Sermon Tone Analysis

Overall tone of the sermon

This automated analysis scores the text on the likely presence of emotional, language, and social tones. There are no right or wrong scores; this is just an indication of tones readers or listeners may pick up from the text.
A score of 0.5 or higher indicates the tone is likely present.
Emotion Tone
Anger
0.1UNLIKELY
Disgust
0.44UNLIKELY
Fear
0.08UNLIKELY
Joy
0.57LIKELY
Sadness
0.52LIKELY
Language Tone
Analytical
0.64LIKELY
Confident
0UNLIKELY
Tentative
0.6LIKELY
Social Tone
Openness
0.79LIKELY
Conscientiousness
0.55LIKELY
Extraversion
0.25UNLIKELY
Agreeableness
0.24UNLIKELY
Emotional Range
0.54LIKELY

Tone of specific sentences

Tones
Emotion
Anger
Disgust
Fear
Joy
Sadness
Language
Analytical
Confident
Tentative
Social Tendencies
Openness
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Emotional Range
Anger
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9
Some of you have seen the Back to the Future trilogy of movies.
In these fiction movies Marty McFly travels back or forward in time in an effort to change circumstances that lead to a different present.
5 years ago, Gospel recording artists Mercy Me recorded the song “Dear Younger Me.”
Are there things you would like to go back and tell your 20-year-old self?
I noticed a Facebook post that several of my friends shared.
It simple says “we are the same distance from 1990 and 2050.”
If there are things that you could have changed 30 years ago that would influence today.
What are the things we should do today to make 2050 better?
I’ve spent time this week thinking about change.
We all change physically.
Culture changes over time.
Values change as life events bring new experiences.
2019 has made some of us first-time parents or grandparents.
Last year or this will see some of us send our babies off to college or military service.
Already 2020 had made sister Joanne a widow for the 2nd time.
Some change is progress.
Some “progress” is decline.
Some values or practices from the past we wish to reinstitute.
Some challenges require us to acquire new skills in order to cope.
I had a brief conversation with a grandmother this last Wednesday who was exhausted from tending to her grandchildren.
My comment was “there is a reason that God gives us children in our youth, rather than middle or later life.”
Much ink has been spilled over America’s political leaders.
Social media and the 24-hour news cycle contribute to an unprecedented level of information about the personal lives and public policies of current and potential leaders.
Since Jesus Christ is not on the ballot for any office this year, then NO candidate is infallible.
If all candidates have faults, should we vote for any of them?
I don’t believe the end justifies the means.
Yet, I do believe that God uses sinful people to accomplish His perfect goals.
Today we begin a 10-week series in the Hebrew Scriptures book of Judges.
My goal is to learn from the mistakes of others and help us to see warning signs that we should avoid in our patriotism.
When: events happened between 1350-1050 BC. [based upon estimate death of last Elder who served with Joshua until time Saul was made King]
Who: Jewish Talmud indicates that Samuel (the last Judge) wrote Judges, although there is no internal evidence to this.
The tradition is that Joshua, Judges and Ruth were written to fill in the gap between Moses and David.
Other Scholars find that 18:30 speaks of the captivity of Dan which didn’t happen until 733 BC (300 years after Samuel died).
So we don’t really know who wrote it in the inspired form.
Transition: Now that we’ve done the 50,000 foot flyover, let’s look at the on-the-ground details of today’s text.
“Good” Start in the High Country (1:1-8)
Victory (v.1, 4)
1.
They inquire of the Lord
2. They are working together
a. Judah and Simeon were the 4th and 2nd sons of Leah to Jacob, so they are blood brothers
b.
Reuben was Leah’s firstborn and his land was on the East of the Dead Sea.
c. Levi was her 3rd son – the Levites were provided for by Temple taxes, they did not get their own land.
3.
They experience victory
Compromise (v.6-7)
1. Difference between “ethnic cleansing” and “religious purification”.
2. Instruction to Israelites was to “drive out” the idolaters (Ex 33, Dt 11, Josh 3)
“The Canaanites were not innocent.
[they] were so grossly wicked (Deut.
9:4–6).
If you want all the gory details, see Leviticus 18:6–30 and Deuteronomy 18:9–14.
These texts show that the conquest was an act of justice, Yahweh’s justice.
Israel was the instrument of his just judgment upon a corrupt and perverted people”[i] --Ralph Davis
3. By Josh 13 we find the compromise of “good enough” or “Okay”
4.
This same compromise continues after Joshua’s death.
Application
Amputating toes and thumbs was a humiliation because the soldier could no longer hold a sword or spear, nor could he maintain balance in battle.
· the newly arrived Israelites (including the tribe of Judah) have quickly adopted a Canaanite ethic.
Instead of looking to Yahweh for ethical guidance, the Israelites use the Canaanites as models when deciding how to treat captives.[ii]
· Instead of destroying the enemy, they would continue to taunt them.
This was an early example of cruel and unusual punishment and was a violation of the dignity of life that belongs to all image bearers.
Transition: The rest of the chapter mentions so many places that it may seem like a geography lesson.
And for many of us the only memory of geography is the name of the 50 capitals.
Let me remove some of the mystery by showing these on a map so that we can have reference points to make some sort of sense of this chapter.
It may be helpful to imagine a capital “G” hanging from a balloon.
1. Hebron (v.10)
2. Debir (vv.11-15)
3. Arad (v.16)
4. Hormah (v.17)
5. Gaza, Ashkelon, Ekron (v.18)
6. Jerusalem (v.21)
7. Bethel (vv.22-26)
8. Northern Tribes (vv.27-36)
Challenges in the Lowland (1:9-20)
Just as the Minutemen in our Revolutionary war did well in woodland skirmishes, but faced challenges to the superior numbers of the Redcoats in open battlefields, The army of Judah did well in the Hills, but struggled in the open plains of the low country.
Negev (vv.9-17)
1.
Big Picture (v.9)
2. Hebron (v.10)
· Sheshai, Ahiman & Talmai were tribal leaders in Hebron.
· They are the 3 Anakim referred to in v.20
3. Debir (vv.11-15)
a. Caleb had been given this area by Joshua in (Josh 14:6-15)
b.
Introduction of Othniel is foreshadowing to his role in ch.3.
4. Arad (v.16)
· Kenites (Medianites) moved from Jericho (city of Palms) and settled among the people of Judah
· “These alien allies compromise Israel’s mandate to eliminate the Canaanites.
Instead of destroying the city and its population they settle down among them, thereby sowing the seeds of Canaanization that sprout and flourish in the following chapters.”[iii]
5. Hormah (v.17)
a. Simeon actually does what they were instructed – destroy the idolatrous city, then re-establish it under Jewish ownership.
b.
The new name, which means “destruction,” plays on the term ḥerem, “devoted for destruction,”[iv]
Coastal Region (v.18)
1.
These 3 cities are on the Mediterranean coast and would mark the Western border of Judah’s land.
2. While Gaza and south is the strip currently occupied by Palestinians, Askelon and Ekron are in current Israeli territory between Gaza and Tel Aviv.
An Importance Contrast (vv.19-20)
1. Joshua 6 (Jericho) should have left Judah afraid of no one.
2. Joshua 17:16-18 specifically mentions that Ephraim and Manasseh would have power to overtake chariots.
3. “Presumably the Judahites experienced a failure of nerve at this point, or they were satisfied with their past achievements.”[v]
4. Caleb (v.20) seems to be the only one taking God at His word that they would not be overcome.
He’s driving out “giants” while the rest are intimidated by technology.
< .5
.5 - .6
.6 - .7
.7 - .8
.8 - .9
> .9