Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.17UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.16UNLIKELY
Fear
0.09UNLIKELY
Joy
0.48UNLIKELY
Sadness
0.54LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.03UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.76LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.84LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.16UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.17UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.26UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.45UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
The Guardian
“Put in charge” (NIV) is better translated “tutor” (NASB) or, better still, “guardian.”
The slave assigned to this role would watch out for the student on his way to school and help him with his manners and schoolwork, but he was not the teacher himself.
Children sometimes resented but often grew fond of their slave guardians and later freed them.
Such guardians were also normally better educated than the free masses; the image is not intrinsically demeaning.
But it was hardly the way most other Jewish teachers would have described the law.
(They occasionally describe Moses as Israel’s “guardian” till Israel grew up.
Philosophers spoke of philosophy as a “moral teacher,” and Judaism spoke of the law as a “teacher.”)
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9