Doctrine of Inspiration

Introduction

Define: doctrine of inspiration

Details of the common view of the doctrine of inspiration

Note the claim that the doctrine of inspiration includes the Lord using the characteristics of the human author

Point: note that “how” something is said provides relevant meaning, and not just “what” is said

Issue: all to often we seek to know the “facts” of Scripture

Just the facts, mam

However, God could have, but did not, provided a list of doctrines. Instead, he presented persuasive (inspired) writings that also included the requisite facts.

Goal: show the significance of “how” something is said

, argument inviting the listener to draw the conclusion him/herself.

Rebukes (direct, hard hitting)

Compassion

What we learn

That “how” something

That “how” something is said in Scripture is also part of the inspiration of the text (and not just “what” is said).

Vss 1-3: Peter tells the believers that there will be (assurance of a fact) false teachers among them.

The presence of false teachers is not new (false prophets of old)

The false teachers will introduce heresies

Many will follow the false teachers

The way of truth will be maligned

At this point, Peter addresses the likely concern that would arise for the believers: what will we do? How can we get away?

This is where Peter’s reply comes in

What Peter did not say

Peter did not simply state the “facts.”

Stating the facts would look something like this:

God is sovereign and will take care of you.

God has taken care of more people with bigger challenges so He is able to easily take care of your. Do not be concerned just do your part and stay away from the false teachers.

Peter certainly could have replied in a succinct fashion as this. In fact, this is the substance of what Peter states in verses 4-10a. However,