Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.45UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.13UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.6LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.79LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.01UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.81LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.77LIKELY
Extraversion
0.13UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.57LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.66LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Welcome and announcements
Welcome no matter who you are
We are gathered together today to worship God
Through songs of worship
Through prayer
Through offering
Through scripture study
Through communion
A couple of announcements we want to make sure you all know about
Fall Bash
We still need people to help with games
Congregational Meeting NEXT SUNDAY
For members - VERY IMPORTANT
Anyone wanting to know a bit more about our church and whats going on
Life Group Meeting Sunday, September 22nd
Dave Bisenius coming on to elders
Ray’s passing left us a spot we need to fill
Dave has been walking alongside the elders for some time
We are wanting to put Dave into the eldership to finish out this years term
Introduction: Paul’s Anguish Over Israel’s Rejection of the Gospel
This is a bit of a different kind of sermon
It’s a lot of text to try to preach through, but we are doing this because Paul is making one unified point from the opening of chapter 9 to the close of chapter 11
So today, we are going to cover a lot, but in a more brief overview sort of way
We will take the next three weeks to cover Paul’s argument more in depth
For today, we will cruise at a higher altitude and make some observations and applications as we go
Paul is upset for two reasons
Paul is upset for two reasons
He is a Jew who has turned to Jesus in faith, and he cares deeply for his ethnic people
He is concerned about the theological implications of the Jews rejecting Jesus
Paul ends chapter 8 with a grand pronouncement of God’s love and the fact that nothing in all of creation can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord -
For the Jewish Christian reading Paul’s letter, he would not be able to help wondering, “but Paul, what about our people?”
The Jewish people have rejected Jesus and have seemingly failed to participate in salvation
Has God abandoned his people Israel in favor of a new plan; i.e. the church?
For the Gentile Christian reading Paul’s letter, this is still important
If God inexplicably abandoned his people from the OT, what’s to say he won’t abandon us?
If God’s plan the first time around failed, what’s to say that this plan will succeed?
This is why I love the OT - it is not a separate story that God had to change gears from, it is a unified story that leads straight to Jesus
Ultimately, can God be trusted to fulfill his promises or not?
Application: When life does not go as I think it should, do I then assume that God either a) doesn’t exist or b) has failed?
A lot of people reason this way.
EXAMPLE:
If God is all powerful and good, why does evil exist?
If Got is all powerful but doesn’t prevent evil, he is not good
If God is good but doesn’t prevent evil, he is weak
If God is all powerful and good, why does evil exist?
Paul is wrestling with this kind of question: Has God failed in his promises to his covenant people in the OT?
If he has failed, then we cannot trust him with anything.
To answer this, Paul has to establish the following:
God has not failed in his promises to Israel
God’s plan of salvation has always been to justify people by faith
There is actually still hope for God’s covenant people Israel
I. God’s Word has not failed
Romans 9:6-
God does not save people based on ethnicity
Not all of ethnic Israel is “true” Israel
God has never been about human pedigree - people are not righteous or saved because they were born into the right family or ethnic group
True children of God are children of promise, not children of ethnic purity
God does not save people based on human merit or works
God has always had a habit of choosing people who were not the ones that human wisdom would say should be chosen
Jacob and Esau
Ancient near eastern culture highly favored the firstborn male of a family
Therefore, of the two sons of Isaac, (Jacob and Esau) who should be chosen to carry God’s redemptive plan forward?
Esau!
But God didn’t choose Esau; he chose Jacob.
Therefore, God cannot be said to have failed Israel
Therefore, Paul says it is a faulty assumption that all of ethnic Israel should be automatically saved because they were born as physical descendents of Abraham
In other words, God has not failed his people because he has never been about simply creating an ethnic people group
God has always been about saving all people, and he has always done this not on human merit or work but by his own grace and love
Application: Just because you were born in a Christian family and have grown up all your life going to church doesn’t mean you are saved
And you should not have an arrogance and pride because of your family pedigree
And you should not have an arrogance and pride because of your family pedigree
You should have a humility because you know that it is only by your faith in Christ that you stand, and God has not treated you according to your merit, but according to his grace
Likewise, Just because you were not born in a Christian family and have spent your whole life far from God doesn’t mean you cannot be saved
And you should not think you are too far from God to come to him
God desires to treat you not according to your merit, but according to his grace
Transition: Potential Complaint: this is unjust on God’s part - he doesn’t operate on merit?
He doesn’t judge people by their works?
He doesn’t act with people according to what they have done?
That’s not fair!
II.
God is sovereign and has the right to do as he wills
God is the creator and has the right to do whatever he wills with what he has made
Image of the potter and the clay
So far, Paul is not arguing a specific action that God takes in his sovereignty - he is arguing that God has the right to operate his world however he wants, without any input from any creature and without being bound by anyone or anything other than himself
God does not answer to anyone or anything else
It is his universe and he can do with it as he pleases
If you have a universe, then you can give God advice on how to run his; otherwise, it’s best to keep quiet
Application:
He does not answer to me, and he does not answer to you
He does not run the universe according to your definition of justice, your ideas of right and wrong, your opinions about how things should go
He does not run his church according to your opinions of how things should go
Paul narrows down his point by saying that part of God’s right is respond to human beings as he sees fit, specifically in either making them his people or not making them his people
Since all people are sinners, it would not be unjust for God to simply let everyone die
Quoting from Hosea, Paul says God reserves the right to make those who were not his people his people -
Quoting from Hosea, Paul says God reserves the right to make those who were not his people his people -
In this case, Paul is pointing to the surprising turn of events by which God has made gentiles his people
Hosea
Quoting from Isaiah, Paul says God reserves to right to make those who were his people not his people -
In other words, Paul is pointing to the surprising turn of events by which God has judged ethnic Israel
Transition: This of course begs the question: What does God do with his sovereignty?
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9