Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.14UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.74LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.38UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.92LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.87LIKELY
Extraversion
0.19UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.78LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.66LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Ray Stedman
2 John: The Vital Balance
The second letter of John is the only letter in the New Testament that was written to a woman.
As we can gather from the letter itself, it was written to a mother with several children, perhaps a widow.
It appears that she had written to the Apostle John to ask his opinion about certain problems that had come up.
Back in those days, of course, the New Testament was not available as it is to us.
The leaders of the churches were dependent upon certain men, called prophets, who went from place to place, preaching the truth.
Evidently some of these men had come to the home of this woman, probably in the city of Ephesus, and they had raised certain doctrinal matters which disturbed her.
Not knowing quite what to do, she wrote to the Apostle John and asked for his counsel.
This letter is his response to her question.
As we go through this, we will see how it also answers many of the questions we have today---especially the question of how to treat people who teach wrong things.
The first six verses present the problem to us and give us John's approach in answering it:
{{{"
The elder [as John terms himself] to the elect lady and her children, whom I love in the truth, and not only I but also all who know the truth, because of the truth which abides in us and will be with us for ever: Grace, mercy, and peace will be with us, from God the Father and from Jesus Christ the Father's Son, in truth and love.
I rejoiced greatly to find some of your children following the truth, just as we have been commanded by the Father.
And now I beg you, lady, not as though I were writing you a new commandment, but the one we have had from the beginning, that we love one another.
And this is love, the we follow his commandment; this is the commandment, as you have heard from the beginning, that you follow love.
(2 Jn. 1-6)}}}
Here John is setting the stage for the answer to this lady's problem.
He is gathering together two things that must be taken into consideration in facing a problem of this kind.
Two outstanding words are used all through the text.
What are they?
Truth is the first, isn't it?
And love.
Truth and love.
Notice how he links these two in verse three:
{{{"
Grace, mercy, and peace will be with us, from God the Father and from Jesus Christ the Father's Son, in truth and love.}}}
This ought to be the characteristic of Christians.
In Paul's letter to the Ephesians he says the same thing---that a Christian should learn to speak the truth in love.
(Eph.
4:15) The remarkable work of a Christian life is to gather these often opposing things together and keep them in balance.
Now that is our problem as well.
Many of us emphasize one, at the expense of the other.
We may emphasize truth and center upon doctrinal matters, insisting that the Scriptures be followed carefully, but at the expense of love.
When we do this, we are rigid and cold and judgmental---sometimes even cruel in the way we say things.
Even though what we say is exactly right, we are trying to defend the truth of God at the expense of love.
On the other hand, there are those of us who make the mistake of emphasizing love at the expense of truth.
They feel that we should accept everyone and everything, being tolerant in all directions.
This second group reminds me of the story Dr. H. A. Ironside used to tell about the man who came to church, and on the way out, as he shook hands with the pastor one Sunday morning, he said to him, "Oh Pastor, I want to tell you what a blessing you've been to me since you've been pastor of this church.
Why, when I first started here, I didn't have any regard for God, man or the devil.
But since you came, I've learned to love all three."
Now the problem is to keep truth and love in balance.
This is what you see so beautifully in the Lord Jesus; he walked in truth and love.
He could deal in tenderness with the dissolute sinner, the outcast from society who came to him.
And with a blistering word, he could scorch a Pharisee until he turned red with shame, as all the rottenness in that man's inner life was revealed.
He spoke the truth and he dealt in love and he kept them in perfect balance.
John says, "When you go to handle a problem of doctrinal error, emphasize both truth and love."
A lot of people who read this letter miss these opening words; thus they miss the sanity of balance that pervades the letter.
In the next section, we have the answer to the lady's question:
{{{"
For many deceivers have gone out into the world, men who will not acknowledge the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh; such a one is the deceiver and antichrist.
Look to yourselves, that you may not lose what you have worked for, but may win a full reward.
Any one who goes ahead and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God; he who abides in the doctrine has both the Father and the Son.
If any one comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into the house or give him any greeting; for he who greets him shares his wicked work.
(2 Jn .
7-11)}}}
First, you have to recognize the nature of the error.
Two things are said here that describe the fundamental types of Christian perversions.
There are only two; all Christian error and heresies gather about one or the other of these.
There are, first of all, those who are deceived about the person of the Lord Jesus.
There is one sign of the true redeemer and saviour---he is the one who came from God into the world and became man.
The incarnation is an essential doctrine of Christian faith.
If you can trace a man's origin from his birth, and you know that he entered this human stream though the normal reproductive faculties, and he claims to be a saviour, you can write it off, because he is not God's saviour.
And if he claims not to believe nor to accept this incarnation of the Lord Jesus, then the man is in error.
No matter what else he may say, he is not speaking as the spokesman of God.
All through the New Testament letters, the mighty apostles of our Lord set this incarnation at the center of Christian theology---the Word becoming man.
Everything else gathers around that, the person of the Lord Jesus.
John says, if a man does not say that, no matter what else he may say, he is a deceiver.
Now he may be deceived as well as being a deceiver, but he is an antichrist.
He is against the doctrine of Jesus.
Therefore, he is to be recognized for what he is---a man who is mistaken and trying to deceive others.
There is another type of error, however, that gathers around a misunderstanding or false conception of the teaching of the Lord Jesus:
{{{"
Any one who goes ahead [literally, goes beyond] and does not abide in the doctrine [the teaching] of Christ does not have God.
(vs.
9)}}}
That is very revealing.
That takes care of all groups that hold that the Bible is not an adequate revelation of God, and that say we need something else.
Someone with such a view may be very persuasive and sincere.
He may be a very great personality.
but this is the test: if he does not abide in the doctrine of Christ, then he is not of God.
There are many people today who say that the teachings of the Scriptures are infantile.
Modern man has grown beyond all this and can no longer accept these simplistic teachings of the Bible.
The modern mind must find satisfaction in more scientific approaches.
It cannot rest upon these simple things.
Do you see that that is another example of exactly what John is talking about here?
Someone who goes beyond, departs from the revelation of Jesus, considering it too simple, and tries to add something to the teachings of the Word of God.
Those are the two types of error; now notice what the danger is.
What will happen to you if you fall in with this kind of thing?
{{{"
Look to yourselves, that you may not lose what you have worked for, but may win a full reward.
(vs.
8)}}}
What do you lose, as a Christian, if you get involved with cults and heresies and liberal approaches that are so widespread?
Will you lose your salvation?
Not if you are really born again, of course.
That rests upon the work of Christ for you.
You are not going to lose your place in heaven, nor your redemption, nor your part in the body of Christ.
But you do lose a great deal, as John makes clear.
You lose the value of your life spent here; you waste your time.
You throw away precious moments and years involved in that which is utterly worthless, and which will be displayed at last as wood, hay and stubble, to be consumed in the fire of God's searching gaze.
You will lose your reward.
All through the New Testament, this possibility is brought before us.
In the book of Revelation, the Apostle John says something similar: "Hold fast what you have, so that no one may seize your crown."
(Rev.
3:11) These crowns are symbols of authority and honor which are given to those who have made themselves available to the work of God. to those who have given their bodies as a living sacrifice for God to work through.
If you get involved in something that is grounded upon false teaching, all your efforts are wasted.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9