Limitless Jesus
1. Limiting Jesus
a. to Experience v1-2
1. Limiting Jesus
b. to the Ordinary v3-9
c. to this Life v14-15
2. Limitless Jesus the King v10-13, 15
The connections become complex: the sacrifice of the lamb anticipates Jesus’ death, the Old Testament manna is superseded by the real bread of life, the exodus typologically sets forth the eternal life that delivers us from sin and destruction, the Passover feast is taken over by the eucharist (both of which point to Jesus and his redemptive cross-work). ‘The movement from the miracle to the discourse, from Moses to Jesus (vv. 32–5, cf. 1:17), and, above all, from bread to flesh, is almost unintelligible unless the reference in v. 4 to the Passover picks up 1:29, 36, anticipates 19:36 (Exod. 12:46; Num. 9:12), and governs the whole narrative’ (Hoskyns, p. 281). At the same time, the Passover Feast was to Palestinian Jews what the fourth of July is to Americans, or, better, what the anniversary of the Battle of the Boyne is to loyalist Protestants in Northern Ireland. It was a rallying point for intense, nationalistic zeal. This goes some way to explaining the fervour that tried to force Jesus to become king (cf. notes on v. 15).
If Jesus used the common form of Jewish thanksgiving, he said something like this: ‘Blessed art thou, O Lord our God, King of the universe, who bringest forth bread from the earth.’ Jesus ‘blesses’ God, i.e. he thanks God; he does not ‘bless’ the food.
Mark and John are mutually supportive: each makes clear certain features of the other’s account. Mark points out that just before the feeding of the five thousand, Jesus sent the Twelve on a trainee mission throughout Galilee. The results were so spectacular that Herod Antipas was terribly upset, and wondered if John the Baptist, whom he had beheaded, had come back to life (Mk. 6:7–30). In the light of his popularity with the crowds, Jesus had crossed over to the east bank of the lake, along with his disciples, in order to gain some respite from their pressing attentions, and perhaps also to escape Herod’s jurisdiction. But the surging crowd ran around the north end of the lake and met Jesus on the east bank: escaping from Herod was easier than escaping from the crowd. Jesus taught them and fed them, for ‘he had compassion on them, because they were like sheep without a shepherd’ (Mk. 6:34). This does not so much mean that Jesus viewed them as a congregation without a pastor, as that he saw them as an army without a general (1 Ki. 22:17). He well knew that the wrong sort of ‘king’ would not only divert them from the things that really mattered, but could lead them into a conflict with Rome from which they could not escape without a disastrous beating. All of this background, made clear in Mark, explains John 6:15. John does not bother to provide more details, most likely because they were largely irrelevant when he wrote: Jerusalem had already fallen, and the political setting was vastly different from when Jesus ministered and Mark wrote. Yet ironically, it is John, not Mark, that preserves the conclusion that Jesus knew the people were going to try to make him king by force—a fitting capstone for, and corroboration of, Mark’s account, and a compelling explanation of Mark 6:45.