Sermon Tone Analysis
Overall tone of the sermon
This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.11UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.04UNLIKELY
Fear
0.06UNLIKELY
Joy
0.55LIKELY
Sadness
0.1UNLIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.96LIKELY
Confident
0.73LIKELY
Tentative
0UNLIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.79LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.54LIKELY
Extraversion
0.08UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.08UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.65LIKELY
Tone of specific sentences
Tones
Emotion
Language
Social Tendencies
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Resolves about three themes
• The problem of mockery at the Lord’s Table—vv.
17-22: 1) In general; 2) Specifically
• A review of the significance of the Lord’s Table—vv.
23-26
• Warning about partaking of the Lord’s Table—vv.
27-34
The Corinthian practice included the agape feast
• View in light of the Matthew 26:20-29 account
• “While” (v.
26)—He institutes the Lord’s Table
• Paul is dealing with the love feast issue in vv.
17-22
• The purpose of the love feast was to be an equalizer
Mockery at the Lord’s Table—vv.
17-22
• Problem in general—vv.
17-19: 1) Its effect: a) Harmful; b) Degrading; 2) Its nature (justification for what he has said): a) When they assemble it is for worse; b) Divisions; 3) Its benefit (the factions: a) The factions are necessary; b) They show the approved by contrast
• Problem in particular—vv.
20-22: 1) Its negation—v.
20; 2) Its manifestation—21; 3) Its rebuke—v.
22
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9