Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.12UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.12UNLIKELY
Fear
0.07UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.22UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.6LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.83LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.78LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.39UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.15UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.77LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.62LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Philip limited what Jesus could do.
This was a teaching moment for Philip
Difference between Philip and Andrew.
Philip is compleltly overwhelmed by the issue.
Andrew tries to do something about it.
God helps those who helps themsleves
Context of feeding the people in the wilderness.
Jesus is ultimaelty the provider
Accodring to Baruch the Messiah would bring Manna
Philip from the area
The food was more than enough to make them full
He compared to the “Prophet” because the Prophet was to be like Moses and Jesus fed them in the wilderness.
But unlike the wilderness they got to keep the leftovers.
John 6:25-
Some people come to Christ for only material advantage (abuse of church charity) those who only serve God until they don’t get what they want.
They were going after their most base desire like animals.
Food you conitnually need but it is temporal you need eternal life
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9