed.[4]
Specific details reported about His execution confirm.“Blood
and water” spilled from a spear wound in His side.
He really died and was not merely unconscious.
Jesus was a real person in history who died.
Several manuscripts from multiple sources, including Jewish historians, describe a man named Jesus who lived and was executed.[4]
Specific details reported about His execution confirm.“Blood
and water” spilled from a spear wound in His side.
He really died and was not merely unconscious.
The Reliability of scripture.
As of 2014, more than 66,000 early manuscripts are known, orders of magnitude more than other ancient texts.
Many are carbon dated to before Jesus’ time on earth and the first few centuries after.
We see accounts nearly unaltered in the earliest manuscripts.[6]
A pattern of consistency emerges.
There are variations in the manuscripts, but nothing invalidates the reliability of the Resurrection accounts.
The Ugly Truth.
Accounts of the Resurrection include inconvenient and unflattering details, that make most sense as attempts to reliably record what had happened, free from embellishment.
They do not fit expectations of a fabricated account.
For example, women are the first witnesses of the Resurrection.
In a culture that did not admit the testimony of a woman as valid evidence in court, this detail is surprising.
Likewise, all the disciples, the leaders of the early Church, flee as cowards when Jesus is taken.
If the resurrection was a fabricated story why share such embarrassing information?
Jesus wasn’t replaced by a family member which was customary at the time of His death.
Then, something happened that grew a strong, bold, and confident belief that resisted sustained, murderous opposition.
Unlike other movements with executed leaders, once they came back together they did not replace Jesus with one of his family members.
Their resistance was entirely non-violent and devoid of political power.
Yet they were all suddenly willing to die for what they saw.
Archeological Evidence, For centuries now people have been refuting scripture as reliable because of the mention of people, places or things that could not be found in any other historical documents.
However Archaeology has been connecting the dots for the last 3 decades now and blowing their skepticism out of the water .
1 Corinthians 15:12-34
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9