Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.13UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.61LIKELY
Sadness
0.53LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.73LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.18UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.88LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.75LIKELY
Extraversion
0.05UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.45UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.57LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Introduction
Core questions at play here
Did God fail his covenant people Israel?
Did got change plans in the New Testament because his Old Testament plans failed?
Honest heart question: Why did Isreal reject their messiah?
Does this mean they are rejected?
If God has rejected members of the chosen people, then what is the advantage of belonging to the chosen people?
This is raw for us too - how many of us have loved ones who don’t know Jesus, though we wish they did.
Why do they not?
In a broader sense, why do people do what they do?
Is God shown to be unfaithful bec
General answer
Our culture asks these questions and frames them around the idea of destiny or fate
When things happen, is it because humans are making decisions, or because of “fate”?
God is working out a plan that began in the OT and culminated in the person and work of Jesus
For Christians, is God just pulling strings and making things happen, or are we free to make decisions?
Or some mix of both?
God does this according to his sovereign will, not according to human wisdom
Several themes are intertwining through
God is sovereign and has the right to do what he wants
Humans bear real responsibility for free choices
There is danger in overemphasizing either one of these
On the one hand, it is possible to go to such an extreme with God’s control over the world that we make nothing of human responsibility and choice
There remains great hope for Israel even though they have rejected God
People have used this over the years to justify their sin - God has pre determined that I will commit this sin, and on that grounds I cannot resist it and should not be held accountable for it
On the other hand, it’s possible to go to such an extreme with human choice and responsibility that we end up with a small view of God, one that is maybe well-intentioned but ultimately bound by human will and unable to intervene in the world
Today, we are going to look at the idea that God is sovereign
Let it never be said of this church that we have a small view of God
God is the creator of all of the universe - he alone is worthy of our worship and praise
What is it?
Divine sovereignty refers to God’s all-encompassing rule over the entire universe.
On the end of the spectrum of big, God is the creator of we think so far about 10 billion galaxies
Each galaxy has on average we think about one hundred billion stars
The right of God to rule over all of creation as the one who made it
That means there are perhaps about one billion trillion stars in our universe
On the small end of the spectrum, God is the creator of protons and electrons, quarks, atoms, molecules
At any given time, God knows the exact location, trajectory, velocity of every particle in existence
Let it never be said of this church that we do not believe human beings are responsible for their choices
This would be patently unscriptural
It would render any kind accountability or justice impossible
When Paul is teaching about why it is that Israel rejected God, he is going to do so in a way that speaks of God being in ultimate control over his creation and over his plan of redemption, and at the same time Paul is going to emphasize human choice in a way that fits in with the reign of God
Which gets us into - Paul wants to answer the charge that Israel’s rejection of God somehow affects whether we can trust God
How is God’s sovereignty expressed?
Creation and providence - God made and sustains all of creation
Human history - all authority is actually delegated authority, and God is the one who establishes kings and kingdoms as well as brings them down
Redemption - God is the one who has enacted and worked out the plan to redeem lost and sinful human beings - salvation is ultimately God’s work, not ours
Election
There is a lot of debate surrounding this topic, but one unifying thought I found this week from one author is helpful, and sums up the core things we must hold to
God chooses
A people to belong to him
Individuals for certain tasks and roles
Big question: Is election about individual salvation or a corporate entity belonging to God?
We are not going
Historically, nearly all Christian interpreters have agreed that God’s electing choice flows entirely from His grace, that human beings are moral agents responsible for our actions, and that personal participation in the community of the elect is by faith.
I. Jacob and Esau
In his sovereignty, God creates a chosen covenant people
Romans 9:6-
God is moving covenant promises and redemptive plans forward
God called Abraham in and promised that through Abrahams family lineage would come blessing for the entire world
A chosen people group through whom blessing would be mediated to the entire world
So the question with each generation after Abraham is, “who is the one carrying that promise forward?”
Abraham -> Isaac rather than Ishmael
Isaac -> Jacob instead of Esau
God “loved” Jacob and “hated” Esau
This is a Hebrew idiom - a rhetorical device by which the author heightens the tension of a contrast by stating it in absolute terms
Malachi refers to this story from Genesis and makes it clear that it is referring to nations and people groups
God did not choose Esau
God chose the people of Israel in a way that he did not choose the people of Edom
This was done before they were born, and before they had done anything either good or bad
For the purpose of God’s election
Election can mean several things in the Bible
Historically, nearly all Christian interpreters have agreed that God’s electing choice flows entirely from His grace, that human beings are moral agents responsible for our actions, and that personal participation in the community of the elect is by faith.
God choosing a people to be his -
God appointing certain individuals to a task or role
Kings, priests, judges, prophets
God choosing a people to be his -
Malachi picks this theme up and applies the idea of God’s choice of Jacob to a people group rather than just a man
God makes it clear throughout the Old Testament () that he has not chosen these people because of any of their merit
Jacob I loved
Illustration: Kickball team
This language of God choosing a people to be his is mirrored in the New Testament, where even gentiles by faith are included in God’s people by faith in Jesus
In the OT, non-Israelites could become part of the covenant people of God, the elect, by faith in in the God of Israel
Expressed in his choosing of Israel
Ruth the Moabitess
Esau I hated
Expressed in his not choosing of Edom
Rahab in the book of Joshua
God does not “hate” Esau - the statement is a Hebrew idiom that expresses a contrast by stating it in extreme and absolute terms
So Paul is saying that 1) in his sovereignty God creates a chosen people, 2) belonging in that chosen people is not based on ethnic heritage, and 3) belonging in that group is not based upon human work or merit but on God and his grace.
Question: Does that not constitute injustice on God’s part?
If God doesn’t look at human merit, we think that’s unjust, because we are “earning” oriented people.
For example, we take offense at Jesus’ parable of the servants who all showed up to work at different times and got paid the same amount.
II.
Moses and Pharaoh
In his sovereignty, God has mercy on some and hardens others
Romans 9:14-
God speaks of mercy and compassion to Moses
Moses asks to see God
God speaks his “name” to Moses
God says that he will reveal himself to Moses as an act of compassion that God reserves the right to bestow on whom he will
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9