Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.14UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.51LIKELY
Sadness
0.18UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.58LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.59LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.89LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.86LIKELY
Extraversion
0.66LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.63LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.76LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The word ‘deacon’ might illicit a particular image in your mind.
I’ve heard more than one Christian comedian make joke after joke about church deacons.
Ask any Baptist pastor to describe their deacons, and you’re in for some fun conversations.
Ask certain deacons to describe the pastor, and you’ll get the same.
There are two biblical offices in the NT church: elder and deacon.
Last week we looked at what Paul writes to Timothy regarding the office of elder.
Now, in verse 8 of 1 Timothy 3, Paul turns his attention to the other office in the leadership of the church: the deacon.
We have a list of requirements for those who would be deacons.
The requirements are listed right here in our verses for today.
But the responsibilities might not be quite as clear; at least not as clear as those of the elder, so that’s what we’ll explore this morning.
Why deacons?
Why not have one blanket church leadership team?
Some churches function in this way.
They’ll have a combined board—elders, deacons, church members—all deciding everything together.
The problem is, the Lord organized His Church differently.
It’s not party rule.
God didn’t tell us to organize a church board.
In one place I served, the leadership was referred to as “the church cabinet”.
It all seemed way too political/presidential, reflective of the pastor’s ego or something; I don’t know.
It was weird, to say the least.
From time-to-time, the Senior Pastor would say, “I’ve assembled the cabinet” like he had the launch codes or something.
“There’s a situation in Scranton; call the cabinet.”
The Lord ordained that elders lead the church, to give oversight, to shepherd, to teach and preach and pray.
And He set forth deacons to serve and to help.
We see this come about in the early church, for a specific purpose; a group of seven men who would help the apostles (who were functionally church elders).
These men would help them by taking over a large portion of the service needs.
This is what we read, early on in the book of Acts:
The apostles/elders knew that it wouldn’t be right for all their time to be spent in distributing food and meeting only the physical needs of the church members.
They realized that they could not neglect the ministry of the word of God.
So they had the church choose deacons so that they, the elders, could give their attention to prayer and the ministry of the word.
This was pleasing to the group.
And they chose and presented men to the apostles/elders.
The result: the word of God spread.
Bottom line: when the church operates as it should, each doing their own part, more people are reached with the gospel and more ministry happens.
This is the goal.
This is why we seek to do things as the Lord would have us; to do Bible things in Bible ways is not just one of the ideals of the Restoration Movement.
Doing Bible things in Bible ways works.
We don’t trust our clever ways of operating.
We trust in the Lord and follow His lead and His direction.
If you have your Bible (and I hope you do) please turn with me to 1 Timothy 3. If you are able and willing, please stand with me for the reading of God’s Holy Word:
May the Lord add His blessing to the reading of His Holy Word!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let’s notice, first of all, a repeated phrase in these verses.
A good practice to adopt in your Bible reading is to read through the passage you’re studying a few times (some say 7-10 times) and pay attention to repeated words and phrases.
I didn’t learn this until college; it seems so simple and it is.
This practice alone will make a huge difference in your Bible reading and study.
There’s a phrase at the beginning of verse 8 and then again at the beginning of verse 11: in the same way...
In the same way...
Paul was just writing about overseers, that is elders.
Describing the qualities and characteristics of the spiritual leadership of the church.
And then, in verse 8, we have these words: in the same way.
And Paul discusses deacons.
Paul writes about deacons, describing the qualities and characteristics of those who would be deacons.
And then, in verse 11, we have these words: in the same way.
And Paul discusses women.
At verse 8 and then again in at verse 11, Paul seems to be introducing a new facet of leadership in the church.
Talk about elders (elders this, elders that), in the same way deacons (deacons this, deacons that), in the same way, the women…
What’s Paul doing here?
Some think he’s giving direction to or mentioning the qualifications of deacons’ wives.
Your bible might even read “in the same way, their wives” or “likewise, their wives...”
That Paul is talking about deacons’ wives is a possibility, but it’s awful strange that Paul would write about the wives of deacons and not anything about the wives of elders.
Also the word their (as in their wives) is not in the Greek text; the word for wives and women is the same.
What’s Paul doing here?
I believe he is, under the inspiration and power of the Holy Spirit, telling the church that both
Men and women can serve as deacons.
That phrase—In the same way—seems to introduce a new group; that is, women who are deacons.
You could call them “deaconesses”, but I see no point in that; nor do I see a Greek word for that.
My mom was a “deaconess” in our church while I was growing up.
There were a group of them, “the deaconesses”.
I didn’t think anything of it then (I was just a kid, and I was more interested in playing football on the front lawn of the church than I was in the happenings of the deaconess meeting).
I didn’t think much of it then, but now it seems like it was an arbitrary way to separate men and women who were doing the same job, occupying the same biblical position, fulfilling the same role in the church.
What seems clear from the text is that the women who would occupy this role are given some qualifications, some characteristics to exhibit.
Hot take?
I don’t believe this would even qualify as a warm take.
It’s a biblical take, and a pretty conservative one at that.
Here;s my take: my understanding from the Bible is, whereas only men are to be elders, both men and women can be deacons.
There’s even one women introduced to us as a deacon.
Some will say, “Yeah, but the word for deacon there can just mean servant.”
And that’s true.
The word for deacon is the word for servant; that’s what being a deacon means.
Various forms of the word for deacon appear in the NT about 100 times.
Deacon might mean servant there when Paul names Phoebe, but deacon might just mean deacon.
And from what we know about what the Bible says here in 1 Timothy 3 and of the other influential women in the early church (Paul specifically mentions 17 different women), the case for this—women as deacons—becomes even stronger.
This we know: elders and deacons are to work together to advance the Good News about Jesus Christ and lead the Church on mission.
The two offices go together—elder and deacon; the introduction to Philippians pairs them together.
There is ample evidence and reason to believe that both men and women can and should be deacons in the local church.
Again, we want to do Bible things in Bible ways.
We are to be people of the Book.
This is our only rule of faith and practice.
Tradition and preference have a place, but both are completely subservient to Scripture; in fact, we must be willing to abandon tradition and preference in favor of what the Bible says and the mission God has for us.
>So, as we discuss the role of deacon this morning, go ahead and picture in your head both men and women occupying this role.
I’m not sure if there has ever been women serving as deacons officially in Rich Hill Christian Church, but, Lord willing, there will be!
We are not so concerned about “what we’ve always done.” We’re very much concerned with what the Bible says.
Real quickly, let’s go through the list of qualifications for deacons:
Deacons must have control of themselves.
Four words in verse 8 form a natural grouping: respectful, sincere, not indulging in much wine, not pursuing dishonest gain.
These four areas: their behavior, their speech, their use of alcohol, their attitude toward money—these four express the idea that members of the diaconate are to have control of themselves.
In verse 11, Paul gives those women who would serve a few guidelines, all issues of personal control: worthy of respect, not malicious talkers, temperate (clear-headed), and trustworthy.
What’s more, deacons should have control of their households, an irreproachable home life.
As we choose deacons, the first question to ask is: “Are they in control of themselves?”
Deacons must have orthodox convictions.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9