Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.08UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.07UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.16UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.73LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.73LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.75LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.07UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.15UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.16UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.19UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
BEGIN [chiefly Heb.
ḥālal; Gk. árchomai].
Those who interpret it in many passages pleonastically mean that in such passages as “began to teach” or “began to speak,” nothing more is intended than to express vividly and graphically the thought of the dependent infinitive.
Mt. 4:17; Lk. 3:23; Acts 1:1 are so understood.
For contrary opinion see Thayer’s Lexicon and Winer’s Grammar of NT Greek.
BEGIN [chiefly Heb.
ḥālal; Gk. árchomai].
Those who interpret it in many passages pleonastically mean that in such passages as “began to teach” or “began to speak,” nothing more is intended than to express vividly and graphically the thought of the dependent infinitive.
; ; are so understood.
For contrary opinion see Thayer’s Lexicon and Winer’s Grammar of NT Greek.
title={Begin},
volume={1},
journal={The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Revised},
publisher={Wm.
B. Eerdmans},
author={Jacobs, H. E.},
editor={Bromiley, Geoffrey W.Editor},
year={1979–1988},
pages={451}}
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9