Exodus Notes wk 11 - The Exodus
Outlines
Thoughts
Notes
Time Time has come:
JUDGMENT & SALVATION
The Exodus
Self-Preservation - The Default Mode
The Israelites
God’s Promise Fulfilled
Parallel to Abraham in
Words
“urgent”
A somewhat more literal translation of v. 33 would read: “The Egyptians pressured the people in order to get them to leave the land quickly because they said, ‘We are all dead!’ ”
Mixed Multitude
The verse would best be translated as follows: “A huge ethnically diverse group also went up with them, and very many cattle, both flocks and herds.”
. In Num 11:4 Moses also referred to the significant numbers of non-Israelites among the Israelites, after leaving Sinai and in the wilderness travels, by a term most modern English translators render as “the rabble” or the like.
A mixed multitude is literally “a large mixture,” but the exact meaning of “mixture” is uncertain. The word is used in Neh 13:3 (12:38 RSV “those of foreign descent”), and in Jer 25:20 (“foreign folk”) and 25:24 (“mixed tribes”). NAB has “a crowd of mixed ancestry,” and Durham “a large and motley group.” At least the word also indicates that the “other people” (12:38 TEV) were not considered Israelites. This first sentence may then be expressed as “A large number of people who were not Israelites also went with them.”
The Number
We have no evidence from ancient times that allows us to calculate precisely the number of nonfighting Israelites, so the exact number of the whole nation will presumably never be known. It was a few tens of thousands but almost surely not several million.
3. The numbers were changed due to scribal misunderstanding. This view suggests that the numbers were originally much smaller, but that larger numbers were substituted later due to scribal misunderstanding of the Hebrew word ’elep, which can be translated either as “thousand” or “group” or “clan.” Thus it has been proposed that a number that now appears in Hebrew as 46,500 (1:21) originally meant 46 groups totaling 500 persons. Following this hypothesis, there would have been a total of 598 families, with a total of 5,550 male warriors, yielding a total population of about 20,000. This hypothesis, however, presents other difficulties, as do other similar proposals based on the meaning of the Hebrew word ’elep, one of which yields an estimated population of 140,000 and another that proposes a total population of 72,000. Those who support this general line of argument agree that it still needs refinement. They also agree that there is no one-size-fits-all solution for every OT case of what may seem to be very large numbers.