Note Those
Go into false teachers, false doctrine, false apostles, false worship (Samaria), false prophets, etc. Explain what they look like and how they operate.
Note Those Who Cause Division and Offenses
Hippolytus
Irenaeus’ disciple Hippolytus also understood Simon Magus as an apostate. Similar to the church fathers before him, he recounts Simon’s confrontations with the apostles in Rome, where he met opposition from Peter in particular for his teachings (Adversus Haereses 6.15). Hippolytus goes beyond Irenaeus by providing further information about Simon’s background. For instance, Hippolytus notes that a sorcerer named Thrasymedes mentored Simon and taught him how to deify himself (Refutation 6.2). Hippolytus denounces such teaching by stressing that it was perpetrated by demons and fully repudiated by the apostles.
Hippolytus provides a lengthy discourse comparing Simon to another well-known sorcerer, Apsethus from Libya. He recounts how Apsethus, who also believed himself to be divine, trained a flock of parrots to repeat the phrase “Apsethus is a god” and then sent them out to spread that message. The parrots failed to convince the area’s residents, who in turn trained the parrots to repeat that Apsethus had tricked them and that he really was not a god. When the Libyans heard this, they came together and burned Apsethus (Refutation 6.3). In giving this extra background information, Hippolytus apparently sought to remind his readers that Simon was a worthless magician and a fraud (Refutation 2.3).
Later Works
Simon also appears in the writings of others from the early church period, such as Tertullian, Epiphanius, and even in the so-called pseudo-Clementine literature, which depicts Simon as a deceiver (Haar, Simon Magus, 118–131). Throughout the post-New Testament literature, Simon Magus is viewed as a counterfeit believer and antagonist of the Christian faith. These disparaging portrayals continued through the medieval era and into early modern traditions in both literary and artistic renditions. As a result, it is likely that Simon Magus will forever be identified as the quintessential heretic (for a detailed discussion of Simon throughout the centuries, see Ferreiro, Simon Magus).
Bibliography
Barrett, C.K. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary of the Acts of the Apostles. Vol. 1. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1994.
Bock, Darrell L. Acts. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.
Simon Magus
According to Irenaeus, Simon Magus was the one “from whom all the heresies take their origin” (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, 1.23.2 [Foerster]). Simon Magus, a sorcerer found in Samaria by Phillip, worked wonders among the people before Phillip converted him to Christianity (Acts 8:13). Following his conversion, Simon attempted to purchase the power of the Holy Spirit from Peter before being rebuked (Acts 8:9–24). Perhaps because the New Testament claims that Simon assumed the divine title of “the Great Power of God” (Acts 8:10, NAS), Irenaeus records that Simon actually believed himself to be God (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, 1.23.2 [Foerster]). In Irenaeus’ account, Simon preached himself as the god who first created “Thought, the mother of all”—his female companion (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, 1.23.2 [Foerster]). Irenaeus further records that Simon claimed that from thought, the angels and human beings were created, but because “the angels were governing the world badly,” Simon descended into human form “to bring things to order” (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, 1.23.3 [Foerster]). Irenaeus goes on: Simon promised that when “order” came, his followers would be saved, and “the world will be dissolved” (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, 1.23.3 [Foerster]). Although the account of Simon’s religious beliefs includes no reference to a saving gnosis, Irenaeus concludes that Simon gave the “falsely so-called gnosis” its beginnings (Irenaeus, Adversus Haereses, 1.23.4