Messiah Died For Sins Once For All
The Priority of the Cross
If then Peter and Paul in their letters plainly saw the cross of Jesus in sin-bearing or curse-bearing terms, and both linked this fact with the verses in Deuteronomy about being hanged on a tree, is it not reasonable to suppose that already in their Acts speeches, in which they called the cross a tree, they had glimpsed the same truth? In this case there is more doctrinal teaching about the cross in the early sermons of the apostles than they are often credited with.
On several “ossuaries” (some found in the grounds of Dominus Flevit on the Mount of Olives, others in Talpiot and other locations) one discerns crosses. (An ossuary is a small stone coffin or box for reburial of bones. They were used by Jews in the period ca. 400 B.C.–A.D. 135.) Are these crosses Christian symbols? The Franciscan fathers think yes. The well-known archaeologist Jack Finegan supports this position with the following argument: the early Christian cross symbol is rooted in the Hebrew tav (+) symbolism. He demonstrates that the + (cross) mark is used in the margin of some Qumran scrolls to indicate passages about the Messiah or the messianic age. He points to the fact that although the + was a Jewish symbol, it was never previously used as a burial symbol in the Jewish tradition. Thus he supports the Franciscan view that the ossuary crosses are messianic symbols of Jewish Christian origin.