Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.56LIKELY
Disgust
0.17UNLIKELY
Fear
0.11UNLIKELY
Joy
0.54LIKELY
Sadness
0.57LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.49UNLIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.05UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.92LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.89LIKELY
Extraversion
0.2UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.56LIKELY
Emotional Range
0.82LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
ME:
Let’s start this morning by talking about government
Our government here in America was quite unique when established by our founding fathers
There was no queen, no prince, no lord, and no king
It made America distinct from our European ancestors
But we see in the Old Testament, we see the nation Israel
governed in an even more distinct way
Israel was governed by God Himself
It was a theocracy
Not only did God govern His people, He also defended them
But Israel was not satisfied being governed by God
So they repeatedly expressed a desire to be governed by a king
like all the other nations were
time and time again, they cried out for a human king
Eventually, God did give Israel their human king
First was Saul
After Saul was David, and David was a great king
After David, was an up and down cycle of some kings doing what was right in the eyes of the Lord
But most kings doing what was evil in the eyes of the Lord
This resulted in Israel being split into two nations
with both nations experiencing defeat and captivity
Their desire for a human king proved catastrophic
But that isn’t where the story ends
God had promised to send a King who would rule over Israel and all other nations as well
The OT foreshadows repeatedly this coming King who will reign over an eternal kingdom
We see it in Jacob’s blessing in
In Balaam’s final prophecy in
Moses and Joshua both served as human leaders, but neither were king
Gideon and Samson were judges that delivered Israel from foreign powers, but neither were kings
In fact Judges ends saying, “In those days there was no king in Israel.
Everyone did what was right in his own eyes.”
Israel gets David to serve as a king, but he is not the fulfillment of the earlier prophecies
but the prophesied King will come from the line of David
So who then is this king?
Back in , we see Jesus’s disciple, Nathanael, who is a Jew, state;
And last week, we were in the first 32 verses of
We observed Jesus was sovereign over all the events that had been taking place
as vs. 4 stated, Jesus knew everything that was happening
So Jesus orchestrated His arrest, predicted Peter’s denial, and guided His trial with the high priests to be brought before the Roman governor, Pilate
So that Jesus could control how He dies as well, by being lifted up
We ended with Jesus before Pilate
And now we pick up in vs. 33 with him asking the question that was proclaimed by Nathaneal back in chapter one
Is Jesus the King of the Jews?
This is the question before us this morning
So let’s pray this morning then we will open up John’s gospel together
So let’s pray this morning then we will open up John’s gospel together
WE:
Is Jesus the King of the Jews?
That is our question this morning
And I am going to go ahead and give the answer
And I am going to go ahead and give the answer
Yes, yes He is
Well ok, that settles it, we can all go home
Not really
Yes, Jesus is the King of the Jews who came down to earth for a specific task
and He won’t depart until it is finished
So yes, Jesus is the King of the Jews
But we are going to study God’s Word to explore this truth
We are going to start to see that The King is Down to Earth in ;
This passion narrative continues in John 18
If you recall back to last week, earlier in this chapter we saw Pilate didn’t want to deal with this
The Easton Bible Dictionary gives some background information on Pilate, describing him as a...
“Typical Roman, not of the antique, simple stamp, but of the imperial period, a man not without some remains of the ancient Roman justice in his soul, yet pleasure-loving, imperious, and corrupt.
He hated the Jews whom he ruled, and in times of irritation freely shed their blood.
They returned his hatred with cordiality, and accused him of every crime, maladministration, cruelty, and robbery.
He visited Jerusalem as seldom as possible; for, indeed, to one accustomed to the pleasures of Rome, with its theatres, baths, games, and gay society, Jerusalem, with its religiousness and ever-smouldering revolt, was a dreary residence.
When he did visit it he stayed in the palace of Herod the Great, it being common for the officers sent by Rome into conquered countries to occupy the palaces of the displaced sovereigns.”
“typical Roman, not of the antique, simple stamp, but of the imperial period, a man not without some remains of the ancient Roman justice in his soul, yet pleasure-loving, imperious, and corrupt.
He hated the Jews whom he ruled, and in times of irritation freely shed their blood.
They returned his hatred with cordiality, and accused him of every crime, maladministration, cruelty, and robbery.
He visited Jerusalem as seldom as possible; for, indeed, to one accustomed to the pleasures of Rome, with its theatres, baths, games, and gay society, Jerusalem, with its religiousness and ever-smouldering revolt, was a dreary residence.
When he did visit it he stayed in the palace of Herod the Great, it being common for the officers sent by Rome into conquered countries to occupy the palaces of the displaced sovereigns.”
It was believed to be custom for Pilate to go to Jerusalem to preserve order during the Passover
So after Pilate wasn’t able to just disregard this accusation, He brings Jesus in and cuts right to the chase, as we read this morning
Jesus, are you the King of the Jews?
And as was common for Jesus, He doesn’t answer Pilate directly, instead, He responds with a self-reflecting question for Pilate
And Pilate, still seeming to operate with a sense of callousness, asks if he is a Jew, implying, Jesus isn’t his king
Then takes it one step further, Your own nation handed you over to me
Your own people betrayed you
The Jews have handed their King over to the Romans to be crucified
So, King of the Jews, what did you do?
And Jesus tells him, I’m not just the King of the Jews
My Kingdom, is not of this world, it transcends this world
So I wasn’t betrayed by my subjects
If My Kingdom was of the world, my subjects would have seen to it that the Jews were not able to hand me over like this
Pilate’s tone seems to change slightly in vs. 37
So, you really are a king?
Jesus just said His Kingdom is not of this world
now He is saying that He is the King that has come down to earth
He came to bear witness to truth
A subject Pilate seems to not be a fan of
because He basically walks away from Jesus at this point rhetorically asking, what is truth?
But then, He goes out and announces that Jesus isn’t guilty and refers to Him as the King of the Jews publically
This is the first of four public proclamations by Pilate that Jesus is King
In 19:14, after Jesus is whipped, Pilate says “Here is your King!”
Then immediately after, in vs. 15, He asks “Should I crucify your king?”
And we will look in greater detail when we get there, but the sign he places atop the cross says “King of the Jews.”
Those four accounts, in addition to vs. 33 and 37, which we just read and three other times in chapter 19, Jesus is described as King
This is a key focus of His crucifixion in John’s gospel
It is made abundantly clear that Jesus is the King that has come down to earth
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9