Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.09UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.08UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.59LIKELY
Sadness
0.45UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.49UNLIKELY
Confident
0.3UNLIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.74LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.71LIKELY
Extraversion
0.16UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.56LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.7LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
This has been a big week; I’m sure a lot of you are exhausted, and you still have a lot more to do.
My goal here is not to teach you anything new about evangelism methods or evangelism prep (Harry and Manu have already done that, and they’re far better equipped than I am to do that anyway).
But Lord willing, tomorrow you’ll be going back home.
And I hope you’ll continue to do what you’ve been doing very intensely this week in your respective neighborhoods and cities and towns.
And it’s that context—the context of your local community—that I want to talk about here.
When I was a kid I was in a church that had an evangelism training program.
I wasn’t a Christian, but I loved my dad and wanted to make him happy, so when he asked me if I’d be interested I signed up.
We learned a method of sharing the gospel, of sharing our testimonies; we practiced together over the course of a few weeks; and then for several weeks after that, we’d go out once a week to do some door-to-door evangelism.
When I was finished, I put that whole experience on the shelf, thought, Okay, I did that, and moved on.
And I didn’t think about it again until I was an adult, when actually was a Christian, and I was learning what the Bible said.
And when I thought about it for the first time, something struck me that I hadn’t thought of before, and I was just flabbergasted it happened this way.
And here’s the thing.
If we shared the gospel with someone, and they “made a decision for Christ,” we would pray with them, take their contact information so we could follow up in a few weeks to see how they were doing…and then leave.
In everything we would say to them, from the testimonies to the sharing of the gospel to the follow-up, we never mentioned the church.
Or if we did, it was almost always to those people who weren’t receiving the gospel—it was kind of, “If you want to know more, come to church” thing.
Church was just another tool in the evangelism bag.
At first I thought that maybe it was just something that happened in America in the late 80s/early 90s (yes, I’m that old), so I did some checking, and I asked around, and I realized that for a lot of people who did regular, intentional evangelism, it still happened this way.
They’d rack up so-called “conversions,” without ever thinking about the aftermath.
Or I’d see churches put on evangelism events—concerts or shows or testimonials.
They’d tout huge numbers of conversions after such events.
And then they’d never stop to wonder why, out of thirty new believers they had at that event, they’d see only one or two of them again.
We often see evangelism as a one-on-one endeavor.
It’s me, talking to an individual (or a couple of individuals) about Christ, in a neutral context.
And we like that, because we know that people are wary of church, whereas a conversation with one or two people who happen to be Christians is far less intimidating.
We can have our method down perfectly, have all the best means of convincing and explaining and sharing our testimonies, and even get “decisions for Christ” (Is it clear that I hate that phrase?) in record numbers… But if our ecclesiology is skewed, then everything we do is going to be off.
So rather than talking about evangelism directly, we’re going to spend a couple of minutes talking about ecclesiology—what the Bible says about the church.
Because I’ll maintain that the church—and not “decisions for Christ”—is the end goal of evangelism.
Our evan
We’ll take a broad view first, and then we’ll focus in on one text in particular.
Church membership: an implicit command
In our church, if you want to become a member, you have to take a membership class.
It’s a day-long event: 9:00 to 5:00 on a Saturday, with an hour break for lunch.
We go through our church’s confession of faith, our bylaws, the practical aspects of how things work in our church, etc. It’s long, and it’s intense, and it’s awesome.
We do it twice a year.
At the beginning of that class, we talk about why we even care about membership in the first place.
Because that idea—that you should belong to a local church—is not a given in our society.
But—surprise, surprise—the New Testament takes it as a given that those who believe in Christ will belong to a church—not go to a church: BELONG to a church.
And not the church, as in the universal church—a local church.
A church in your town, or even better, in your neighborhood.
Church membership is never explicitly commanded in the NT—but it is definitely implicit.
The New Testament takes it as a given that those who believe in Christ will belong to a church—not go to a church: BELONG to a church.
And not the church, as in the universal church—a local church.
Mark Dever gave this helpful visual (triangle).
If you took a weekend and read the New Testament, and you made a list of all the commandments in the New Testament, in 99.9% of the cases, you could draw a direct line between one of these corners and the other, or all three.
For example—:
14 Is anyone among you sick?
Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord.
If you’re sick, who should you call?
The elders of the church.
Any elders?
Of any church?
James never says it explicitly, but it’s clear that he’s saying, no, your elders—the elders of your church.
And by the same token, I (as an elder) am not responsible for praying for every sick person I see.
I can, of course, and that’d be a good thing for me to do; but it’s not among the responsibilities the Bible gives me.
I am called to pray for my people, to anoint my people.
(here’s a big one):
Let the one who is taught the word share all good things with the one who teaches.
He’s talking about paying your pastors.
Is Paul saying that you should pay anyone who teaches you?
I’m teaching you right now; should you pay me?
Of course not.
(You can, but you’re not commanded to.)
No—you’re called to pay your teachers, your pastors.
One more—:
Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account.
Whom should you obey?
All church leaders, everywhere?
No—some of those guys are nuts.
You are called to submit to your leaders: the leaders of your local church.
And I’m a pastor.
I care about all of you, and I’m praying for all of you.
But I’m not going to have to give an account before God for all of you.
And I’m not called to keep watch over your souls as an elder would.
Is anyone from Connexion here today?
I’m called to keep watch over them.
I’ll have to give an account for them.
But here’s the thing: I only know that because they belong to my church.
In nearly all of the commands in the NT, you will find an implicit context—and almost every time, that context will be the context of the local church.
Every Christian should belong to a local church, because if you don’t, you will be unable to obey the Word of God.
You don’t have to “bear with” people you don’t know; you don’t have to show patience toward people you don’t know.
You can just leave.
If you want to obey most of the New Testament commands, you need to know which church you belong to, and to whom you are accountable.
The Goal of Evangelism (Ephesians 4.1-16)
The NT’s implicit teaching on membership: membership stuff—cours de membres
Now let’s keep that idea in mind, and see how it works itself out in one text in particular: .
3.5: In evangelizing without church, we will (but for the grace of God) create the very kinds of people that Paul tells Timothy to avoid.
In chapter 3 Paul speaks of this amazing plan of God—to take the Jewish Messiah, Jesus Christ, and through him to open up the kingdom of God to all the nations of the world, so that (as he says in v. 10) through the church the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly places.
3.7: They will learn everywhere—and that’s good.
But learning outside the context of the body is an exercize in futility: it’s the perfect way to learn a ton of stuff and never come to a knowledge of the truth.
3.10-15: The example—Timothy followed not only Paul’s teaching, but his conduct, his love, his sufferings, his perseverance.
And as he starts chapter 4, he’s saying, “Because all that is true, here’s how I’m calling you to respond.”
Timothy did not learn his faith in a bubble.
Neither can we.
V. 1:
I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, urge you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called, 2 with all humility and gentleness, with patience, bearing with one another in love, 3 eager to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.
OK, that’s a perfect example of what I was saying before.
It is impossible to obey v. 1-3 of outside of the context of a community in which you know your brothers and sisters very well.
You don’t need to consistently show humility, patience, gentleness, forbearance, with strangers.
You just walk out the door.
Anon, 2016.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9