31 Sunday Year C
Call of Levi (5:27–32)
Parables of Lost and Found (15:1–32)
Call of Zacchaeus (19:1–10)
Jesus’ hospitality with tax collectors and sinners
5:29
15:1
19:5
Jewish leaders “mutter” ([dia]gongyzein) against Jesus
5:30
15:2
19:7
Jesus defends his table fellowship
5:31–32
15:3–32
19:9–10
Salvation of the lost
5:31–32
15:3–32
19:9–10
Rejoicing
5:32 (implied)
15:5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 32
19:6
Luke’s final description of Zacchaeus is “wealthy.” Wealth and wealthy persons receive greater attention in the Third Gospel than anywhere else in the NT.30 As noted earlier (see at 18:18), Luke does not earmark wealth as categorically evil, but it nevertheless poses a danger to discipleship that cannot be minimized. The introduction of Zacchaeus in vv. 1–2 is thus compromised, for although Luke depicts Jesus as a “friend of tax collectors and sinners” (7:34), he has not (yet) depicted him as a “friend of the rich.” Zacchaeus is described as both, a “rich sinner,” and we cannot predict how he will fare with Jesus.
Christ loves all people—even the crooked people who cheat. He does not love what they do—He loves their soul! Christians should hate sin—but love sinners!
How did a rabbi of the holiness attributed to Jesus know to call such an inveterate rascal as Zacchaeus by name? Luke does not know either; it seems that Jesus is here displaying his divine insight. It is certainly clear from Luke’s narrative that Jesus is in control of the hugely ironic reversal of expectations taking place among the residents of Jericho.
In Judaism, legal restitution for having been guilty of extortion was twenty percent (Lev. 5:16; Num. 5:7), but Zacchaeus assumes the harsher penalty imposed on people who stole livestock (Exod. 22:1; Bock 1994–96: 2.1520).
Later sources record that Peter appointed Zacchaeus bishop of Caesarea, though against his will (Pseudo-Clement, Homilies 3.63; Apostolic Constitutions 7.46). This is more than likely a pious fancy, but if actual, then it would be one more irony to crown the ironies already found in Luke’s dramatic account of the surprising conversion of Zacchaeus. Transformed by grace, in his new calling he can for the first time in his life live up to the meaning of the name his parents gave him.
Later sources record that Peter appointed Zacchaeus bishop of Caesarea, though against his will (Pseudo-Clement, Homilies 3.63; Apostolic Constitutions 7.46). This is more than likely a pious fancy, but if actual, then it would be one more irony to crown the ironies already found in Luke’s dramatic account of the surprising conversion of Zacchaeus. Transformed by grace, in his new calling he can for the first time in his life live up to the meaning of the name his parents gave him.