What's Right and What's Wrong with: Tradition
Intro
Background
Definition
Beliefs or customs handed down from previous generations.
The handing on of beliefs and practices from one generation to the next or from one group to a related group primarily by oral rather than written means.
The Gr word is παράδοσις, parádosis, “a giving over,” either by word of mouth or in writing; then that which is given over, i.e. tradition, the teaching that is handed down from one to another.
That which is handed down, particularly teaching handed down from a teacher to his disciples.
Sermon Points
When is “tradition” wrong?
The Gospels frequently refer to the tradition of the scribes and Pharisees (e.g., Matt. 15:3). While the Sadducees viewed the written text of the Torah as alone authoritative, the Pharisees cultivated an elaborate interpretive tradition as a way of dealing with the ambiguities and inexactness of God’s commandments. The resultant “tradition of the elders” (or “oral Torah”) was considered equal in authority to the written text elaborated by it. It represented simply the unfolding of what was implied in the written commandments, and was said to have been received by Moses from God on Mt. Sinai along with the written commandments and passed down orally from that time.
In 1st century Judaism, especially in Pharisaism, OT laws were adapted to new circumstances. The resulting case law was handed down, mainly in oral form. After some time the theory was formulated that Moses had received on Sinai the law in written form (the Pentateuch), but that oral commandments were passed on through the centuries by prophets, sages and rabbis. This oral law (Heb. halakhah, i.e. ‘how one should walk’) included all the case law developed from the written laws. Today in orthodox Judaism this traditional interpretation of the OT law, enshrined in the Talmudic literature, has almost the same authority as the OT itself.