Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.14UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.6LIKELY
Sadness
0.58LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.8LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.16UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.91LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.81LIKELY
Extraversion
0.09UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.86LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.63LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Reconciliation and God’s Righteousness
As we gather around this, the Lord’s Table, with these symbols before us, most of us well remember both the words of Jesus and as they were repeated by Paul,
1 Cor 11:
Today and for the next few months as we gather to remember our Saviour’s broken body and shed blood, I would suggest that we allow the Word to clarify the focus our hearts and minds as to the fuller, wider panorama of what we do well to remember with regard to and how ad when these grace gifts are received/accepted by faith, we are born again - moving from the evil kingdom of darkness to God’s kingdom of light.
The Word of God refers to a number of grace gifts that are ours only by grace through faith, only because Jesus, the Christ, the Son of God died in our place.
Redemption - God the Father and God the Son - paying the debt of our sin.
Reconciliation
Righteousness
Atonement
Justification
As we do this, as we remind ourselves what to remember, we do so for good reason.
Almost every generation or two, there are those who with all sincerity begin again teaching/reteaching concepts implying that many evangelicals incorrectly understand and therefore incorrectly remember the spiritual significance of the death of Jesus and the cross.
They seem to suggest that we and the Reformers - John Knox, John Calvin, Huldrych Zwingli, Martin Luther ----
- misunderstand:
The Apostle Paul and what the Reformers referred to justification by faith.
- the Apostle Paul and what the Refotmer
These voices express old suggestions:
If we deserve punishment for our sins, how can God freely forgive?
Sin - more of a symptom of a broken unjust world rather than the blight of all who have sinned and at death face spiritual death - hell - separation from God for all of eternity.
All of this because they fall short of God’s glory and righteousness.
Christ’s death - not as a penalty for sin for all who believe but rather in His death and resurrection, Christ was victorious over death rather sin and death and hell.
BUT I would remind you that Jesus bore our sins and the punishment of our death in our place.
Isaiah the Prophet saw and declared that very clearly.
Is
Isaiah spoke of spiritual healing from the punishment due from our sin.
Again and again, Isaiah spoke of our sin - transgressions, iniquities, gone astray, turned everyone to his own way.
That being the case, Isaiah’s reference to healing must refer to the terminal consequences of our sin.
I could go on but to mention more rabbit trails would take our eyes off remembering Jesus.
I could name those who have again championed and recommended these deceptive slippery rabbit trails.
If I do that some might feel that I lack grace.
If you ask privately I will mention some names - Brian McLaren, Steve Chalke, Alan Mann, N T Wright.
What I would suggest that you consider any of these truths, weigh what you read by googling the topic and then TGC.
As to those who best express what we do well to remember, when we remember Christ’s death on the cross, I would commend to you J I Packer who succinctly wrote,
“The notion which the phrase ‘penal substitution’ expresses is that Jesus Christ our Lord, moved by a love that determined to do everything possible to save us, endured and exhausted the destructive divine judgment for which we were otherwise inescapably destined, and so won us forgiveness, adoption and glory.
To affirm ‘penal substitution’ is to say that believers are in debt to Christ specifically for this, and that this is the mainspring of our joy, peace and praise both now and for eternity.
(Packer - “What did the cross achieve?” - 1974 - pg 25)
For today, we will focus on one verse and one well known Scriptural account both of which help us correctly understand and remember Jesus’ penal substitutionary death in our place.
Today’s verse:
Love
God’s love - merciful rather than judgmental, vindictive - even though are sinners
Christ’s love, willing
The cross is not a form of cosmic child abuse - as some again suggest - perpetrated by a vengeful violent father who punished His son for something the son had not done, rather than the Father loving his enemies as Jesus taught.
Gave
Not forced Jesus
Jesus gave Himself
Not perish but have eternal life
Today’s Bible reference that reminds of God’s love, righteousness, mercy, love and grace.
The scene was the Garden of Eden after the fall.
Gen 3:
Gen
Spiritual death.
Enmity - separation from God - potentially for ever BUT
Offspring of women would bruise head of Satan = death
Heal of that one bruise - not fatal
God provided a covering for them and clothed them.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9