Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.08UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.06UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.57LIKELY
Sadness
0.14UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.62LIKELY
Confident
0.48UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.84LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.48UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.51LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.24UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.52LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
When the smallest cell in the body is under attack,
it brings the demise of the whole.
For as long as I can remember, there has always been a tension between the local church pastor and the staff of parachurch organisations.
Parachurch organisasions work outside and across denominations to engage in social welfare and evangelism.
My battle has been that I sit in both chairs.
I am leading a parachurch national initiative beneficial to the greater body of Christ, and I am also the pastor of a local church.
I have been part of various efforts over the last 27 years of ministry, who with great difficulty and variable success lobbied to get all local churches to work together.
I thus understand the frustration of trying to work with pastors.
But why do we need to work together in a location?
The truth is; one local assembly can’t foster all the support and mobilise all the different types of ministries available to the Body of Christ in one locality.
We need each other.
None of us have it all together but together we have it all.
Michael Wood
The body of Christ is made up of individual cells (), the local assemblies (), and the universal Church ().
When any part of this 3fold molecular structure is sick, or in isolation, the body is weakened.
It is also clear that like our physical bodies, we have to discern the complexity of the diversity of the various functions and parts of the body of Christ.
We cannot reduce the body to only one part or function.
All of it is important and necessary!
There is thus no inside and another outside part!
Whether we’re part of a local general geographic assembly or part of a group of people who meet to focus on one specific human need, we are all meeting together under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.
Remove the religious dualism between vocations as worship for His glory in the secular market place, and vocations seen as a ministry to another within the Church and your vision is suddenly expanded to a glorious network of diverse functions, that can only be God’s genius!
All the individuals, meetings at all locations, for various ministry purposes are all called to be His holy Priesthood, a holy Nation, His bride to be.
That is the picture on the puzzle-box, perspective!
It is wonderful!
Each piece of the body of Christ has an exact shape and creational purpose, like puzzle pieces.
Toss all the pieces on a table, and it looks terrible!
The state of the local Church as single pieces?
Endangered!
Paralysed!
Under resourced!
Poorly trained!
Fragmented!
We all tend to make unclarified accusations against the pieces laying around as the sleeping, unresponsive Church.
We have all been guilty of pointing a finger to a wrong out there, ignoring the wrong that persists in our own heart.
Evidently, He is building His congregation, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.
() and at the end, there will be one final assembly, when all the dead will be judged at the white throne judgement.
()
The question Afrika Mhlophe asked during the recent Africa Leader Forum needs more in-depth attention and dialogue; “WHAT KIND OF CHRISTIANITY ARE WE CREATING?”
We all recognise and acknowledge that the state of the nation in respect to corruption, nepotism, racism, and the enormous economic disparity experienced in SA, is because these strongholds still persist within most churches.
We see the evidence of Christian Nations like São Tomé and Príncipe; DRC; Angola; Rwanda; Seychelles; Equatorial Guinea; Lesotho; Namibia; and Swaziland with more than 90% of their citizens being professing Christians are among the poorest Countries in the World.[1]
There is hence a united outcry: REFORM THE CHURCH TO REFORM THE LAND!
There is an even greater dangerous innate disease threatening the Church.
More and more people are leaving local institutional churches and pick and choose their spiritual diet on social media.
Evangelism, and belonging to a local body of believers is on the increasing decline!
According to the Pew Research Center, the ranks of the Nones have ballooned in recent years, making “no religious affiliation” the fastest-growing category among religious affiliations.
Between 1972 and 1989, about 7% of Americans identified as having no formal religious affiliation, However, between 1990 and 2012, that figure jumped to 15%.
Among people under age thirty.
Just over 30% say they have no religious affiliation.
At the same time, the percentage of the U.S. population that are Christian has experienced a steady decline, and other faiths have had modest growth at best.[2]
A recent study that was conducted by Barna Group reviewed the society’s perception in matters regarding faith and Christianity.
Examining a new book called Good Faith; the findings indicated that Christianity is increasingly viewed as extremist.
[3] The 2017 Pew research is more specific and reveals that most adults surveyed still do consider themselves Christians, even if they seldom go to Church.
These non-attendees beliefs on matters of sex, gender, nationalism, are widely more liberal than how it is portrayed and officiated by the formal Church.[4]
It is thus abundantly clear that the Church is no longer unified on issues of doctrine, worldview, or best practise living standards.
The state of the Church today, thus stands in stark contrast to the early ekklesia, and body of Christ movement!
The early Church was attractive although persecuted: because of their practical caring for each other, their care of the marginalised, disenfranchised, orphan, children and, women.
They held high standards of work ethics, positive attitudes, timeliness, honesty, and hard work.[5]
They experienced huge exponential growth, to the extent that in 150 years, most of Asia Minor, and North Africa was transformed by Christianity and their former persecutors became the protectors of the faith when the Roman State accepted Christianity as their formal religion by 337AD.
In the book of Acts, we read of Paul’s work in Ephesus, and him starting a Bible School where he reasoned daily from 9:00 – 15:00 in the School of Tyrannus: And this continued for two years, so that all who dwelt in Asia heard the word of the Lord Jesus, both Jews and Greeks.
() According to Dreyer the greatest motivators behind this growth were: First-hand authentic encounters; missional focus; willingness to suffer and a unified focus to model the life and teachings of Christ: His supernatural and moral life.[6]
CAN IT BE THAT BY LOWERING THE ENTRANCE STANDARD: WE HAVE LOWERED THE OVER-ALL STANDARD?
The ninetieth century can be labelled as the century of evangelism: Tent Meetings and large gatherings, television broadcasts, has seen millions accept Jesus as personal Saviour, by praying a sinners prayer.
Examples: D. L. Moody, George Whitefield, Jonathan Edwards, John Wesley, Charles Finney, Billy Sunday, and in more recent years, Billy Graham, Franklin Graham, Luis Palau, and Greg Laurie.
And yet, in a 1990 interview with PBS, Billy Graham himself stated he believe that only about 25% of those who come forward at one of his events actually became Christians.
In recent years, studies have shown that only 6% of people who “come forward” at an evangelistic crusade are any different in their beliefs or behaviour one year later.
Of course, it is estimated that Billy Graham preached to more than 200 million people, and 6% of 200 million is still 12 million.
That’s significant.
Emphasis is always placed on follow-up, and local churches requested to use the occasion to draw in the net.
Effective follow-up and assimilation in discipleship programs have always been a problematic concern.
My personal experience is: The bate that hooked the fish is what will keep the fish.
The food that attracted the fish is what the fish is expecting to continue to receive.
If we’re not all living and preaching one message, it makes assimilation to a local church, difficult.
Furthermore: the most sustainable growth, is growing local churches, that mobilise their own members to make disciples!
[7]
THE EARLY CHURCH MODELLED CHRIST, NOT THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES:
Being a follower of Christ entails, a journey, an adventure of discovery as you get to know Him better, and He teaches you how to live your life, of letting go.
Nowhere in the Bible are we instructed to worship Christ.
Surely, we love and adore Him, but worshipping Him can make of Him an idol.
We choose to worship the part of Christ we have fashioned according to our image, that we like most, and cost us the least.
Becoming a faithful follower is the exercise and process of daily choosing to die to self, and abandon all in surrender to Him, again and again.
The vision, objectives, focus, strategy and outcome of the early Church was Christ, and Christ alone!
(, ; ; ; ; )
The early followers of Christ were identified not by their buildings, and church names, but by their lifestyle.
They were called “those of the way” (; , )
The name Jesus adopted for His new movement of followers were: ekklesia: gathering, assembly, meeting, congregation.
() a non-spiritual term used by the Greeks for almost any gathering like the mob, instigated by the silversmiths for bad business in Ephesus.
() Paul on occasion used ekklēsia in its real sense of an actual assembly to refer to the meetings of Christians.
This usage is particularly clear in his references to the assemblies of Christians at Corinth —”when you come together as a church” (); “in church I would rather speak five words with my mind” (); “women should be silent in the churches” (; cf.
14:35).
At other times, he refers to those people who assemble, whether the whole Church, as at Corinth (), or a smaller group, as in a house church (; ).
The great majority of instances of the word are in reference to a local church, hence the use of the plural for churches in a given region (, ; , ; ; ).
Less frequently, ekklēsia is used in a universal sense for all believers (; ; ).[8]
It is clear that Church was seen not as various legal entities, but as assemblies, congregations, gatherings of people who met daily, small or great in number, in homes, beaches, synagogues, temples, homes, schools in the name of Jesus.
(; ) Will this emphasis and perspective not free us all, from our denominational affiliations and loyalties.
WE ARE ONLY ONE IN CHRIST.
We who are many are one body (); one body (; ; ; ; ); as the body is one yet has many limbs, so is Christ (); by one Spirit we were all baptised into one body, Jews or Greeks, slave or free (); Jew and Gentile made one (); all one in Christ Jesus (); Jesus died to gather into one the children of God (); that they may be one even as we are one (; ); that they may become perfectly one (); that they may all be one (); one flock, one shepherd ().
PRESERVE THE UNITY, AS IT IS THE PRIMARY WAY GOD EXPRESSES PROXIMITY!
HIS PRESENCE!
For the purpose of unity, there was no such thing as doing something to attain unity.
Unity was only attained through our unification with His death and resurrection.
(; ; ) Once we have received this glorious oneness in Christ and His Church, we ought to fight to preserve it.
() Unity is not an objective; it is a consequence of the manifested Glory of Christ in our midst.
THE EARLY CHURCH WAS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT MOST WILL EXPERIENCE AS CHURCH TODAY:
For example, we know that the early Church met in homes for their regular church meetings (; , ; ).
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9