Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.02UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.06UNLIKELY
Fear
0.04UNLIKELY
Joy
0.58LIKELY
Sadness
0.4UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.82LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.3UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.97LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.31UNLIKELY
Extraversion
0.72LIKELY
Agreeableness
0.39UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.45UNLIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
1. Redistribution of wealth is forced, and biblical quality is voluntary.
2. Redistribution of wealth considers need only, and biblical equality considers qualification.
3. Redistribution of wealth is the fruit of violence, and biblical equality is the fruit of love.
4. Redistribution of wealth denies personal property, and biblical equality protects private property.
5. Redistribution of wealth omits reciprocity, and biblical equality demands it.
6. Redistribution of wealth is the action of the masses (or government), and biblical equality flows from forethought and love of those who give (individuals).
7. Redistribution of wealth depletes and burdens, and biblical equality does not.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9